IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.14391.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Policy relevance of causal quantities in networks

Author

Listed:
  • Sahil Loomba
  • Dean Eckles

Abstract

In settings where units' outcomes are affected by others' treatments, there has been a proliferation of ways to quantify effects of treatments on outcomes. Here we describe how many proposed estimands can be represented as involving one of two ways of averaging over units and treatment assignments. The more common representation often results in quantities that are irrelevant, or at least insufficient, for optimal choice of policies governing treatment assignment. The other representation often yields quantities that lack an interpretation as summaries of unit-level effects, but that we argue may still be relevant to policy choice. Among various estimands, the expected average outcome -- or its contrast between two different policies -- can be represented both ways and, we argue, merits further attention.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahil Loomba & Dean Eckles, 2025. "Policy relevance of causal quantities in networks," Papers 2507.14391, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.14391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.14391
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eckles Dean & Karrer Brian & Ugander Johan, 2017. "Design and Analysis of Experiments in Networks: Reducing Bias from Interference," Journal of Causal Inference, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Charles F. Manski, 2013. "Identification of treatment response with social interactions," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Yuchen Hu & Shuangning Li & Stefan Wager, 2022. "Average direct and indirect causal effects under interference [Estimating average causal effects under general interference, with application to a social network experiment]," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 109(4), pages 1165-1172.
    4. Davide Viviano, 2025. "Policy Targeting under Network Interference," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 92(2), pages 1257-1292.
    5. Charles F. Manski, 2004. "Statistical Treatment Rules for Heterogeneous Populations," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 1221-1246, July.
    6. VanderWeele, Tyler J. & Tchetgen Tchetgen, Eric J., 2011. "Effect partitioning under interference in two-stage randomized vaccine trials," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(7), pages 861-869, July.
    7. Jing Cai & Alain De Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2015. "Social Networks and the Decision to Insure," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 81-108, April.
    8. Michael P Leung, 2024. "Discussion of ‘Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions’," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(1), pages 17-20.
    9. Laura Forastiere & Edoardo M. Airoldi & Fabrizia Mealli, 2021. "Identification and Estimation of Treatment and Interference Effects in Observational Studies on Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 116(534), pages 901-918, April.
    10. Eric Auerbach & Jonathan Auerbach & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "Discussion of ‘Causal inference with misspecified exposure mappings: separating definitions and assumptions’," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 111(1), pages 21-24.
    11. Hudgens, Michael G. & Halloran, M. Elizabeth, 2008. "Toward Causal Inference With Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 832-842, June.
    12. Yuchen Hu & Shuangning Li & Stefan Wager, 2021. "Average Direct and Indirect Causal Effects under Interference," Papers 2104.03802, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    13. Alex Chin & Dean Eckles & Johan Ugander, 2022. "Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1714-1736, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuehao Bai & Azeem M. Shaikh & Max Tabord-Meehan, 2024. "A Primer on the Analysis of Randomized Experiments and a Survey of some Recent Advances," Papers 2405.03910, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    2. Haoge Chang, 2023. "Design-based Estimation Theory for Complex Experiments," Papers 2311.06891, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    3. Davide Viviano & Jess Rudder, 2020. "Policy design in experiments with unknown interference," Papers 2011.08174, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    4. Christopher Harshaw & Fredrik Savje & Yitan Wang, 2022. "A General Design-Based Framework and Estimator for Randomized Experiments," Papers 2210.08698, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2025.
    5. Jinglong Zhao, 2024. "Experimental Design For Causal Inference Through An Optimization Lens," Papers 2408.09607, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2024.
    6. Luo, Shikai & Yang, Ying & Shi, Chengchun & Yao, Fang & Ye, Jieping & Zhu, Hongtu, 2024. "Policy evaluation for temporal and/or spatial dependent experiments," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 122741, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    7. Tadao Hoshino & Takahide Yanagi, 2024. "Causal Inference with Noncompliance and Unknown Interference," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(548), pages 2869-2880, October.
    8. Anish Agarwal & Sarah H. Cen & Devavrat Shah & Christina Lee Yu, 2022. "Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interference," Papers 2210.11355, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2023.
    9. Davide Viviano, 2020. "Experimental Design under Network Interference," Papers 2003.08421, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2022.
    10. Yi Zhang & Kosuke Imai, 2023. "Individualized Policy Evaluation and Learning under Clustered Network Interference," Papers 2311.02467, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    11. Supriya Tiwari & Pallavi Basu, 2024. "Quasi-randomization tests for network interference," Papers 2403.16673, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    12. Luofeng Liao & Christian Kroer, 2024. "Statistical Inference and A/B Testing in Fisher Markets and Paced Auctions," Papers 2406.15522, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    13. Hao, Shiming, 2021. "True structure change, spurious treatment effect? A novel approach to disentangle treatment effects from structure changes," MPRA Paper 108679, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Nicolas Debarsy & Julie Le Gallo, 2024. "Identification of spatial spillovers: Do’s and don'ts," Working Papers hal-04549691, HAL.
    15. Denis Fougère & Nicolas Jacquemet, 2020. "Policy Evaluation Using Causal Inference Methods," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03455978, HAL.
    16. Debopam Bhattacharya & Pascaline Dupas & Shin Kanaya, 2013. "Estimating the Impact of Means-tested Subsidies under Treatment Externalities with Application to Anti-Malarial Bednets," CREATES Research Papers 2013-06, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    17. Eric Auerbach & Yong Cai & Ahnaf Rafi, 2024. "Regression Discontinuity Design with Spillovers," Papers 2404.06471, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    18. Cyrus Samii & Ye Wang & Jonathan Sullivan & P. M. Aronow, 2023. "Inference in Spatial Experiments with Interference using the SpatialEffect Package," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 28(1), pages 138-156, March.
    19. Zhaonan Qu & Ruoxuan Xiong & Jizhou Liu & Guido Imbens, 2021. "Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effects in Observational Studies with Heterogeneous Partial Interference," Papers 2107.12420, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
    20. Alex Chin & Dean Eckles & Johan Ugander, 2022. "Evaluating Stochastic Seeding Strategies in Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 1714-1736, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.14391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.