IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2606.07489.html

How AI Agents Reshape Knowledge Work: Autonomy, Efficiency, and Scope

Author

Listed:
  • Jeremy Yang
  • Kate Zyskowski
  • Noah Yonack
  • Jerry Ma

Abstract

Frontier AI systems are bridging the gap between intelligence and utility by shifting from conversational assistants to autonomous agents that execute tasks end to end. Using production data from Perplexity's Search and Computer products, we study this transition by examining how AI agents accelerate and reshape knowledge work. Three key empirical findings emerge. First, using sessions with near-identical initial query pairs as natural experiments for the same underlying task attempted with both products, Computer performs 26 minutes of autonomous work per user session, versus 33 seconds for Search. Computer automates task decomposition and execution that Search users might otherwise manually orchestrate and implement. As a result, Computer shifts follow-up query distribution toward higher-order work such as verification and extension. Autonomy also increases execution quality, with per-query dissatisfaction rates 55% lower on Computer than on Search. Second, due to its autonomy advantage, Computer reduces completion time from 269 to 36 minutes on matched tasks, lowering estimated time and cost by 87% and 94%, respectively, compared to humans equipped with Search alone. Third, Computer changes the scope of work that users attempt: Computer queries more often cross occupational boundaries, require higher-order cognition, draw on broader expertise, take the form of composite tasks that bundle interdependent subtasks into a single query, and unlock work activities that are essentially absent from Search usage among the same users. Together, the evidence indicates that AI agents accelerate workflows, enhance output quality, reduce costs, and expand the breadth and depth of automated work.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeremy Yang & Kate Zyskowski & Noah Yonack & Jerry Ma, 2026. "How AI Agents Reshape Knowledge Work: Autonomy, Efficiency, and Scope," Papers 2606.07489, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.07489
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2606.07489
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daron Acemoglu & Pascual Restrepo, 2019. "Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 3-30, Spring.
    2. Goodman-Bacon, Andrew, 2021. "Difference-in-differences with variation in treatment timing," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 225(2), pages 254-277.
    3. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(4), pages 1279-1333.
    4. Erik Brynjolfsson & Danielle Li & Lindsey Raymond, 2025. "Generative AI at Work," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 140(2), pages 889-942.
    5. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue nov.
    6. Fabrizio Dell’Acqua & Edward McFowland & Ethan Mollick & Hila Lifshitz & Katherine C. Kellogg & Saran Rajendran & Lisa Krayer & François Candelon & Karim R. Lakhani, 2026. "Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 403-423, March.
    7. Mert Demirer & Leon Musolff & Liyuan Yang, 2026. "Writing Code vs. Shipping Code: Productivity Effects Across Generations of AI Coding Tools," NBER Working Papers 35275, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Garicano, Luis & Li, Jin & Wu, Yanhui, 2026. "Weak Bundle, Strong Bundle: How AI Redraws Job Boundaries," CEPR Discussion Papers 21453, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Drew Johnston & David Holtz & Alex Martin Richmond & Christopher Ong & Prasanna Tambe & Aaron Chatterji, 2026. "The Shift to Agentic AI: Evidence from Codex," Papers 2606.26959, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Auyon Siddiq & Niuniu Zhang, 2026. "Human Capital, AI, and Labor Commoditization," Papers 2606.21880, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2026.
    2. Kiran Tomlinson & Sonia Jaffe & Will Wang & Scott Counts & Siddharth Suri, 2025. "Working with AI: Measuring the Applicability of Generative AI to Occupations," Papers 2507.07935, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2025.
    3. Seth Gordon Benzell & Kyle R. Myers, 2026. "Automation Experiments and Inequality," NBER Working Papers 34668, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Yibo Li & Haonan Li, 2026. "The benefits share of digital infrastructure," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 1-45, January.
    5. Yukun Zhang & Tianyang Zhang, 2026. "The Economics of Digital Intelligence Capital: Endogenous Depreciation and the Structural Jevons Paradox," Papers 2601.12339, arXiv.org.
    6. Barth, Erling & Davis, James C. & Freeman, Richard B. & McElheran, Kristina, 2023. "Twisting the demand curve: Digitalization and the older workforce," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 443-467.
    7. Nikolaos Charalampidis & Mananirina Razafitsiory, 2025. "Automation in an estimated small open economy model," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(3), pages 1017-1043, August.
    8. Gao, Fei & Peng, Benhong & Zhao, Yinyin & Wei, Guo, 2026. "Tech for Good: The employment effects of policy-driven artificial intelligence development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    9. Peeyush Agarwal & Harsh Agarwal & Akshat Rana, 2025. "What Work is AI Actually Doing? Uncovering the Drivers of Generative AI Adoption," Papers 2510.23669, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    10. Lipowski, Cäcilia & Salomons, Anna & Zierahn-Weilage, Ulrich, 2024. "Expertise at work: New technologies, new skills, and worker impacts," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-044, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    11. Chen, Qin & Ge, Jinfeng & Xie, Huaqing & Xu, Xingcheng & Yang, Yanqing, 2025. "Large language models at work in China’s labor market," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    12. Zhao, Dan & Tang, Ningyu & Hai, Shenyang & Zhao, Lijing, 2025. "Dual effects of AI-enabled job non-routinization on creativity: The moderating role of tacit knowledge awareness," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    13. Christian Gschwendt & Martina Viarengo & Thea S. Zoellner, 2026. "Generative AI and Career Choices," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0251, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    14. Xiliu He & Haoxiang Zhao & Mingyi Ma & Edward Wen Chuan Lai & Koei Enomoto & Anni Hu & Jiatong Li & Lingyun Chu & Yuan Lai, 2026. "Generative AI impacts on intra-urban inequality and skill premium in Beijing," Papers 2605.25505, arXiv.org.
    15. Xue Guo & Zhi (Aaron) Cheng & Paul A. Pavlou, 2025. "Skill-Biased Technical Change, Again? Online Gig Platforms and Local Employment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 1354-1374, September.
    16. Jung Ho Choi & Chloe L. Xie, 2026. "Human + AI in Accounting: Early Evidence from the Field," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 64(3), pages 1333-1373, June.
    17. Qin Chen & Jinfeng Ge & Huaqing Xie & Xingcheng Xu & Yanqing Yang, 2023. "Large Language Models at Work in China's Labor Market," Papers 2308.08776, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    18. Engberg, Erik & Koch, Michael & Lodefalk, Magnus & Schroeder, Sarah, 2025. "Artificial intelligence, tasks, skills, and wages: Worker-level evidence from Germany," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(8).
    19. Erin McGurk & David Khachaturov, 2026. "Human-Provenance Verification should be Treated as Labor Infrastructure in AI-Saturated Markets," Papers 2605.03210, arXiv.org.
    20. Prashant Garg & Tommaso Crosta & Jasmin Baier, 2026. "Global Automation Atlas," Papers 2605.17086, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2606.07489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.