IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2601.04160.html

All That Glisters Is Not Gold: A Benchmark for Reference-Free Counterfactual Financial Misinformation Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Yuechen Jiang
  • Zhiwei Liu
  • Yupeng Cao
  • Yueru He
  • Ziyang Xu
  • Chen Xu
  • Zhiyang Deng
  • Prayag Tiwari
  • Xi Chen
  • Alejandro Lopez-Lira
  • Jimin Huang
  • Junichi Tsujii
  • Sophia Ananiadou

Abstract

We introduce RFC Bench, a benchmark for evaluating large language models on financial misinformation under realistic news. RFC Bench operates at the paragraph level and captures the contextual complexity of financial news where meaning emerges from dispersed cues. The benchmark defines two complementary tasks: reference free misinformation detection and comparison based diagnosis using paired original perturbed inputs. Experiments reveal a consistent pattern: performance is substantially stronger when comparative context is available, while reference free settings expose significant weaknesses, including unstable predictions and elevated invalid outputs. These results indicate that current models struggle to maintain coherent belief states without external grounding. By highlighting this gap, RFC Bench provides a structured testbed for studying reference free reasoning and advancing more reliable financial misinformation detection in real world settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuechen Jiang & Zhiwei Liu & Yupeng Cao & Yueru He & Ziyang Xu & Chen Xu & Zhiyang Deng & Prayag Tiwari & Xi Chen & Alejandro Lopez-Lira & Jimin Huang & Junichi Tsujii & Sophia Ananiadou, 2026. "All That Glisters Is Not Gold: A Benchmark for Reference-Free Counterfactual Financial Misinformation Detection," Papers 2601.04160, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.04160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2601.04160
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2601.04160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.