IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2603.10867.html

Delegated Information Provision

Author

Listed:
  • Francesco Bilotta
  • Christoph Carnehl
  • Justus Preusser

Abstract

A designer relies on an experimenter to provide information to a decision maker, but the experimenter has incentives to persuade rather than merely transmit information. Anticipating this motive, the designer can restrict the set of admissible experiments, but cannot prevent the experimenter from garbling any admissible experiment. We model this situation as delegation over experiments. The optimal delegation set can be obtained by comparing maximally informative experiments among those the experimenter has no incentive to garble. When the experimenter's preferences are $S$-shaped, we fully characterize such experiments as double censorship. Relative to the full delegation outcome, upper censorship, double censorship features an intermediate pooling region, inducing a smaller pooling region for the highest states. We show that the designer strictly benefits from imposing a nontrivial delegation set to constrain the experimenter's ability to persuade while retaining valuable information provision.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesco Bilotta & Christoph Carnehl & Justus Preusser, 2026. "Delegated Information Provision," Papers 2603.10867, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.10867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.10867
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lipnowski, Elliot & Mathevet, Laurent & Wei, Dong, 2022. "Optimal attention management: A tractable framework," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 170-180.
    2. Ichihashi, Shota, 2019. "Limiting Sender's information in Bayesian persuasion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 276-288.
    3. Anton Kolotilin & Roberto Corrao & Alexander Wolitzky, 2025. "Persuasion and Matching: Optimal Productive Transport," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 133(4), pages 1334-1381.
    4. Jain, Vasudha & Whitmeyer, Mark, 2026. "Competitive disclosure of information to a rationally inattentive agent," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Onuchic, Paula & Ray, Debraj, 2023. "Conveying value via categories," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(4), November.
    6. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Extreme Points and Majorization: Economic Applications," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(4), pages 1557-1593, July.
    7. Le Treust, Maël & Tomala, Tristan, 2019. "Persuasion with limited communication capacity," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Qianjun Lyu & Wing Suen & Yimeng Zhang, 2023. "Coarse Information Design," Papers 2305.18020, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    9. Kolotilin, Anton & Mylovanov, Timofiy & Zapechelnyuk, Andriy, 2022. "Censorship as optimal persuasion," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
    10. Wei, Dong, 2021. "Persuasion under costly learning," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Maxim Ivanov, 2021. "Optimal monotone signals in Bayesian persuasion mechanisms," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 955-1000, October.
    12. Gregorio Curello & Ludvig Sinander, 2022. "The comparative statics of persuasion," Papers 2204.07474, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    13. Daniel Bird & Zvika Neeman, 2022. "What Should a Firm Know? Protecting Consumers' Privacy Rents," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(4), pages 257-295, November.
    14. Tymofiy Mylovanov & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2024. "Constructive versus Toxic Argumentation in Debates," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 16(1), pages 262-292, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matysková, Ludmila & Montes, Alfonso, 2023. "Bayesian persuasion with costly information acquisition," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    2. Emir Kamenica & Kyungmin Kim & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2021. "Bayesian persuasion and information design: perspectives and open issues," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(3), pages 701-704, October.
    3. Tsakas, Elias & Tsakas, Nikolas, 2021. "Noisy persuasion," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 44-61.
    4. Emir Kamenica & Xiao Lin, 2024. "Commitment and Randomization in Communication," PIER Working Paper Archive 24-033, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    5. Yiling Chen & Tao Lin & Wei Tang & Jamie Tucker-Foltz, 2025. "Explainable Information Design," Papers 2508.14196, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    6. Ozan Candogan & Philipp Strack, 2021. "Optimal Disclosure of Information to a Privately Informed Receiver," Papers 2101.10431, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    7. Qianjun Lyu & Wing Suen & Yimeng Zhang, 2023. "Coarse Information Design," Papers 2305.18020, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    8. Shipra Agrawal & Yiding Feng & Wei Tang, 2026. "Simple and Robust Quality Disclosure: The Power of Quantile Partition," Papers 2602.01066, arXiv.org.
    9. Andreas Kleiner & Benny Moldovanu & Philipp Strack & Mark Whitmeyer, 2024. "The Extreme Points of Fusions," Papers 2409.10779, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    10. Yaron Azrieli & Rachana Das, 2025. "Sequential Non-Bayesian Persuasion," Papers 2508.09464, arXiv.org.
    11. Kreutzkamp, Sophie & Lou, Yichuan, 2025. "Persuasion without ex-post commitment," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    12. Emir Kamenica & Xiao Lin, 2024. "Commitment and Randomization in Communication," Papers 2410.17503, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2025.
    13. Sergei Mikhalishchev & Vladimir Novak, 2024. "Inattention, Stability, and Reform Reluctance," Working and Discussion Papers WP 8/2024, Research Department, National Bank of Slovakia.
    14. Hedlund, Jonas, 2024. "Signaling through Bayesian persuasion," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 15-27.
    15. Koessler, Frederic & Laclau, Marie & Renault, Jérôme & Tomala, Tristan, 2022. "Long information design," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 17(2), May.
    16. Kocourek, Pavel & Steiner, Jakub & Stewart, Colin, 2024. "Boundedly rational demand," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 19(4), November.
    17. Anton Kolotilin & Andriy Zapechelnyuk, 2025. "Persuasion Meets Delegation," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 93(1), pages 195-228, January.
    18. Sosung Baik & Sung-Ha Hwang, 2021. "Auction design with ambiguity: Optimality of the first-price and all-pay auctions," Papers 2110.08563, arXiv.org.
    19. Beg, Sabrin & Islam, Mahnaz & Rahman, Khandker Wahedur, 2024. "Information and behavior: Evidence from fertilizer quantity recommendations in Bangladesh," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Frank Yang & Kai Hao Yang, 2025. "Multidimensional Monotonicity and Economic Applications," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2428, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2603.10867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.