IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.13702.html

Two-Sided Plausibility Constraints in Persuasion

Author

Listed:
  • Constantine Sorokin

Abstract

A sender with commitment provides additional information to an already informed receiver. Final posterior means must be more dispersed than initial means and less dispersed than the state, in convex order. We characterize when these two plausibility constraints are also sufficient, so that every distribution satisfying them can be induced. If the state has a positive density, they are sufficient exactly under interval-partition information: the receiver learns which interval of a partition contains the state and nothing more, where an interval may be a single point. Otherwise, a nonempty open set of distributions satisfying both constraints cannot be induced, even when the sender observes the receiver's information. We use the sufficient case to derive an optimal symmetric disclosure rule in a second-price auction where bidders initially know valuation intervals.

Suggested Citation

  • Constantine Sorokin, 2026. "Two-Sided Plausibility Constraints in Persuasion," Papers 2610.13702, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.13702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.13702
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anton Kolotilin & Tymofiy Mylovanov & Andriy Zapechelnyuk & Ming Li, 2017. "Persuasion of a Privately Informed Receiver," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85(6), pages 1949-1964, November.
    2. Julian Sester, 2023. "On intermediate Marginals in Martingale Optimal Transportation," Papers 2307.09710, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    3. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Extreme Points and Majorization: Economic Applications," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1557-1593, July.
    4. Kolotilin, Anton & Mylovanov, Timofiy & Zapechelnyuk, Andriy, 2022. "Censorship as optimal persuasion," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
    5. Kolotilin, Anton, 2018. "Optimal information disclosure: a linear programming approach," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 13(2), May.
    6. Piotr Dworczak & Giorgio Martini, 2019. "The Simple Economics of Optimal Persuasion," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 1993-2048.
    7. Dirk Bergemann & Tibor Heumann & Stephen Morris & Constantine Sorokin & Eyal Winter, 2022. "Optimal Information Disclosure in Classic Auctions," American Economic Review: Insights, American Economic Association, vol. 4(3), pages 371-388, September.
    8. Li, Fei & Norman, Peter, 2021. "Sequential persuasion," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(2), May.
    9. Julian Sester, 2023. "On intermediate marginals in martingale optimal transportation," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 2, June.
    10. Yingni Guo & Eran Shmaya, 2019. "The Interval Structure of Optimal Disclosure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 87(2), pages 653-675, March.
    11. Matthew Gentzkow & Emir Kamenica, 2016. "A Rothschild-Stiglitz Approach to Bayesian Persuasion," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 597-601, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ozan Candogan & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Optimal Disclosure of Information to a Privately Informed Receiver," Papers 2101.10431, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    2. Lily Ling Yang, 2024. "Information Design with Costly State Verifi cation," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_502, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    3. Yang, Lily Ling, 2026. "Information design with endogenous state verification," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    4. Zeng, Yishu, 2023. "Derandomization of persuasion mechanisms," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    5. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack, 2026. "Extreme Points and Majorization," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2025_749, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
    6. Ozan Candogan, 2022. "Persuasion in Networks: Public Signals and Cores," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2264-2298, July.
    7. Anton Kolotilin & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2025. "Persuasion Meets Delegation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(1), pages 195-228, January.
    8. Shishkin, Denis, 2026. "Evidence design and voluntary disclosure," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Maryam Saeedi & Ali Shourideh, 2020. "Optimal Rating Design under Moral Hazard," Papers 2008.09529, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    10. Azarmsa, Ehsan & Cong, Lin William, 2020. "Persuasion in relationship finance," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(3), pages 818-837.
    11. Kreutzkamp, Sophie & Lou, Yichuan, 2025. "Persuasion without ex-post commitment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Lyu, Chen, 2023. "Information design for selling search goods and the effect of competition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    13. Maxim Ivanov, 2021. "Optimal monotone signals in Bayesian persuasion mechanisms," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 955-1000, October.
    14. Anton Kolotilin & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2018. "Persuasion Meets Delegation," Discussion Papers 2018-06, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    15. Anton Kolotilin & Alexander Wolitzky, 2020. "Assortative Information Disclosure," Discussion Papers 2020-08, School of Economics, The University of New South Wales.
    16. Whitmeyer, Joseph & Whitmeyer, Mark, 2021. "Mixtures of mean-preserving contractions," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Kolotilin, Anton & Li, Hongyi, 2021. "Relational communication," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 16(4), November.
    18. Ichihashi, Shota, 2025. "Information and policing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    19. Qianjun Lyu & Wing Suen & Yimeng Zhang, 2023. "Coarse Information Design," Papers 2305.18020, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    20. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack, 2026. "Extreme Points and Majorization," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2492, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.13702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.