IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2607.06153.html

From Gravity to Confinement: Wealth Redistribution as Optimal Drift Design in the Fokker-Planck Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Anders G Fr{o}seth

Abstract

A proportional wealth tax acts as a uniform gravitational field on the wealth distribution: it shifts the drift of the Fokker-Planck equation without altering the diffusion, preserving the Gini coefficient at all finite times. The same drift-shift symmetry that makes the tax non-distortionary also makes it non-redistributive through the market channel. Redistribution requires breaking this symmetry. A progressive tax (confining potential) replaces the Pareto steady state with a thinner-tailed distribution whose Gini is a closed-form function of the progressivity parameter; source-sink terms (tax-funded transfers) reshape the density directly. We formulate optimal redistribution as a control problem for the Fokker-Planck equation, penalising intervention costs including migration, evasion, and portfolio distortion. In general equilibrium the tax design feeds back through aggregate capital and the production function, yielding a self-consistent McKean-Vlasov equation with diminishing returns to progressivity. The spectral gap of the Fokker-Planck operator determines convergence speed: progressive taxes redistribute within policy-relevant timescales, whereas proportional taxes rely on slow demographic turnover.

Suggested Citation

  • Anders G Fr{o}seth, 2026. "From Gravity to Confinement: Wealth Redistribution as Optimal Drift Design in the Fokker-Planck Framework," Papers 2607.06153, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.06153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2607.06153
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Marc Mezard, 2000. "Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy," Science & Finance (CFM) working paper archive 500026, Science & Finance, Capital Fund Management.
    2. Charles I. Jones, 2015. "Pareto and Piketty: The Macroeconomics of Top Income and Wealth Inequality," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 29(1), pages 29-46, Winter.
    3. Per Krusell & Anthony A. Smith & Jr., 1998. "Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 106(5), pages 867-896, October.
    4. Chatterjee, Arnab & K. Chakrabarti, Bikas & Manna, S.S, 2004. "Pareto law in a kinetic model of market with random saving propensity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 335(1), pages 155-163.
    5. Andreas Fagereng & Luigi Guiso & Davide Malacrino & Luigi Pistaferri, 2020. "Heterogeneity and Persistence in Returns to Wealth," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(1), pages 115-170, January.
    6. Adrian Dragulescu & Victor M. Yakovenko, 2000. "Statistical mechanics of money," Papers cond-mat/0001432, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2000.
    7. Jess Benhabib & Alberto Bisin & Shenghao Zhu, 2011. "The Distribution of Wealth and Fiscal Policy in Economies With Finitely Lived Agents," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 123-157, January.
    8. Gabriel Zucman, 2024. "A blueprint for a coordinated minimum effective taxation standard for ultra-high-net-worth individuals," Reports 006, EU Tax Observatory.
    9. Katrine Jakobsen & Kristian Jakobsen & Henrik Kleven & Gabriel Zucman, 2020. "Wealth Taxation and Wealth Accumulation: Theory and Evidence From Denmark," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 135(1), pages 329-388.
    10. Katrine Jakobsen & Henrik Kleven & Jonas Kolsrud & Camille Landais & Mathilde Muñoz, 2024. "Taxing Top Wealth: Migration Responses and their Aggregate Economic Implications," NBER Working Papers 32153, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Bouchaud, Jean-Philippe & Mézard, Marc, 2000. "Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 536-545.
    12. Arnab Chatterjee & Bikas K. Chakrabarti & S. S. Manna, 2003. "Pareto Law in a Kinetic Model of Market with Random Saving Propensity," Papers cond-mat/0301289, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2004.
    13. Maximilien Bernard & Jean-Philippe Bouchaud & Pierre Le Doussal, 2025. "A mean-field theory for heterogeneous random growth with redistribution," Papers 2503.23189, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    14. Xavier Gabaix, 1999. "Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(3), pages 739-767.
    15. Black, Fischer & Scholes, Myron S, 1973. "The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 81(3), pages 637-654, May-June.
    16. Marie Bjørneby & Simen Markussen & Knut Røed, 2023. "An imperfect wealth tax and employment in closely held firms," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 90(358), pages 557-583, April.
    17. Gabriel Zucman, 2024. "A blueprint for a coordinated minimum effective taxation standard for ultra-high-net-worth individuals," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-04947409, HAL.
    18. Fatih Guvenen & Gueorgui Kambourov & Burhan Kuruscu & Sergio Ocampo & Daphne Chen, 2023. "Use It or Lose It: Efficiency and Redistributional Effects of Wealth Taxation," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 138(2), pages 835-894.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Langenhove, Christophe & Lorenz, Jan & Schulz-Gebhard, Jan, 2026. "Wealth taxation, capital gains taxation and the inequality-mobility trade-off," BERG Working Paper Series 211, Bamberg University, Bamberg Economic Research Group.
    2. Anders G Fr{o}seth, 2026. "Extensions to the Wealth Tax Neutrality Framework," Papers 2603.05277, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2026.
    3. Gualandi, Stefano & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2018. "Pareto tails in socio-economic phenomena: A kinetic description," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal (2007-2020), Kiel Institute for the World Economy, vol. 12, pages 1-17.
    4. Lin, Chuandong & Cui, Lijie, 2026. "Kinetic modeling of wealth distribution under individual and collective transactions with heterogeneous saving propensities," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 681(C).
    5. Max Greenberg & H. Oliver Gao, 2024. "Twenty-five years of random asset exchange modeling," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 97(6), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Thomas Gottfried & Stefan Grosskinsky, 2025. "Wages and capital returns in a generalized Pólya urn," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 20(2), pages 477-518, April.
    7. Gualandi, Stefano & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2017. "Pareto tails in socio-economic phenomena: A kinetic description," Economics Discussion Papers 2017-111, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    8. Düring, Bertram & Matthes, Daniel & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2008. "A Boltzmann-type approach to the formation of wealth distribution curves," CoFE Discussion Papers 08/05, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    9. Düring, Bertram & Toscani, Giuseppe, 2008. "International and domestic trading and wealth distribution," CoFE Discussion Papers 08/02, University of Konstanz, Center of Finance and Econometrics (CoFE).
    10. Borba, Jhordan Silveira & Gonçalves, Sebastian & Anteneodo, Celia, 2025. "Inequality in a model of capitalist economy," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 664(C).
    11. D. S. Quevedo & C. J. Quimbay, 2019. "Piketty's second fundamental law of capitalism as an emergent property in a kinetic wealth-exchange model of economic growth," Papers 1903.00952, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    12. Anindya S. Chakrabarti, 2017. "Scale-free distribution as an economic invariant: a theoretical approach," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, April.
    13. De Rosa, Mauricio & Vilá, Joan, 2026. "Taxing the rich in Latin America: Effects of a wealth tax on revenue and distribution," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 1440-1466.
    14. Bagatella-Flores, N. & Rodríguez-Achach, M. & Coronel-Brizio, H.F. & Hernández-Montoya, A.R., 2015. "Wealth distribution of simple exchange models coupled with extremal dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 417(C), pages 168-175.
    15. Patriarca, Marco & Chakraborti, Anirban & Germano, Guido, 2006. "Influence of saving propensity on the power-law tail of the wealth distribution," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 369(2), pages 723-736.
    16. Lux, Thomas, 2008. "Applications of statistical physics in finance and economics," Kiel Working Papers 1425, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
    17. Düring, B. & Toscani, G., 2007. "Hydrodynamics from kinetic models of conservative economies," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 384(2), pages 493-506.
    18. Anders G Fr{o}seth, 2026. "Heterogeneous Returns and Wealth Tax Neutrality: A Fokker-Planck Framework," Papers 2603.16006, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    19. Anirban Chakraborti & Ioane Muni Toke & Marco Patriarca & Frédéric Abergel, 2011. "Econophysics review: II. Agent-based models," Post-Print hal-00621059, HAL.
    20. J. R. Iglesias & R. M. C. de Almeida, 2011. "Entropy and equilibrium state of free market models," Papers 1108.5725, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2607.06153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.