IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jetheo/v235y2026ics0022053126000463.html

Information design with endogenous state verification

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Lily Ling

Abstract

We study a persuasion problem in which the receiver has the ability to probabilistically verify the state at a cost. The sender wants to convince the receiver to accept a project, but the receiver is only willing to accept the project when its quality is above a threshold. The optimal disclosure policy strikes a balance between influencing the receiver’s decisions to accept and to verify the quality. It is deterministic and involves at most three messages, each consisting of an acceptance recommendation and a verification recommendation. Under the optimal disclosure policy, the acceptance recommendation exhibits a cutoff structure, while the verification recommendation exhibits a negative assortative structure. Specifically, the optimal disclosure policy recommends acceptance when the quality exceeds a certain threshold. When the quality falls below this threshold, rejection without verification is recommended. For qualities above the threshold, verification is not recommended if the quality lies within the middle range of the interval. Using the characterization of the optimal disclosure policy, we conduct comparative statics and show that verification is recommended when the probability of successful verification is moderate.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Lily Ling, 2026. "Information design with endogenous state verification," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:235:y:2026:i:c:s0022053126000463
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2026.106182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022053126000463
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jet.2026.106182?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:235:y:2026:i:c:s0022053126000463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/622869 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.