IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2511.04515.html

Robust mean-field control under common noise uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Mathieu Lauri`ere
  • Ariel Neufeld
  • Kyunghyun Park

Abstract

We propose and analyze a framework for discrete-time robust mean-field control problems under common noise uncertainty. In this framework, the mean-field interaction describes the collective behavior of infinitely many cooperative agents' state and action, while the common noise -- a random disturbance affecting all agents' state dynamics -- is uncertain. A social planner optimizes over open-loop controls on an infinite horizon to maximize the representative agent's worst-case expected reward, where worst-case corresponds to the most adverse probability measure among all candidates inducing the unknown true law of the common noise process. We refer to this optimization as a robust mean-field control problem under common noise uncertainty. We first show that this problem arises as the asymptotic limit of a cooperative $N$-agent robust optimization problem, commonly known as propagation of chaos. We then prove the existence of an optimal open-loop control by linking the robust mean field control problem to a lifted robust Markov decision problem on the space of probability measures and by establishing the dynamic programming principle and Bellman--Isaac fixed point theorem for the lifted robust Markov decision problem. Finally, we complement our theoretical results with numerical experiments motivated by distribution planning and systemic risk in finance, highlighting the advantages of accounting for common noise uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathieu Lauri`ere & Ariel Neufeld & Kyunghyun Park, 2025. "Robust mean-field control under common noise uncertainty," Papers 2511.04515, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.04515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2511.04515
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mao Fabrice Djete & Dylan Possamaï & Xiaolu Tan, 2022. "McKean–Vlasov Optimal Control: Limit Theory and Equivalence Between Different Formulations," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(4), pages 2891-2930, November.
    2. Ariel Neufeld & Julian Sester & Mario Šikić, 2023. "Markov decision processes under model uncertainty," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 618-665, July.
    3. Zengjing Chen & Larry Epstein, 2002. "Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1403-1443, July.
    4. Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal & Tan Wang, 2007. "Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 20(1), pages 41-81, January.
    5. Romuald Élie & Emma Hubert & Thibaut Mastrolia & Dylan Possamaï, 2021. "Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 399-473, January.
    6. Huan Xu & Shie Mannor, 2012. "Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 288-300, May.
    7. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    8. Nicole Bäuerle & Alexander Glauner, 2022. "Distributionally Robust Markov Decision Processes and Their Connection to Risk Measures," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(3), pages 1757-1780, August.
    9. Matteo Basei & Huyên Pham, 2019. "A Weak Martingale Approach to Linear-Quadratic McKean–Vlasov Stochastic Control Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 347-382, May.
    10. Mathieu Laurière & Olivier Pironneau, 2016. "Dynamic Programming for Mean-Field Type Control," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 902-924, June.
    11. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Berç Rustem, 2013. "Robust Markov Decision Processes," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(1), pages 153-183, February.
    12. Rene Carmona, 2020. "Applications of Mean Field Games in Financial Engineering and Economic Theory," Papers 2012.05237, arXiv.org.
    13. Chung I Lu & Julian Sester & Aijia Zhang, 2025. "Distributionally Robust Deep Q-Learning," Papers 2505.19058, arXiv.org.
    14. Haotian Gu & Xin Guo & Xiaoli Wei & Renyuan Xu, 2025. "Mean-Field Multiagent Reinforcement Learning: A Decentralized Network Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 506-536, February.
    15. Huyên Pham, 2016. "Linear quadratic optimal control of conditional McKean-Vlasov equation with random coefficients and applications ," Post-Print hal-01305929, HAL.
    16. Haotian Gu & Xin Guo & Xiaoli Wei & Renyuan Xu, 2023. "Dynamic Programming Principles for Mean-Field Controls with Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 1040-1054, July.
    17. Guanxing Fu & Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2024. "A Mean-Field Control Problem of Optimal Portfolio Liquidation with Semimartingale Strategies," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 2356-2384, November.
    18. Ariel Neufeld & Julian Sester & Mario v{S}iki'c, 2022. "Markov Decision Processes under Model Uncertainty," Papers 2206.06109, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chung I Lu & Julian Sester & Aijia Zhang, 2025. "Distributionally Robust Deep Q-Learning," Papers 2505.19058, arXiv.org.
    2. Jorn Sass & Dorothee Westphal, 2019. "Robust Utility Maximizing Strategies under Model Uncertainty and their Convergence," Papers 1909.01830, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.
    3. Maillet, Bertrand & Tokpavi, Sessi & Vaucher, Benoit, 2015. "Global minimum variance portfolio optimisation under some model risk: A robust regression-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 289-299.
    4. Sujoy Mukerji & Han N. Ozsoylev & Jean‐Marc Tallon, 2023. "Trading Ambiguity: A Tale Of Two Heterogeneities," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 64(3), pages 1127-1164, August.
    5. Maximilian Blesch & Philipp Eisenhauer, 2021. "Robust decision-making under risk and ambiguity," Papers 2104.12573, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2021.
    6. Hui Chen & Nengjiu Ju & Jianjun Miao, 2014. "Dynamic Asset Allocation with Ambiguous Return Predictability," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(4), pages 799-823, October.
    7. Dirk Becherer & Klebert Kentia, 2017. "Good Deal Hedging and Valuation under Combined Uncertainty about Drift and Volatility," Papers 1704.02505, arXiv.org.
    8. Ulrich, Maxim, 2013. "Inflation ambiguity and the term structure of U.S. Government bonds," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 295-309.
    9. Meyer, Steffen & Uhr, Charline, 2024. "Ambiguity and private investors’ behavior after forced fund liquidations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    10. Massimo Guidolin & Francesca Rinaldi, 2013. "Ambiguity in asset pricing and portfolio choice: a review of the literature," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 183-217, February.
    11. Wolfram Wiesemann & Daniel Kuhn & Melvyn Sim, 2014. "Distributionally Robust Convex Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1358-1376, December.
    12. Saghafian, Soroush, 2018. "Ambiguous partially observable Markov decision processes: Structural results and applications," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 1-35.
    13. Dirk Becherer & Klebert Kentia, 2017. "Hedging under generalized good-deal bounds and model uncertainty," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(1), pages 171-214, August.
    14. Mao, Jie & Shen, Guanxiong & Yan, Jingzhou, 2023. "A continuous-time macro-finance model with Knightian uncertainty," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Andrew J. Keith & Darryl K. Ahner, 2021. "A survey of decision making and optimization under uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(2), pages 319-353, May.
    16. Zhang, Jinqing & Jin, Zeyu & An, Yunbi, 2017. "Dynamic portfolio optimization with ambiguity aversion," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 95-109.
    17. André, Eric, 2014. "Optimal portfolio with vector expected utility," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 50-62.
    18. Nengjiu Ju & Jianjun Miao, 2012. "Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 559-591, March.
    19. Brenner, Menachem & Izhakian, Yehuda, 2018. "Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence⁎," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(3), pages 503-531.
    20. Phelim Boyle & Lorenzo Garlappi & Raman Uppal & Tan Wang, 2012. "Keynes Meets Markowitz: The Trade-Off Between Familiarity and Diversification," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(2), pages 253-272, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2511.04515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.