IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2401.02378.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Opinion formation in the world trade network

Author

Listed:
  • C'elestin Coquid'e
  • Jos'e Lages
  • Dima L. Shepelyansky

Abstract

We extend the opinion formation approach to probe the world influence of economical organizations. Our opinion formation model mimics a battle between currencies within the international trade network. Based on the United Nations Comtrade database, we construct the world trade network for the years of the last decade from 2010 to 2020. We consider different core groups constituted by countries preferring to trade in a specific currency. We will consider principally two core groups, namely, 5 Anglo-Saxon countries which prefer to trade in US dollar and the 11 BRICS+ which prefer to trade in a hypothetical currency, hereafter called BRI, pegged to their economies. We determine the trade currency preference of the other countries via a Monte Carlo process depending on the direct transactions between the countries. The results obtained in the frame of this mathematical model show that starting from year 2014 the majority of the world countries would have preferred to trade in BRI than USD. The Monte Carlo process reaches a steady state with 3 distinct groups: two groups of countries preferring, whatever is the initial distribution of the trade currency preferences, to trade, one in BRI and the other in USD, and a third group of countries swinging as a whole between USD and BRI depending on the initial distribution of the trade currency preferences. We also analyze the battle between USD, EUR and BRI, and present the reduced Google matrix description of the trade relations between the Anglo-Saxon countries and the BRICS+.

Suggested Citation

  • C'elestin Coquid'e & Jos'e Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2024. "Opinion formation in the world trade network," Papers 2401.02378, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.02378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2401.02378
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Józef Sznajd, 2000. "Opinion Evolution In Closed Community," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(06), pages 1157-1165.
    2. Serge Galam, 2008. "Sociophysics: A Review Of Galam Models," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(03), pages 409-440.
    3. Luca De Benedictis & Lucia Tajoli, 2011. "The World Trade Network," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(8), pages 1417-1454, August.
    4. Leonardo Ermann & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2011. "Google matrix of the world trade network," Papers 1103.5027, arXiv.org.
    5. C'elestin Coquid'e & Jos'e Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2022. "Dollar-Yuan Battle in the World Trade Network," Papers 2211.07180, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    6. Klaus M. Frahm & Katia Jaffrès-Runser & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2016. "Wikipedia mining of hidden links between political leaders," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 89(12), pages 1-21, December.
    7. C'elestin Coquid'e & Leonardo Ermann & Jos'e Lages & D. L. Shepelyansky, 2019. "Influence of petroleum and gas trade on EU economies from the reduced Google matrix analysis of UN COMTRADE data," Papers 1903.01820, arXiv.org.
    8. Leonardo Ermann & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2015. "Google matrix analysis of the multiproduct world trade network," Papers 1501.03371, arXiv.org.
    9. Célestin Coquidé & Leonardo Ermann & José Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2019. "Influence of petroleum and gas trade on EU economies from the reduced Google matrix analysis of UN COMTRADE data," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 92(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. C'elestin Coquid'e & Jos'e Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2023. "Prospects of BRICS currency dominance in international trade," Papers 2305.00585, arXiv.org.
    11. Leonardo Ermann & Dima Shepelyansky, 2015. "Google matrix analysis of the multiproduct world trade network," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 88(4), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Duncan J. Watts & Peter Sheridan Dodds, 2007. "Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 34(4), pages 441-458, May.
    13. A. O. Zhirov & O. V. Zhirov & D. L. Shepelyansky, 2010. "Two-dimensional ranking of Wikipedia articles," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 77(4), pages 523-531, October.
    14. Kandiah, Vivek & Shepelyansky, Dima L., 2012. "PageRank model of opinion formation on social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5779-5793.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Dima Shepelyansky, 2024. "Opinion Formation in the World Trade Network," Post-Print hal-04461784, HAL.
    2. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Leonardo Ermann & Dima Shepelyansky, 2022. "COVID-19 impact on the international trade," Post-Print hal-03536528, HAL.
    3. Célestin Coquidé & José Lages & Dima Shepelyansky, 2020. "Interdependence of sectors of economic activities for world countries from the reduced Google matrix analysis of WTO data," Post-Print hal-02132487, HAL.
    4. C'elestin Coquid'e & Jos'e Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2023. "Prospects of BRICS currency dominance in international trade," Papers 2305.00585, arXiv.org.
    5. C'elestin Coquid'e & Jos'e Lages & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2020. "Crisis contagion in the world trade network," Papers 2002.07100, arXiv.org.
    6. Vivek Kandiah & Hubert Escaith & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2015. "Google matrix of the world network of economic activities," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 88(7), pages 1-20, July.
    7. V. Kandiah & H. Escaith & D. L. Shepelyansky, 2015. "Contagion effects in the world network of economic activities," Papers 1507.03278, arXiv.org.
    8. Demidov, Denis & Frahm, Klaus M. & Shepelyansky, Dima L., 2020. "What is the central bank of Wikipedia?," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    9. C'elestin Coquid'e & Leonardo Ermann & Jos'e Lages & D. L. Shepelyansky, 2019. "Influence of petroleum and gas trade on EU economies from the reduced Google matrix analysis of UN COMTRADE data," Papers 1903.01820, arXiv.org.
    10. Denis Demidov & Klaus M. Frahm & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2019. "What is the central bank of Wikipedia?," Papers 1902.07920, arXiv.org.
    11. Bartłomiej Nowak & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron, 2019. "Homogeneous Symmetrical Threshold Model with Nonconformity: Independence versus Anticonformity," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-14, April.
    12. Matjaž Steinbacher & Mitja Steinbacher, 2019. "Opinion Formation with Imperfect Agents as an Evolutionary Process," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(2), pages 479-505, February.
    13. Leonardo Ermann & Dima L. Shepelyansky, 2015. "Google matrix analysis of the multiproduct world trade network," Papers 1501.03371, arXiv.org.
    14. Lee, Eun & Holme, Petter & Lee, Sang Hoon, 2017. "Modeling the dynamics of dissent," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 486(C), pages 262-272.
    15. Ding, Fei & Liu, Yun & Shen, Bo & Si, Xia-Meng, 2010. "An evolutionary game theory model of binary opinion formation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(8), pages 1745-1752.
    16. Guillaume Rollin & José Lages & Dima L Shepelyansky, 2019. "Wikipedia network analysis of cancer interactions and world influence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-26, September.
    17. Francisco J. León-Medina & Jordi Tena-Sánchez & Francisco J. Miguel, 2020. "Fakers becoming believers: how opinion dynamics are shaped by preference falsification, impression management and coherence heuristics," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 385-412, April.
    18. Frahm, Klaus M. & Shepelyansky, Dima L., 2020. "Google matrix analysis of bi-functional SIGNOR network of protein–protein interactions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 559(C).
    19. Young-Ho Eom & Dima L Shepelyansky, 2013. "Highlighting Entanglement of Cultures via Ranking of Multilingual Wikipedia Articles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    20. María Cecilia Gimenez & Luis Reinaudi & Ana Pamela Paz-García & Paulo Marcelo Centres & Antonio José Ramirez-Pastor, 2021. "Opinion evolution in the presence of constant propaganda: homogeneous and localized cases," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 94(1), pages 1-11, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2401.02378. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.