IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.17117.html

Modified Delayed Acceptance MCMC for Quasi-Bayesian Inference with Linear Moment Conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Masahiro Tanaka

Abstract

We develop a computationally efficient framework for quasi-Bayesian inference based on linear moment conditions. The approach employs a delayed acceptance Markov chain Monte Carlo (DA-MCMC) algorithm that uses a surrogate target kernel and a proposal distribution derived from an approximate conditional posterior, thereby exploiting the structure of the quasi-likelihood. Two implementations are introduced. DA-MCMC-Exact fully incorporates prior information into the proposal distribution and maximizes per-iteration efficiency, whereas DA-MCMC-Approx omits the prior in the proposal to reduce matrix inversions, improving numerical stability and computational speed in higher dimensions. Simulation studies on heteroskedastic linear regressions show substantial gains over standard MCMC and conventional DA-MCMC baselines, measured by multivariate effective sample size per iteration and per second. The Approx variant yields the best overall throughput, while the Exact variant attains the highest per-iteration efficiency. Applications to two empirical instrumental variable regressions corroborate these findings: the Approx implementation scales to larger designs where other methods become impractical, while still delivering precise inference. Although developed for moment-based quasi-posteriors, the proposed approach also extends to risk-based quasi-Bayesian formulations when first-order conditions are linear and can be transformed analogously. Overall, the proposed algorithms provide a practical and robust tool for quasi-Bayesian analysis in statistical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Masahiro Tanaka, 2025. "Modified Delayed Acceptance MCMC for Quasi-Bayesian Inference with Linear Moment Conditions," Papers 2511.17117, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2026.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.17117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.17117
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chernozhukov, Victor & Hong, Han, 2003. "An MCMC approach to classical estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 293-346, August.
    2. P. G. Bissiri & C. C. Holmes & S. G. Walker, 2016. "A general framework for updating belief distributions," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1103-1130, November.
    3. Hall, Alastair R., 2004. "Generalized Method of Moments," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198775201.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Canova & Christian Matthes, 2021. "Dealing with misspecification in structural macroeconometric models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), pages 313-350, May.
    2. Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier & Christian P. Robert, 2020. "Computing Bayes: Bayesian Computation from 1763 to the 21st Century," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 14/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    3. Toru Kitagawa & Hugo Lopez & Jeff Rowley, 2022. "Stochastic Treatment Choice with Empirical Welfare Updating," Papers 2211.01537, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    4. Zhichao Liu & Catherine Forbes & Heather Anderson, 2017. "Robust Bayesian exponentially tilted empirical likelihood method," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 21/17, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    5. Ruben Loaiza‐Maya & Gael M. Martin & David T. Frazier, 2021. "Focused Bayesian prediction," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 517-543, August.
    6. David T. Frazier & Ruben Loaiza-Maya & Gael M. Martin, 2021. "Variational Bayes in State Space Models: Inferential and Predictive Accuracy," Papers 2106.12262, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    7. Fabio Canova & Christian Matthes, 2021. "A Composite Likelihood Approach for Dynamic Structural Models," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 131(638), pages 2447-2477.
    8. Rong Tang & Yun Yang, 2022. "Bayesian inference for risk minimization via exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1257-1286, September.
    9. Jack Jewson & David Rossell, 2022. "General Bayesian loss function selection and the use of improper models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(5), pages 1640-1665, November.
    10. Maria Laura Battagliola & Helle Sørensen & Anders Tolver & Ana-Maria Staicu, 2025. "Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Functional Data with Application to Feed Intake of Lactating Sows," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 30(1), pages 211-230, March.
    11. Mr. Alin T Mirestean & Mr. Charalambos G Tsangarides & Huigang Chen, 2009. "Limited Information Bayesian Model Averaging for Dynamic Panels with Short Time Periods," IMF Working Papers 2009/074, International Monetary Fund.
    12. Takuo Matsubara & Jeremias Knoblauch & François‐Xavier Briol & Chris J. Oates, 2022. "Robust generalised Bayesian inference for intractable likelihoods," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 84(3), pages 997-1022, July.
    13. David Kohns & Tibor Szendrei, 2025. "Joint Quantile Shrinkage: A State-Space Approach toward Non-Crossing Bayesian Quantile Models," Papers 2506.13257, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    14. Patrick Bajari & Jeremy Fox & Stephen Ryan, 2008. "Evaluating wireless carrier consolidation using semiparametric demand estimation," Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME), Springer, vol. 6(4), pages 299-338, December.
    15. Greg Kaplan, 2012. "Inequality and the life cycle," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 3(3), pages 471-525, November.
    16. Ioannis Bournakis & Mike Tsionas, 2024. "A Non‐parametric Estimation of Productivity with Idiosyncratic and Aggregate Shocks: The Role of Research and Development (R&D) and Corporate Tax," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(3), pages 641-671, June.
    17. Bonciani, Dario, 2014. "Uncertainty shocks: it's a matter of habit," MPRA Paper 59370, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Noriko Amano, 2018. "Nutrition Inequality: The Role of Prices, Income, and Preferences," 2018 Meeting Papers 453, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    19. Manuel Arellano & Stéphane Bonhomme, 2009. "Robust Priors in Nonlinear Panel Data Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 77(2), pages 489-536, March.
    20. Sebastian Heise & Justin R. Pierce & Georg Schaur & Peter K. Schott, 2024. "Tariff Rate Uncertainty and the Structure of Supply Chains," NBER Working Papers 32138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.17117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.