IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2609.22052.html

Design and pricing of a transparent parametric-modeled loss CAT bond: application to German windstorm

Author

Listed:
  • John Ery
  • Erwan Koch

Abstract

Catastrophe (cat) bonds overcome some lack of reinsurance by sourcing capacity from the wider capital markets. We present a new type of cat bond addressing the known trade-off between moral hazard and basis risk. As our main contributions we propose a trigger mechanism which is entirely transparent and simpler to evaluate compared to indemnity modeling techniques, as well as a methodology to price this cat bond. This is relevant for insurers and public authorities in a world where natural disasters are occurring with increasing frequency and severity due to climate change, but also for players willing to enter the cat bond market for whom the lack of transparency of this asset class has been a significant obstacle. Our trigger is derived from a cost random field which separates the physical hazard, a vulnerability function and the exposure. This allows the trigger to take a flexible form between parametric and modeled loss, in case exposure is taken into account. We present a case study based on historical windstorm events impacting Germany. Using wind speed data from historical storms, we fit a max-stable random field on a resolution which is standard in the reinsurance industry. The availability of industry loss and exposure data allows us to calibrate the vulnerability component to historical observations. Besides measuring the basis risk associated with our trigger, we perform a full model assessment and discuss numerical results.

Suggested Citation

  • John Ery & Erwan Koch, 2026. "Design and pricing of a transparent parametric-modeled loss CAT bond: application to German windstorm," Papers 2609.22052, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.22052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.22052
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Hua & Cummins, J. David, 2010. "Longevity bond premiums: The extreme value approach and risk cubic pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 150-161, February.
    2. Makariou, Despoina & Barrieu, Pauline & Chen, Yining, 2021. "A random forest based approach for predicting spreads in the primary catastrophe bond market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 140-162.
    3. Nowak, Piotr & Romaniuk, Maciej, 2013. "Pricing and simulations of catastrophe bonds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 18-28.
    4. Marcello Galeotti & Marc Gürtler & Christine Winkelvos, 2013. "Accuracy of Premium Calculation Models for CAT Bonds—An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 80(2), pages 401-421, June.
    5. V. Chavez‐Demoulin & A. C. Davison, 2005. "Generalized additive modelling of sample extremes," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 54(1), pages 207-222, January.
    6. R. Huser & A. C. Davison, 2014. "Space–time modelling of extreme events," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 76(2), pages 439-461, March.
    7. Lane, Morton N., 2000. "Pricing Risk Transfer Transactions1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 30(2), pages 259-293, November.
    8. J. David Cummins, 2008. "CAT Bonds and Other Risk‐Linked Securities: State of the Market and Recent Developments," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 11(1), pages 23-47, March.
    9. Martin Schlather, 2003. "A dependence measure for multivariate and spatial extreme values: Properties and inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(1), pages 139-156, March.
    10. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2020. "Improving CAT bond pricing models via machine learning," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(5), pages 428-446, September.
    11. Egami, Masahiko & Young, Virginia R., 2008. "Indifference prices of structured catastrophe (CAT) bonds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 771-778, April.
    12. Wang, Shaun S., 2002. "A Universal Framework for Pricing Financial and Insurance Risks," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(2), pages 213-234, November.
    13. R de Fondeville & A C Davison, 2018. "High-dimensional peaks-over-threshold inference," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 105(3), pages 575-592.
    14. Schmock, Uwe, 1999. "Estimating the Value of the Wincat Coupons of the Winterthur Insurance Convertible Bond: A Study of the Model Risk1," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 29(1), pages 101-163, May.
    15. Cristiano Varin & Paolo Vidoni, 2005. "A note on composite likelihood inference and model selection," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 92(3), pages 519-528, September.
    16. Nadine Gatzert & Sebastian Pokutta & Nikolai Vogl, 2019. "Convergence Of Capital And Insurance Markets: Consistent Pricing Of Index‐Linked Catastrophe Loss Instruments," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 86(1), pages 39-72, March.
    17. Makariou, Despoina & Barrieu, Pauline & Chen, Yining, 2021. "A random forest based approach for predicting spreads in the primary catastrophe bond market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111529, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Maochao Xu & Yiying Zhang, 2021. "Data Breach CAT Bonds: Modeling and Pricing," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 543-561, November.
    19. Carolyn W. Chang & Jack S. K. Chang & Yalan Feng, 2020. "Pricing Options with Physically Based Exercise and Random Maturity," Journal of Insurance Issues, Western Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 43(1), pages 59-78.
    20. Ben Ammar, Semir & Braun, Alexander & Eling, Martin, 2015. "Alternative Risk Transfer and Insurance-Linked Securities: Trends, Challenges and New Market Opportunities," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 56, number 56.
    21. Marc Gürtler & Martin Hibbeln & Christine Winkelvos, 2016. "The Impact of the Financial Crisis and Natural Catastrophes on CAT Bonds," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(3), pages 579-612, September.
    22. Hua Chen & Samuel H. Cox, 2009. "Modeling Mortality With Jumps: Applications to Mortality Securitization," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 76(3), pages 727-751, September.
    23. Alexander Braun, 2016. "Pricing in the Primary Market for Cat Bonds: New Empirical Evidence," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(4), pages 811-847, December.
    24. Yijia Lin & Samuel H. Cox, 2005. "Securitization of Mortality Risks in Life Annuities," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 72(2), pages 227-252, June.
    25. A. N. Pettitt, 1979. "A Non‐Parametric Approach to the Change‐Point Problem," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 28(2), pages 126-135, June.
    26. Papachristou, Dimitris, 2011. "Statistiscal Analysis of the Spreads of Catastrophe Bonds at the Time of Issue," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 251-277, May.
    27. Lin, Yijia & Cox, Samuel H., 2008. "Securitization of catastrophe mortality risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 628-637, April.
    28. Samuel Cox & Hal Pedersen, 2000. "Catastrophe Risk Bonds," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 56-82.
    29. Carolyn W. Chang & Jack S. K. Chang & Min-Teh Yu, 2022. "Pricing Hurricane Bonds Using a Physically Based Option Pricing Approach," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 27-42, January.
    30. Padoan, S. A. & Ribatet, M. & Sisson, S. A., 2010. "Likelihood-Based Inference for Max-Stable Processes," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(489), pages 263-277.
    31. Tang, Qihe & Yuan, Zhongyi, 2019. "Cat Bond Pricing Under A Product Probability Measure With Pot Risk Characterization," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 457-490, May.
    32. Koch, Erwan & Robert, Christian Y., 2022. "Stochastic derivative estimation for max-stable random fields," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(2), pages 575-588.
    33. Michel Denuit & Pierre Devolder & Anne‐Cécile Goderniaux, 2007. "Securitization of Longevity Risk: Pricing Survivor Bonds With Wang Transform in the Lee‐Carter Framework," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 74(1), pages 87-113, March.
    34. Zhu, Wenge, 2011. "Ambiguity aversion and an intertemporal equilibrium model of catastrophe-linked securities pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 38-46, July.
    35. repec:cup:astinb:v:26:y:1996:i:01:p:71-92_00 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Xin, 2026. "Catastrophe bond pricing with extreme value index as a parametric trigger," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Hua Chen & Richard D. MacMinn & Tao Sun, 2017. "Mortality Dependence and Longevity Bond Pricing: A Dynamic Factor Copula Mortality Model With the GAS Structure," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 84(S1), pages 393-415, April.
    3. Min Zheng, 2015. "Heterogeneous Expectations and Speculative Behavior in Insurance-Linked Securities," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-12, March.
    4. Dixon Domfeh & Arpita Chatterjee & Matthew Dixon, 2022. "A Unified Bayesian Framework for Pricing Catastrophe Bond Derivatives," Papers 2205.04520, arXiv.org.
    5. Tobias Götze & Marc Gürtler & Eileen Witowski, 2023. "Forecasting accuracy of machine learning and linear regression: evidence from the secondary CAT bond market," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(9), pages 1629-1660, November.
    6. Denis-Alexandre Trottier & Van Son Lai & Anne-Sophie Charest, 2017. "CAT Bond Spreads Via HARA Utility and Nonparametric Tests," Working Papers 2017-002, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.
    7. Makariou, Despoina & Barrieu, Pauline & Chen, Yining, 2021. "A random forest based approach for predicting spreads in the primary catastrophe bond market," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(PB), pages 140-162.
    8. Eckhard Platen & David Taylor, 2016. "Loading Pricing of Catastrophe Bonds and Other Long-Dated, Insurance-Type Contracts," Research Paper Series 379, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
    9. Götze, Tobias & Gürtler, Marc, 2020. "Risk transfer and moral hazard: An examination on the market for insurance-linked securities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 758-777.
    10. Wulan Anggraeni & Sudradjat Supian & Sukono & Nurfadhlina Binti Abdul Halim, 2022. "Earthquake Catastrophe Bond Pricing Using Extreme Value Theory: A Mini-Review Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(22), pages 1-22, November.
    11. Bahl, Raj Kumari & Sabanis, Sotirios, 2021. "Model-independent price bounds for Catastrophic Mortality Bonds," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 276-291.
    12. Li, Johnny Siu-Hang, 2010. "Pricing longevity risk with the parametric bootstrap: A maximum entropy approach," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 176-186, October.
    13. Burnecki, Krzysztof & Giuricich, Mario Nicoló & Palmowski, Zbigniew, 2019. "Valuation of contingent convertible catastrophe bonds — The case for equity conversion," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 238-254.
    14. Sukono & Hafizan Juahir & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Moch Panji Agung Saputra & Yuyun Hidayat & Igif Gimin Prihanto, 2022. "Application of Compound Poisson Process in Pricing Catastrophe Bonds: A Systematic Literature Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Peter Carayannopoulos & Olga Kanj & M. Fabricio Perez, 2022. "Pricing dynamics in the market for catastrophe bonds," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(1), pages 172-202, January.
    16. Alexander Braun, 2016. "Pricing in the Primary Market for Cat Bonds: New Empirical Evidence," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 83(4), pages 811-847, December.
    17. Chen, Hua & Cummins, J. David, 2010. "Longevity bond premiums: The extreme value approach and risk cubic pricing," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 150-161, February.
    18. Jacek Wszo{l}a & Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek Teuerle & Martyna Zdeb, 2025. "Design and valuation of multi-region CoCoCat bonds," Papers 2510.17221, arXiv.org.
    19. Xiaowei Chen & Hong Li & Yufan Lu & Rui Zhou, 2024. "Unveiling Nonlinear Dynamics in Catastrophe Bond Pricing: A Machine Learning Perspective," Papers 2405.00697, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    20. Ben Ammar, Semir & Braun, Alexander & Eling, Martin, 2015. "Alternative Risk Transfer and Insurance-Linked Securities: Trends, Challenges and New Market Opportunities," I.VW HSG Schriftenreihe, University of St.Gallen, Institute of Insurance Economics (I.VW-HSG), volume 56, number 56.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2609.22052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.