IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.21128.html

Structural Estimation of Marketing Mix Model Parameters from Geo-Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Niklas Heusch

Abstract

Marketing Mix Models (MMMs) are widely used for marketing measurement and budget allocation, but face fundamental identification challenges: due to endogenous marketing spend decisions, MMM estimation on observational time-series data cannot recover the true causal effects of marketing. On the other hand, geo-experiments provide causal identification through randomization, but it is not clear how to use them efficiently to calibrate marketing mix models. We propose a novel structural estimation approach that recovers the complete set of MMM parameters - adstock decay ($\alpha$), saturation ($\lambda$), and effectiveness ($\beta$) - directly from geo-experimental time-series. By differencing outcomes between treatment and control regions, our method eliminates observed and unobserved confounding factors while preserving the temporal variation that identifies each parameter. We demonstrate on synthetic data that this approach recovers the true ROAS and the response curve over the range of spending covered by the experiments, together with credible estimates of the underlying parameters. Our framework enables efficient pooling across multiple experiments and provides a principled foundation for MMM calibration that fully utilizes the information experiments contain.

Suggested Citation

  • Niklas Heusch, 2026. "Structural Estimation of Marketing Mix Model Parameters from Geo-Experiments," Papers 2608.21128, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.21128
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brett R. Gordon & Robert Moakler & Florian Zettelmeyer, 2023. "Close Enough? A Large-Scale Exploration of Non-Experimental Approaches to Advertising Measurement," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 768-793, July.
    2. Ryan Dew & Nicolas Padilla & Anya Shchetkina, 2024. "Your MMM is Broken: Identification of Nonlinear and Time-varying Effects in Marketing Mix Models," Papers 2408.07678, arXiv.org.
    3. Brett R. Gordon & Florian Zettelmeyer & Neha Bhargava & Dan Chapsky, 2019. "A Comparison of Approaches to Advertising Measurement: Evidence from Big Field Experiments at Facebook," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 193-225, March.
    4. Abadie, Alberto & Diamond, Alexis & Hainmueller, Jens, 2010. "Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California’s Tobacco Control Program," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 105(490), pages 493-505.
    5. Niklas Heusch, 2026. "A Synthetic Benchmark Dataset with Endogenous Marketing Spend for Validating Marketing Mix Models," Papers 2608.21130, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cawley, John & Eddelbuettel, Julia & Cunningham, Scott & Eisenberg, Matthew D. & Mathios, Alan D. & Avery, Rosemary J., 2025. "The role of repugnance in markets: How the Jared Fogle scandal affected patronage of subway," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    2. Tsung-Yiou Hsieh & Rex Yuxing Du & Shijie Lu, 2026. "Leveraging Large-Scale Granular Single-Source Data for TV Advertising: An Identification Strategy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(3), pages 632-652, May.
    3. Brett R. Gordon & Robert Moakler & Florian Zettelmeyer, 2023. "Predicted Incrementality by Experimentation (PIE) for Ad Measurement," Papers 2304.06828, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    4. Ali Goli & Jason Huang & David Reiley & Nickolai M. Riabov, 2025. "Measuring consumer sensitivity to audio advertising: a long-run field experiment on Pandora internet radio," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 347-377, September.
    5. Caio Waisman & Brett R. Gordon, 2023. "Multicell experiments for marginal treatment effect estimation of digital ads," Papers 2302.13857, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    6. Weijia Dai & Hyunjin Kim & Michael Luca, 2023. "Frontiers: Which Firms Gain from Digital Advertising? Evidence from a Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(3), pages 429-439, May.
    7. Gordon Burtch & Robert Moakler & Brett R. Gordon & Poppy Zhang & Shawndra Hill, 2025. "Characterizing and Minimizing Divergent Delivery in Meta Advertising Experiments," Papers 2508.21251, arXiv.org.
    8. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2026. "Estimating Causal Effects With Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 77(2), pages 356-382, June.
    9. Korkames, Joseph & Stanley, T.D. & Stremersch, Stefan, 2026. "Meta-analysis of advertising effectiveness: New insights from improved bias corrections," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(1), pages 131-151.
    10. Ali Goli & Jason Huang & David Reiley & Nickolai M. Riabov, 2024. "Measuring Consumer Sensitivity to Audio Advertising: A Long-Run Field Experiment on Pandora Internet Radio," Papers 2412.05516, arXiv.org.
    11. Berman, Ron & Heller, Yuval, 2025. "Naive analytics: The strategic advantage of algorithmic heuristics," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 62-78.
    12. Lemmens, Aurélie & Roos, Jason M.T. & Gabel, Sebastian & Ascarza, Eva & Bruno, Hernán A. & Gordon, Brett R. & Israeli, Ayelet & McDonnell Feit, Elea & Mela, Carl F. & Netzer, Oded, 2026. "Personalization and targeting: how to experiment, learn & optimize," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 537-559.
    13. Daniel Guhl & Friederike Paetz & Udo Wagner & Michel Wedel, 2024. "Predicting and optimizing marketing performance in dynamic markets," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(1), pages 1-27, March.
    14. Paul B. Ellickson & Wreetabrata Kar & James C. Reeder, 2023. "Estimating Marketing Component Effects: Double Machine Learning from Targeted Digital Promotions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 42(4), pages 704-728, July.
    15. Julian Runge & Koen Pauwels, 2026. "Open-Source Media and Marketing Mix Modeling: Practice-Oriented Overview, Challenges, Opportunities," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    16. Castro, P. & Pedroso, R. & Lautenbach, S. & Vicens, R., 2020. "Farmland abandonment in Rio de Janeiro: Underlying and contributory causes of an announced development," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    17. Qiuyue Xia & Lu Li & Jie Dong & Bin Zhang, 2021. "Reduction Effect and Mechanism Analysis of Carbon Trading Policy on Carbon Emissions from Land Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    18. Cruz A. Echevarría & Serhat Hasancebi & Javier García-Enríquez, 2022. "Economic Effects of Macao’s Integration with Mainland China: A Causal Inference Study," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 37(2), pages 179-215.
    19. Nicolaj N. Mühlbach, 2020. "Tree-based Synthetic Control Methods: Consequences of moving the US Embassy," CREATES Research Papers 2020-04, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    20. Daniel Albalate & Germà Bel & Ferran A. Mazaira-Font, 2020. "Ensuring Stability, Accuracy and Meaningfulness in Synthetic Control Methods: The Regularized SHAP-Distance Method," IREA Working Papers 202005, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Apr 2020.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.21128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.