IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2608.18283.html

The Fragility of Social Learning with Noisy Messages

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew O. Jackson
  • Suraj Malladi
  • David McAdams

Abstract

We examine how agents learn when information from original sources only reaches them after noisy relay. A receiver learns if and only if they have access to sufficiently many chains of noisy relay and they perfectly understand the noise process. However, even slight uncertainty over message mutation rates makes learning from long chains impossible, no matter how many independent sources are accessed.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew O. Jackson & Suraj Malladi & David McAdams, 2026. "The Fragility of Social Learning with Noisy Messages," Papers 2608.18283, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.18283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2608.18283
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T Renee Bowen & Danil Dmitriev & Simone Galperti, 2023. "Learning from Shared News: When Abundant Information Leads to Belief Polarization," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 955-1000.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andreas Grunewald & Andreas Klümper & Matthias Kräkel, 2025. "On The Impact Of Information Manipulation In Democratic Elections," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 66(3), pages 1043-1077, August.
    2. Ing-Haw Cheng & Alice Hsiaw, 2023. "Bayesian Doublespeak," Working Papers 135, Brandeis School of Business and Economics.
    3. Gonzalo Cisternas & Jorge Vásquez, 2022. "Misinformation in Social Media: The Role of Verification Incentives," Staff Reports 1028, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    4. Ely, Jeffrey C., 0. "Ruth, anthony, and clarence," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.
    5. Ke, Shaowei & Wu, Brian & Zhao, Chen, 2024. "Learning from a black box," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Ambrocio, Gene, 2020. "Inflationary household uncertainty shocks," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 5/2020, Bank of Finland.
    7. Levi, Eugenio & Bayerlein, Michael & Grimalda, Gianluca & Reggiani, Tommaso G., 2025. "Narratives of Migration and Political Polarization: Private Preferences, Public Preferences and Social Media," IZA Discussion Papers 17749, IZA Network @ LISER.
    8. Ambrocio, Gene & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2022. "Belief polarization and Covid-19," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 10/2022, Bank of Finland.
    9. José María Durán-Cabré & Alejandro Esteller-Moré & Riccardo Secomandi, 2025. "Is the revealed price of democracy biased?," Working Papers 2025/04, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).
    10. Prabal Roy Chowdhury, 2024. "Persuasion in social media: smoke and mirrors," Discussion Papers 24-03, Indian Statistical Institute, Delhi.
    11. Wu, Dong & Zou, Fan, 2025. "Dominant design selected by users: Dynamic interaction and convergence of users," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    12. Nathan Goldstein & David Lagziel & Ohad Raveh, 2025. "Political Rational Inattention: A New Measure With an Application to Political Polarization," Working Papers 2511, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Department of Economics.
    13. Giampaolo Bonomi, 2024. "Divide and Diverge: Political Competition and the Organization of Conflict," Papers 2405.20564, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2026.
    14. Menéndez, Luis & Montolio, Daniel & Mueller, Hannes & Slataper, Francesco, 2025. "Breaking the Echo Chamber: Social Media Networks and Political Conflict," CEPR Discussion Papers 20559, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    15. Fernandes, Marcos R., 2023. "Confirmation bias in social networks," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 59-76.
    16. Dana Sisak & Philipp Denter, 2024. "Truth, Lies, and Social Ties: When Image Concerns Fuel Fake News," Papers 2410.19557, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2026.
    17. Gradwohl, Ronen & Heller, Yuval & Hillman, Arye, 2025. "How social media can undermine democracy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    18. Krishna Dasaratha & Kevin He, 2025. "Learning from Viral Content," PIER Working Paper Archive 25-021, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    19. John W.E. Cremin, 2025. "Too Much Information & The Death of Consensus," Working Papers hal-05421416, HAL.
    20. Monica A. Giovanniello, 2025. "Echo Chambers: Voter‐to‐Voter Communication and Political Competition," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 752-768, July.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2608.18283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.