IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2311.06476.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relative entropy-regularized robust optimal order execution

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Wang
  • Tai-Ho Wang

Abstract

The problem of order execution is cast as a relative entropy-regularized robust optimal control problem in this article. The order execution agent's goal is to maximize an objective functional associated with his profit-and-loss of trading and simultaneously minimize the execution risk and the market's liquidity and uncertainty. We model the market's liquidity and uncertainty by the principle of least relative entropy associated with the market volume. The problem of order execution is made into a relative entropy-regularized stochastic differential game. Standard argument of dynamic programming yields that the value function of the differential game satisfies a relative entropy-regularized Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs (rHJI) equation. Under the assumptions of linear-quadratic model with Gaussian prior, the rHJI equation reduces to a system of Riccati and linear differential equations. Further imposing constancy of the corresponding coefficients, the system of differential equations can be solved in closed form, resulting in analytical expressions for optimal strategy and trajectory as well as the posterior distribution of market volume. Numerical examples illustrating the optimal strategies and the comparisons with conventional trading strategies are conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Wang & Tai-Ho Wang, 2023. "Relative entropy-regularized robust optimal order execution," Papers 2311.06476, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.06476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2311.06476
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue Cheng & Marina Di Giacinto & Tai-Ho Wang, 2017. "Optimal execution with uncertain order fills in Almgren–Chriss framework," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 55-69, January.
    2. Francesca Mariani & Lorella Fatone, 2022. "Optimal solution of the liquidation problem under execution and price impact risks," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(6), pages 1037-1049, June.
    3. Xue Cheng & Marina Di Giacinto & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Optimal execution with dynamic risk adjustment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(10), pages 1662-1677, October.
    4. Kyle, Albert S, 1985. "Continuous Auctions and Insider Trading," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 53(6), pages 1315-1335, November.
    5. Xue Cheng & Marina Di Giacinto & Tai-Ho Wang, 2019. "Optimal execution with dynamic risk adjustment," Papers 1901.00617, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    6. René Carmona & Kevin Webster, 2019. "The self-financing equation in limit order book markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 729-759, July.
    7. Marina Di Giacinto & Claudio Tebaldi & Tai-Ho Wang, 2021. "Optimal order execution under price impact: A hybrid model," Papers 2112.02228, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marina Di Giacinto & Claudio Tebaldi & Tai-Ho Wang, 2021. "Optimal order execution under price impact: A hybrid model," Papers 2112.02228, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    2. Marina Giacinto & Claudio Tebaldi & Tai-Ho Wang, 2024. "Optimal order execution under price impact: a hybrid model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 605-636, May.
    3. Yang, Qing-Qing & Ching, Wai-Ki & Gu, Jia-wen & Wong, Tak Kwong & Zhu, Dong-Mei, 2024. "Viscosity solution for optimal liquidation problems with randomly-terminated horizon," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Qixuan Luo & Shijia Song & Handong Li, 2023. "Research on the Effects of Liquidation Strategies in the Multi-asset Artificial Market," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1721-1750, December.
    5. Christiane Goodfellow & Dirk Schiereck & Steffen Wippler, 2013. "Are behavioural finance equity funds a superior investment? A note on fund performance and market efficiency," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 14(2), pages 111-119, April.
    6. Berentsen, Aleksander & Huber, Samuel & Marchesiani, Alessandro, 2016. "The societal benefit of a financial transaction tax," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 303-323.
    7. Chang, Sanders S. & Wang, F. Albert, 2015. "Adverse selection and the presence of informed trading," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 19-33.
    8. Gur Huberman & Dominika Halka, 2001. "Systematic Liquidity," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 161-178, June.
    9. Liu, Hong & Qi, Lina & Li, Zaili, 2019. "Insider trading, representativeness heuristic insider, and market regulation," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 48-64.
    10. Rasmus Fatum & Jesper Pedersen & Peter Norman Sørensen, 2010. "Are the Intraday Effects of Central Bank Intervention on Exchange Rate Spreads Asymmetric and State Dependent?," Discussion Papers 10-20, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    11. Guillermo Llorente & Jiang Wang, 2020. "Trading and information in futures markets," Journal of Futures Markets, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 40(8), pages 1231-1263, August.
    12. Jhinyoung Shin & Rajdeep Singh, 2010. "Corporate Disclosures: Strategic Donation of Information," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 10(3), pages 313-337, September.
    13. Chakrabarty, Bidisha & Cox, Justin & Upson, James E., 2022. "Tick Size Pilot Program and price discovery in U.S. stock markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB).
    14. Goldstein, Itay & Yang, Liyan, 2019. "Good disclosure, bad disclosure," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 118-138.
    15. Anil Arya & Ram N. V. Ramanan, 2023. "Endogenizing Discretion in Disclosures," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3730-3747, June.
    16. Turan G. Bali & Robert F. Engle & Yi Tang, 2017. "Dynamic Conditional Beta Is Alive and Well in the Cross Section of Daily Stock Returns," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3760-3779, November.
    17. Mizrach, Bruce & Otsubo, Yoichi, 2014. "The market microstructure of the European climate exchange," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 107-116.
    18. Panayi, Efstathios & Peters, Gareth W. & Danielsson, Jon & Zigrand, Jean-Pierre, 2018. "Designating market maker behaviour in limit order book markets," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 20-44.
    19. Prakash Chakraborty & Kiseop Lee, 2022. "Bond Prices Under Information Asymmetry and a Short Rate with Instantaneous Feedback," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 613-634, June.
    20. Doureige J. Jurdi, 2020. "Intraday Jumps, Liquidity, and U.S. Macroeconomic News: Evidence from Exchange Traded Funds," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2311.06476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.