IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.09456.html

Climate-Conditioned Cascade Modeling for Multi-Peril Reinsurance: Analysis and Controlled Numerical Applications

Author

Listed:
  • N. Karimi
  • E. Salavati
  • F. Shokrollahi

Abstract

Climate perils are linked through event ordering and state-dependent propagation, features not fully captured by joint loss distributions alone. This paper develops a Cascading Climate Risk Network (CCRN) for multi-peril reinsurance that separates calendar-scale climate conditioning from within-event propagation on a directed acyclic graph (DAG). The model combines complementary-log-log triggering hazards with bounded severity activation, mapping physical states to insured losses via a capacity-bounded demand-surge transformation. For fixed shocks, the event-scale cascade reaches a unique finite-step closure. Monotone comparative statics provide a pathwise upper-corner loss bound over rectangular stress sets, yielding a transparent contract-level stress-testing guarantee under common aleatory inputs. Comprehensive numerical experiments, including copula and Bayesian-network benchmarks, sensitivity analyses, and uncertainty propagation, demonstrate that while central layer prices remain robust across matched-marginal dependence structures, far-tail and high-layer behaviors differ materially. Directional propagation, annual event frequency, and dependence strength emerge as the principal risk drivers. The study provides a controlled synthetic verification of the proposed architecture.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Karimi & E. Salavati & F. Shokrollahi, 2026. "Climate-Conditioned Cascade Modeling for Multi-Peril Reinsurance: Analysis and Controlled Numerical Applications," Papers 2608.09456, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.09456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.09456
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aas, Kjersti & Czado, Claudia & Frigessi, Arnoldo & Bakken, Henrik, 2009. "Pair-copula constructions of multiple dependence," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 182-198, April.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Asuman Ozdaglar & Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi, 2015. "Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(2), pages 564-608, February.
    3. Nader Karimi & Foad Shokrollahi, 2026. "Pricing Excess-of-Loss Reinsurance and CAT Bonds under Climate Uncertainty: A Cox Process Framework with Temperature-Dependent Stochastic Intensity," Papers 2606.14830, arXiv.org.
    4. Alexander J. McNeil & Rüdiger Frey & Paul Embrechts, 2015. "Quantitative Risk Management: Concepts, Techniques and Tools Revised edition," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 2, number 10496, December.
    5. Drew Creal & Siem Jan Koopman & André Lucas, 2013. "Generalized Autoregressive Score Models With Applications," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 777-795, August.
    6. Timothy M. Lenton & Johan Rockström & Owen Gaffney & Stefan Rahmstorf & Katherine Richardson & Will Steffen & Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, 2019. "Climate tipping points — too risky to bet against," Nature, Nature, vol. 575(7784), pages 592-595, November.
    7. Edward Frees & Emiliano Valdez, 1998. "Understanding Relationships Using Copulas," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(1), pages 1-25.
    8. Christian M. Hafner & Hans Manner, 2012. "Dynamic stochastic copula models: estimation, inference and applications," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 269-295, March.
    9. Andrew G. Haldane & Robert M. May, 2011. "Systemic risk in banking ecosystems," Nature, Nature, vol. 469(7330), pages 351-355, January.
    10. Colin Raymond & Radley M. Horton & Jakob Zscheischler & Olivia Martius & Amir AghaKouchak & Jennifer Balch & Steven G. Bowen & Suzana J. Camargo & Jeremy Hess & Kai Kornhuber & Michael Oppenheimer & A, 2020. "Understanding and managing connected extreme events," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(7), pages 611-621, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nader Karimi & Foad Shokrollahi, 2026. "Pricing Temperature-Index Insurance under Long Memory and Stochastic Time Change," Papers 2608.15097, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Javier Ojea Ferreiro, 2025. "A Market-Based Approach to Reverse Stress Testing the Financial System," Staff Working Papers 25-32, Bank of Canada.
    2. Manner, Hans & Stark, Florian & Wied, Dominik, 2019. "Testing for structural breaks in factor copula models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 208(2), pages 324-345.
    3. Nguyen, Hoang & Virbickaitė, Audronė, 2023. "Modeling stock-oil co-dependence with Dynamic Stochastic MIDAS Copula models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    4. Tobias Eckernkemper & Bastian Gribisch, 2021. "Intraday conditional value at risk: A periodic mixed‐frequency generalized autoregressive score approach," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(5), pages 883-910, August.
    5. Kreuzer, Alexander & Czado, Claudia, 2021. "Bayesian inference for a single factor copula stochastic volatility model using Hamiltonian Monte Carlo," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 130-150.
    6. Patton, Andrew, 2013. "Copula Methods for Forecasting Multivariate Time Series," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, in: G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), Handbook of Economic Forecasting, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 899-960, Elsevier.
    7. repec:hum:wpaper:sfb649dp2013-041 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Anand Deo, 2025. "EVT-Based Rate-Preserving Distributional Robustness for Tail Risk Functionals," Papers 2506.16230, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    9. Smith, Michael Stanley, 2023. "Implicit Copulas: An Overview," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 81-104.
    10. Tobias Eckernkemper, 2018. "Modeling Systemic Risk: Time-Varying Tail Dependence When Forecasting Marginal Expected Shortfall," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 63-117.
    11. Manner, Hans & Alavi Fard, Farzad & Pourkhanali, Armin & Tafakori, Laleh, 2019. "Forecasting the joint distribution of Australian electricity prices using dynamic vine copulae," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 143-164.
    12. Zhang, Shulin & Okhrin, Ostap & Zhou, Qian M. & Song, Peter X.-K., 2016. "Goodness-of-fit test for specification of semiparametric copula dependence models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 193(1), pages 215-233.
    13. Roman Matkovskyy, 2019. "Extremal Economic (Inter)Dependence Studies: A Case of the Eastern European Countries," Journal of Quantitative Economics, Springer;The Indian Econometric Society (TIES), vol. 17(3), pages 667-698, September.
    14. Han, Yingwei & Li, Jie, 2022. "Should investors include green bonds in their portfolios? Evidence for the USA and Europe," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Michael Stanley Smith, 2021. "Implicit Copulas: An Overview," Papers 2109.04718, arXiv.org.
    16. Anne Opschoor & André Lucas & István Barra & Dick van Dijk, 2021. "Closed-Form Multi-Factor Copula Models With Observation-Driven Dynamic Factor Loadings," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 1066-1079, October.
    17. D. Sujatha & A. Krishna Sudheer & Elamurugan Balasundaram, 2025. "Black swan dynamics: a network-based framework for systemic risk detection and mitigation," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(4), pages 1-31, December.
    18. Tobias Fissler & Yannick Hoga, 2024. "How to Compare Copula Forecasts?," Papers 2410.04165, arXiv.org.
    19. Diba Daraei & Kristina Sendova, 2024. "Determining Safe Withdrawal Rates for Post-Retirement via a Ruin-Theory Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-21, April.
    20. Nevrla, Matěj, 2020. "Systemic risk in European financial and energy sectors: Dynamic factor copula approach," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(4).
    21. Kanno, Masayasu, 2020. "Interconnectedness and systemic risk in the US CDS market," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.09456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.