IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.29583.html

Fund Competition under Conflicting ESG Rating Methodologies

Author

Listed:
  • Wanling Rudkin

Abstract

Competing ESG rating providers reward different portfolio attributes. This paper models funds that choose portfolios and fees for investors with heterogeneous ESG priorities. Portfolio changes can improve both providers' scores or favour one methodology over the other, and investor demand determines which methodology each fund targets. Greater disagreement makes provider-specific positioning more productive but common improvement less productive. Funds therefore specialise more, yet both provider scores, investor participation, and equilibrium fees fall in the benchmark equilibrium. Investor heterogeneity creates matching gains from specialisation, while common improvement supports holdings-based ESG exposure. Methodology convergence improves participation and common exposure but weakens matching across investor clienteles. Convergence raises welfare when the social value of common exposure is sufficiently high.

Suggested Citation

  • Wanling Rudkin, 2026. "Fund Competition under Conflicting ESG Rating Methodologies," Papers 2607.29583, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.29583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.29583
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lai, Fu-Chuan, 2001. "Sequential locations in directional markets," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 535-546, September.
    2. Gantchev, Nickolay & Giannetti, Mariassunta & Li, Rachel, 2024. "Sustainability or performance? Ratings and fund managers’ incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    3. Pástor, Ľuboš & Stambaugh, Robert F. & Taylor, Lucian A., 2021. "Sustainable investing in equilibrium," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 550-571.
    4. Samuel M. Hartzmark & Abigail B. Sussman, 2019. "Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(6), pages 2789-2837, December.
    5. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Lioui, Abraham & Tarelli, Andrea, 2022. "Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 642-664.
    6. Marco Ceccarelli & Stefano Ramelli & Alexander F Wagner, 2024. "Low Carbon Mutual Funds," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 28(1), pages 45-74.
    7. Guercio, Diane Del & Tkac, Paula A., 2008. "Star Power: The Effect of Monrningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 907-936, December.
    8. Florian Berg & Julian F Kölbel & Roberto Rigobon, 2022. "Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings [Corporate social responsibility and firm risk: theory and empirical evidence]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 26(6), pages 1315-1344.
    9. Wahal, Sunil & Wang, Albert (Yan), 2011. "Competition among mutual funds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 40-59, January.
    10. Shujing Li & Jiaping Qiu, 2014. "Financial Product Differentiation over the State Space in the Mutual Fund Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 508-520, February.
    11. Ali Hortaçsu & Chad Syverson, 2004. "Product Differentiation, Search Costs, and Competition in the Mutual Fund Industry: A Case Study of S&P 500 Index Funds," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 119(2), pages 403-456.
    12. Pierre Chaigneau & Nicolas Sahuguet, 2025. "Executive compensation with environmental and social performance," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 29(3), pages 779-818.
    13. Pedersen, Lasse Heje & Fitzgibbons, Shaun & Pomorski, Lukasz, 2021. "Responsible investing: The ESG-efficient frontier," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 572-597.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Candelon, Bertrand & Hasse, Jean-Baptiste, 2026. "ESG Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2026001, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).
    2. Abdulrahman Qadi & Akash Sharma & Francesca Medda, 2026. "The Price of Permission: Classification Uncertainty in Constrained Capital Markets," Papers 2608.12634, arXiv.org.
    3. Li, Qianqian & Watts, Edward M. & Zhu, Christina, 2024. "Retail investors and ESG news," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(2).
    4. Nakagawa, Kei & Morita, Keisuke & Sakemoto, Ryuta, 2025. "Stochastic ESG scores and nonpecuniary ESG preferences: An extension to CAPM," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    5. Alves, Rómulo & Krüger, Philipp & van Dijk, Mathijs, 2025. "Drawing up the bill: Are ESG ratings related to stock returns around the world?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Avramov, Doron & Cheng, Si & Tarelli, Andrea, 2026. "Active fund management when ESG matters," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Cheng, Louis T.W. & Cheong, Tsun Se & Wojewodzki, Michal & Chui, David, 2025. "The effect of ESG divergence on the financial performance of Hong Kong-listed firms: An artificial neural network approach," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(PA).
    8. Yin, Libo & Zhu, Xiaoye & Su, Zhi & Guo, Hongliang, 2025. "Is disagreement beneficial for market efficiency? Evidence from ESG ratings," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    9. Rabab Abouarab & Tapas Mishra & Simon Wolfe, 2025. "Spotting Portfolio Greenwashing in Environmental Funds," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(4), pages 811-839, April.
    10. Huij, Joop & Laurs, Dries & van Zanten, Jan Anton, 2025. "The investment implications of sustainable investing," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    11. Agoraki, Maria-Eleni K. & Kouretas, Georgios P. & Wu, Haoran & Zhao, Binru, 2025. "Imbalanced ESG investing?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    12. Alkan, Doga & Ayari, Rayan & Paraschiv, Florentina, 2026. "Green fees: Sustainability impacts on portfolio management," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Herforth, Anna-Lena & Kirschenmann, Karolin & Ravanbakhshhabibabadi, Monireh, 2025. "Financing the green transition: The role of private capital," ZEW policy briefs 04/2025, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Minxuan Hu & Jiayu Yi & Ziheng Chen & Wenxi Sun & Qishi Zhan, 2026. "Stress Amplified Resilience: ESG and Joint Fragility in Equity Markets," Papers 2606.05631, arXiv.org.
    15. Birk, Kevin & Rohleder, Martin & Weh, René & Wilkens, Marco, 2026. "The performance of low-carbon equity funds," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    16. Janssen, Bennet & Zhang, Youpeng, 2025. "Do retail investors care about ESG ratings?," ZEW Discussion Papers 25-074, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Konrad Adler & Oliver Rehbein & Matthias Reiner & Jing Zeng, 2026. "Market-Based Green Firms," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 421, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    18. Lars Hornuf & Christoph Merkle & Stefan Zeisberger, 2026. "Defaulting Investors Toward Sustainability: A Field Experiment," CESifo Working Paper Series 12733, CESifo.
    19. Ferriani, Fabrizio, 2023. "Issuing bonds during the Covid-19 pandemic: Was there an ESG premium?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    20. Aineas Mallios & Taylan Mavruk, 2025. "Do ESG funds engage in portfolio pumping to gain higher flows? An application of Benford's Law," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 1540-1563, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.29583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.