IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.27553.html

AI and Its Impact on Creativity and Diversity: An Empirical Study of LLM-Generated Product Ideas

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Terwiesch
  • Lennart Meincke
  • Karan Girotra
  • Ethan Mollick
  • Gideon Nave
  • Karl T. Ulrich

Abstract

This research examines how well large language models, or LLMs, generate new product ideas for college students priced under $50. Across a series of studies, we identify key strengths and weaknesses of using LLMs for product innovation. Our first study shows that LLM-generated product ideas have higher average quality than human ideas, based on purchase intent, and are 7 times more likely to rank in the top 10%. Our second study shows that this AI-induced creativity boost is not explained by the LLM's more persuasive pitching skills. Our third and fourth studies identify a weakness of using LLMs for brainstorming: AI-generated ideas are less novel at the idea level and less diverse at the set level. In our fifth study, we analyze prior LLM-based creativity studies and find consistently lower idea diversity across all of them, demonstrating the generalizability of these findings. Our sixth and seventh studies investigate techniques to mitigate this diversity loss. We compare LLMs from different vendors and versions and find that more recent models generate more diverse ideas, though they still fall short of human-level diversity. We also demonstrate techniques that increase idea diversity almost to the level of human idea generation: pooling ideas across vendors; prompt engineering, including Chain-of-Thought prompting and injecting heterogeneous personas or constraints; and creative agents that broadly explore the solution landscape to restore diversity. Finally, in our eighth study, we show that exploiting the near-zero marginal cost of AI idea generation by scaling the number of ideas steadily improves coverage of the idea space, approaching human-level coverage. We conclude by presenting actionable recommendations for innovation managers who want to identify better new product ideas with the help of LLMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Terwiesch & Lennart Meincke & Karan Girotra & Ethan Mollick & Gideon Nave & Karl T. Ulrich, 2026. "AI and Its Impact on Creativity and Diversity: An Empirical Study of LLM-Generated Product Ideas," Papers 2607.27553, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.27553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.27553
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lennart Meincke & Gideon Nave & Christian Terwiesch, 2025. "ChatGPT decreases idea diversity in brainstorming," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(6), pages 1107-1109, June.
    2. Sotaro Shibayama & Deyun Yin & Kuniko Matsumoto, 2021. "Measuring novelty in science with word embedding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Francesco Salvi & Manoel Horta Ribeiro & Riccardo Gallotti & Robert West, 2025. "On the conversational persuasiveness of GPT-4," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 9(8), pages 1645-1653, August.
    4. Jürgen Mihm & Jochen Schlapp, 2019. "Sourcing Innovation: On Feedback in Contests," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(2), pages 559-576, February.
    5. Byung Cheol Lee & Jaeyeon (Jae) Chung, 2024. "An empirical investigation of the impact of ChatGPT on creativity," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1906-1914, October.
    6. Hui Bai & Jan G. Voelkel & Shane Muldowney & Johannes C. Eichstaedt & Robb Willer, 2025. "LLM-generated messages can persuade humans on policy issues," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Joel O. Wooten & Karl T. Ulrich, 2017. "Idea Generation and the Role of Feedback: Evidence from Field Experiments with Innovation Tournaments," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(1), pages 80-99, January.
    8. Léonard Boussioux & Jacqueline N. Lane & Miaomiao Zhang & Vladimir Jacimovic & Karim R. Lakhani, 2024. "The Crowdless Future? Generative AI and Creative Problem-Solving," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(5), pages 1589-1607, September.
    9. Laura J. Kornish & Karl T. Ulrich, 2011. "Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 107-128, January.
    10. Fabrizio Dell’Acqua & Edward McFowland & Ethan Mollick & Hila Lifshitz & Katherine C. Kellogg & Saran Rajendran & Lisa Krayer & François Candelon & Karim R. Lakhani, 2026. "Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 403-423, March.
    11. Karan Girotra & Christian Terwiesch & Karl T. Ulrich, 2010. "Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 591-605, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pedota, Mattia & Cicala, Francesco & Basti, Alessio, 2024. "A Wild Mind with a Disciplined Eye: Unleashing Human-GenAI Creativity Through Simulated Entity Elicitation," OSF Preprints 3bn95, Center for Open Science.
    2. Pedota, Mattia & Cicala, Francesco & Basti, Alessio, 2025. "Human agents, generative AI, and innovation: A formal model of hybrid creative process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Niek Althuizen & Bo Chen, 2022. "Crowdsourcing Ideas Using Product Prototypes: The Joint Effect of Prototype Enhancement and the Product Design Goal on Idea Novelty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 3008-3025, April.
    4. repec:osf:osfxxx:3bn95_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Simon Kleinert & Silvio Vismara, 2026. "The reconfiguration of entrepreneurship: how digital platforms and artificial intelligence transform the entrepreneurial process," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, March.
    6. Tat Koon Koh & Muller Y. M. Cheung, 2022. "Seeker Exemplars and Quantitative Ideation Outcomes in Crowdsourcing Contests," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 265-284, March.
    7. Zhou, Yiyong & Liu, Qinghan & Huang, Jihao & Li, Guiquan, 2026. "Creative scar without generative AI: Individual creativity fails to sustain while homogeneity keeps climbing," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    8. Tat Koon Koh, 2025. "“Optimal” Feedback Use in Crowdsourcing Contests: Source Effect and Priming Intervention," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 1489-1508, July.
    9. Pallab Sanyal & Shun Ye, 2024. "An Examination of the Dynamics of Crowdsourcing Contests: Role of Feedback Type," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 394-413, March.
    10. Lakshminarayana Nittala & Sanjiv Erat & Vish Krishnan, 2022. "Designing internal innovation contests," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 1963-1976, May.
    11. Zhaohui (Zoey) Jiang & Yan Huang & Damian R. Beil, 2022. "The Role of Feedback in Dynamic Crowdsourcing Contests: A Structural Empirical Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4858-4877, July.
    12. Jörg Claussen & Maria A. Halbinger & Lior Zalmanson, 2026. "Challenge Accepted: The Effects of Contest Participation on a User-Generated Content Community," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 421-439, March.
    13. Salgado, Stéphane & Hemonnet-Goujot, Aurelie & Henard, David H. & de Barnier, Virginie, 2020. "The dynamics of innovation contest experience: An integrated framework from the customer’s perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 29-43.
    14. Barry L. Bayus, 2013. "Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 226-244, June.
    15. Hossain, Mokter, 2018. "Motivations, challenges, and opportunities of successful solvers on an innovation intermediary platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 67-73.
    16. Laura J. Kornish & Sharaya M. Jones, 2021. "Raw Ideas in the Fuzzy Front End: Verbosity Increases Perceived Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 40(6), pages 1106-1122, November.
    17. Irlenbusch, Bernd & Laske, Katharina & Schröder, Marina & Stoczek, Rika, 2026. "An experimental study on the effect of knowledge on idea generation and idea selection," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 141263, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Julian De Freitas & Ayelet Israeli & Gideon Nave & Artem Timoshenko & Olivier Toubia, 2026. "Innovating with Generative AI: A Human Bottleneck Framework," Papers 2608.07504, arXiv.org.
    19. Sunkee Lee & Manuel E. Sosa, 2026. "Spaces for Creativity: Unconventional Workspaces and Divergent Thinking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1072-1094, February.
    20. Zhaohui (Zoey) Jiang & Yan Huang & Damian R. Beil, 2021. "The Role of Problem Specification in Crowdsourcing Contests for Design Problems: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 637-656, May.
    21. Laura J. Kornish & Jeremy Hutchison‐Krupat, 2017. "Research on Idea Generation and Selection: Implications for Management of Technology," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(4), pages 633-651, April.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.27553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.