IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2602.19841.html

Detecting and Explaining Unlawful Insider Trading: A Shapley Value and Causal Forest Approach to Identifying Key Drivers and Causal Relationships

Author

Listed:
  • Krishna Neupane
  • Igor Griva
  • Robert Axtell
  • William Kennedy
  • Jason Kinser

Abstract

Corporate insiders trade for diverse reasons, often possessing Material Non-Public Information (MNPI). Determining whether specific trades leverage MNPI is a significant challenge due to inherent complexity. This study focuses on two critical objectives: accurately detecting Unlawful Insider Trading (UIT) and identifying key features explaining classification. The analysis demonstrates how combining Shapley Values (SHAP) and Causal Forest (CF) reveals these explanatory drivers. The findings underscore the necessity of causality in identifying and interpreting UIT, requiring the consideration of alternative scenarios and potential outcomes. Within a high-dimensional feature space, the proposed architecture integrates state-of-the-art techniques to achieve high classification accuracy. The framework provides robust feature rankings via SHAP and causal significance assessments through CF, facilitating the discovery of unique causal relationships. Statistically significant relationships are documented between the outcome and several key features, including director status, price-to-book ratio, return, and market beta. These features significantly influence the likelihood of UIT, suggesting potential links between insider behavior and factors such as information asymmetry, valuation risk, market volatility, and stock performance. The analysis draws attention to the complexities of financial causality, noting that while initial descriptors offer intuitive insights, deeper examination is required to understand nuanced impacts. These findings reaffirm the architectural flexibility of decision tree models. By incorporating heterogeneity during tree construction, these models effectively uncover latent structures within trade, finance, and governance data, characterizing fraudulent behavior while maintaining reliable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Krishna Neupane & Igor Griva & Robert Axtell & William Kennedy & Jason Kinser, 2026. "Detecting and Explaining Unlawful Insider Trading: A Shapley Value and Causal Forest Approach to Identifying Key Drivers and Causal Relationships," Papers 2602.19841, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19841
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2602.19841
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Han‐Ching Huang & Pei‐Shan Tung, 2021. "Information content of insider filings after stock repurchase and seasoned equity issue announcements," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 2690-2712, April.
    2. Jacob, Daniel, 2021. "CATE meets ML: Conditional average treatment effect and machine learning," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2021-005, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    3. David Hirshleifer, 2001. "Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 1533-1597, August.
    4. Piotroski, JD, 2000. "Value investing: The use of historical financial statement information to separate winners from losers," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38, pages 1-41.
    5. Glosten, Lawrence R. & Milgrom, Paul R., 1985. "Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 71-100, March.
    6. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    7. Daniel Jacob, 2021. "CATE meets ML -- The Conditional Average Treatment Effect and Machine Learning," Papers 2104.09935, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2021.
    8. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:6:p:1839-1885 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Krishna Neupane & Igor Griva, 2024. "A Random Forest approach to detect and identify Unlawful Insider Trading," Papers 2411.13564, arXiv.org.
    10. Hiemstra Craig & Kramer Charles, 1997. "Nonlinearity and Endogeneity in Macro-Asset Pricing," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(3), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Gow, Ian D. & Larcker, David F. & Reiss, Peter C., 2016. "Causal Inference in Accounting Research," Research Papers 3393, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    12. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    13. Darren T. Roulstone, 2003. "The Relation Between Insider‐Trading Restrictions and Executive Compensation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(3), pages 525-551, June.
    14. Shangkun Deng & Chenguang Wang & Zhe Fu & Mingyue Wang, 2021. "An Intelligent System for Insider Trading Identification in Chinese Security Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 57(2), pages 593-616, February.
    15. X Nie & S Wager, 2021. "Quasi-oracle estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects [TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 108(2), pages 299-319.
    16. Piero Mazzarisi & Adele Ravagnani & Paola Deriu & Fabrizio Lillo & Francesca Medda & Antonio Russo, 2022. "A machine learning approach to support decision in insider trading detection," Papers 2212.05912, arXiv.org.
    17. Lauren Cohen & Andrea Frazzini & Christopher Malloy, 2008. "The Small World of Investing: Board Connections and Mutual Fund Returns," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5), pages 951-979, October.
    18. Fama, Eugene F. & French, Kenneth R., 1993. "Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1), pages 3-56, February.
    19. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881, Enero-Abr.
    20. George A. Akerlof, 1970. "The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 84(3), pages 488-500.
    21. Roth, Ae & Verrecchia, Re, 1979. "Shapley Value As Applied To Cost Allocation - Reinterpretation," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(1), pages 295-303.
    22. Goergen, Marc & Renneboog, Luc & Zhao, Yang, 2019. "Insider trading and networked directors," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 152-175.
    23. Kenneth R Ahern, 0. "Do Proxies for Informed Trading Measure Informed Trading? Evidence from Illegal Insider Trades," The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 10(3), pages 397-440.
    24. Benjamin Avanzi & Greg Taylor & Melantha Wang & Bernard Wong, 2023. "Machine Learning with High-Cardinality Categorical Features in Actuarial Applications," Papers 2301.12710, arXiv.org.
    25. Messod D. Beneish, 1999. "The Detection of Earnings Manipulation," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(5), pages 24-36, September.
    26. Nicolai Meinshausen, 2008. "Hierarchical testing of variable importance," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 95(2), pages 265-278.
    27. Pearl Judea, 2010. "An Introduction to Causal Inference," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-62, February.
    28. Ian D. Gow & David F. Larcker & Peter C. Reiss, 2016. "Causal Inference in Accounting Research," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 54(2), pages 477-523, May.
    29. Lakonishok, Josef & Lee, Inmoo, 2001. "Are Insider Trades Informative?," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(1), pages 79-111.
    30. Lauren Cohen & Christopher Malloy & Lukasz Pomorski, 2012. "Decoding Inside Information," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 67(3), pages 1009-1043, June.
    31. Leslie A. Jeng & Andrew Metrick & Richard Zeckhauser, 2003. "Estimating the Returns to Insider Trading: A Performance-Evaluation Perspective," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 85(2), pages 453-471, May.
    32. Kallunki, Juha-Pekka & Nilsson, Henrik & Hellström, Jörgen, 2009. "Why do insiders trade? Evidence based on unique data on Swedish insiders," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 37-53, October.
    33. Fishman, Michael J & Hagerty, Kathleen M, 1995. "The Mandatory Disclosure of Trades and Market Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 8(3), pages 637-676.
    34. Imbens, Guido W & Angrist, Joshua D, 1994. "Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 62(2), pages 467-475, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rahman, Dewan & Kabir, Muhammad & Oliver, Barry, 2021. "Does exposure to product market competition influence insider trading profitability?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Mansoor Afzali & Minna Martikainen, 2021. "Network centrality and value relevance of insider trading: Evidence from Europe," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 56(4), pages 793-819, November.
    3. Shen, Dongxiao & He, Guanming, 2025. "Restricting insider trading through increasing managerial risk aversion – A behavioral mechanism," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    4. Ding, Xiaoya (Sara) & Ni, Yang & Zhong, Ligang, 2016. "Free float and market liquidity around the world," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(PA), pages 236-257.
    5. Jiang, Chao & Wintoki, M. Babajide & Xi, Yaoyi, 2021. "Insider trading and the legal expertise of corporate executives," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    6. Pierce, Andrew T., 2024. "Capital-market effects of tipper-tippee insider trading law: Evidence from the Newman ruling," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    7. Kallunki, Jenni & Kallunki, Juha-Pekka & Nilsson, Henrik & Puhakka, Mikko, 2018. "Do an insider's wealth and income matter in the decision to engage in insider trading?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 135-165.
    8. Biggerstaff, Lee & Cicero, David & Wintoki, M. Babajide, 2020. "Insider trading patterns," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    9. Andres, Christian & Cumming, Douglas & Karabiber, Timur & Schweizer, Denis, 2014. "Do markets anticipate capital structure decisions? — Feedback effects in equity liquidity," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 133-156.
    10. Skaife, Hollis A. & Veenman, David & Wangerin, Daniel, 2013. "Internal control over financial reporting and managerial rent extraction: Evidence from the profitability of insider trading," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 91-110.
    11. Pham, Man Duy (Marty), 2022. "Management friendship and insider opportunism," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    12. Kyriacou, Kyriacos & Liu, Siming & Mase, Bryan, 2024. "Corruption and insider trading," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    13. Carlos Castro & Diego Agudelo & Sergio Preciado, 2017. "Measuring the effectiveness of volatility call auctions," Documentos de Trabajo 15498, Universidad del Rosario.
    14. Alan D. Jagolinzer & David F. Larcker & Gaizka Ormazabal & Daniel J. Taylor, 2020. "Political Connections and the Informativeness of Insider Trades," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 75(4), pages 1833-1876, August.
    15. Clacher, Iain & Garcia Osma, Beatriz & Scarlat, Elvira & Shields, Karin, 2021. "Do commonalities facilitate private information channels? Evidence from common gender and insider trading," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Lenkey, Stephen L., 2017. "Insider trading and the short-swing profit rule," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 517-545.
    17. Krishna Neupane & Igor Griva, 2025. "An extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) Trees approach to Detect and Identify Unlawful Insider Trading (UIT) Transactions," Papers 2511.08306, arXiv.org.
    18. Pham, Mia Hang, 2020. "In law we trust: Lawyer CEOs and stock liquidity," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    19. Eckbo, B. Espen & Ødegaard, Bernt Arne, 2025. "Director informativeness following board gender balancing: Evidence from insider trading," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    20. Bardong, Florian & Bartram, Söhnke M. & Yadav, Pradeep K., 2005. "Informed Trading, Information Asymmetry and Pricing of Information Risk: Empirical Evidence from the NYSE," MPRA Paper 13586, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 10 Oct 2008.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2602.19841. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.