IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2610.08799.html

Explicit Finite-Sum Tail Risk Measures for Hierarchical Market--Credit Copula Aggregation

Author

Listed:
  • Luisa Tibiletti
  • Simone Farinelli
  • Eric Dal Moro

Abstract

Hierarchical copula models are widely used for aggregating market and credit risks across multi-level portfolio structures. Existing approaches often rely on Monte Carlo simulation, recursive sample reordering, or high-dimensional numerical procedures. This paper develops an analytical framework for hierarchical copula aggregation based on explicit finite-sum representations of aggregate loss distributions and tail-risk measures for two-level market-credit aggregation with Gaussian and mirrored Clayton copulas under empirical leaf-level marginals. We derive deterministic formulas for aggregate distribution functions, quantiles, expected tail losses, and market-credit tail contributions, together with a compatibility condition linking local hierarchical copulas and global leaf-level dependence structures. Estimation-error expressions for quantiles and expected tail losses are also obtained in finite-sum form. The paper further analyzes the qualitative asymptotic behavior of hierarchical aggregation under increasing tree depth. Gaussian hierarchies are argued to remain diversification-dominated, whereas mirrored Clayton hierarchies propagate upper-tail dependence recursively and may amplify extreme losses across aggregation levels. The resulting formulas provide a deterministic alternative to simulation-based aggregation methods and clarify how tail dependence propagates through hierarchical market-credit portfolios, with direct relevance for portfolio risk measurement and capital assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Luisa Tibiletti & Simone Farinelli & Eric Dal Moro, 2026. "Explicit Finite-Sum Tail Risk Measures for Hierarchical Market--Credit Copula Aggregation," Papers 2610.08799, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.08799
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2610.08799
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aas, Kjersti & Czado, Claudia & Frigessi, Arnoldo & Bakken, Henrik, 2009. "Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 182-198, April.
    2. Chaoubi, Ihsan & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Hierarchical copulas with Archimedean blocks and asymmetric between-block pairs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    3. Cossette, Hélène & Gadoury, Simon-Pierre & Marceau, Étienne & Mtalai, Itre, 2017. "Hierarchical Archimedean copulas through multivariate compound distributions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-13.
    4. Acerbi, Carlo & Tasche, Dirk, 2002. "On the coherence of expected shortfall," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 26(7), pages 1487-1503, July.
    5. Fang, Hong-Bin & Fang, Kai-Tai & Kotz, Samuel, 2002. "The Meta-elliptical Distributions with Given Marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496, December.
    7. Gordy, Michael B., 2003. "A risk-factor model foundation for ratings-based bank capital rules," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 199-232, July.
    8. Embrechts, Paul & Puccetti, Giovanni, 2006. "Bounds for functions of multivariate risks," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 526-547, February.
    9. Arbenz, Philipp & Canestraro, Davide, 2012. "Estimating Copulas for Insurance from Scarce Observations, Expert Opinion and Prior Information: A Bayesian Approach," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(1), pages 271-290, May.
    10. Arbenz, Philipp & Hummel, Christoph & Mainik, Georg, 2012. "Copula based hierarchical risk aggregation through sample reordering," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 122-133.
    11. Alexandra Dias & Isaudin Ismail & Aihua Zhang, 2025. "Copula-Based Risk Aggregation and the Significance of Reinsurance," Risks, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Giammusso, Davide & Puccetti, Giovanni, 2018. "A clustering approach and a rule of thumb for risk aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-248.
    2. Guillén, Montserrat & Sarabia, José María & Prieto, Faustino, 2013. "Simple risk measure calculations for sums of positive random variables," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 273-280.
    3. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    4. Hengxin Cui & Ken Seng Tan & Fan Yang, 2024. "Portfolio credit risk with Archimedean copulas: asymptotic analysis and efficient simulation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 332(1), pages 55-84, January.
    5. Maziar Sahamkhadam, 2021. "Dynamic copula-based expectile portfolios," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 209-223, May.
    6. Fangda Liu & Tiantian Mao & Ruodu Wang & Linxiao Wei, 2022. "Inf-Convolution, Optimal Allocations, and Model Uncertainty for Tail Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 2494-2519, August.
    7. Battulga Gankhuu, 2024. "Derivatives of Risk Measures," Papers 2404.09646, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    8. Guillaume Flament & Christophe Hurlin & Quentin Lajaunie & Yoann Pull, 2026. "Generalized Impulse Responses of Portfolio Default Probabilities: A Modular Framework with an Application to Geopolitical Risk," Papers 2608.04469, arXiv.org.
    9. Fabio Bellini & Muqiao Huang & Qiuqi Wang & Ruodu Wang, 2025. "Lambda Expected Shortfall," Papers 2512.23139, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    10. Osmundsen, Kjartan Kloster, 2018. "Using expected shortfall for credit risk regulation," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 80-93.
    11. Matteo Accornero & Giuseppe Cascarino & Roberto Felici & Fabio Parlapiano & Alberto Maria Sorrentino, 2018. "Credit risk in banks’ exposures to non‐financial firms," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 24(5), pages 775-791, November.
    12. N. Karimi & E. Salavati & F. Shokrollahi, 2026. "Climate-Conditioned Cascade Modeling for Multi-Peril Reinsurance: Analysis and Controlled Numerical Applications," Papers 2608.09456, arXiv.org.
    13. Maria Stefanova, 2012. "Recovery Risiko in der Kreditportfoliomodellierung," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-8349-4226-5, December.
    14. Michele Bonollo & Irene Crimaldi & Andrea Flori & Fabio Pammolli & Massimo Riccaboni, 2014. "Systemic importance of financial institutions: regulations, research, open issues, proposals," Working Papers 2/2014, IMT School for Advanced Studies Lucca, revised Mar 2014.
    15. Nuerxiati Abudurexiti & Kai He & Dongdong Hu & Svetlozar T. Rachev & Hasanjan Sayit & Ruoyu Sun, 2024. "Portfolio analysis with mean-CVaR and mean-CVaR-skewness criteria based on mean–variance mixture models," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 945-966, May.
    16. Daniel Velásquez-Gaviria & Andrés Mora-Valencia & Javier Perote, 2020. "A Comparison of the Risk Quantification in Traditional and Renewable Energy Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-42, June.
    17. Dorinel Bastide & Stéphane Crépey & Samuel Drapeau & Mekonnen Tadese, 2023. "Derivatives Risks as Costs in a One-Period Network Model," Post-Print hal-03910144, HAL.
    18. Chaoubi, Ihsan & Cossette, Hélène & Marceau, Etienne & Robert, Christian Y., 2021. "Hierarchical copulas with Archimedean blocks and asymmetric between-block pairs," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Annika Homburg & Christian H. Weiß & Gabriel Frahm & Layth C. Alwan & Rainer Göb, 2021. "Analysis and Forecasting of Risk in Count Processes," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Dong Hwan Oh & Andrew J. Patton, 2017. "Modeling Dependence in High Dimensions With Factor Copulas," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 139-154, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2610.08799. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.