IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2305.01201.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating Input Coefficients for Regional Input-Output Tables Using Deep Learning with Mixup

Author

Listed:
  • Shogo Fukui

Abstract

An input-output table is an important data for analyzing the economic situation of a region. Generally, the input-output table for each region (regional input-output table) in Japan is not always publicly available, so it is necessary to estimate the table. In particular, various methods have been developed for estimating input coefficients, which are an important part of the input-output table. Currently, non-survey methods are often used to estimate input coefficients because they require less data and computation, but these methods have some problems, such as discarding information and requiring additional data for estimation. In this study, the input coefficients are estimated by approximating the generation process with an artificial neural network (ANN) to mitigate the problems of the non-survey methods and to estimate the input coefficients with higher precision. To avoid over-fitting due to the small data used, data augmentation, called mixup, is introduced to increase the data size by generating virtual regions through region composition and scaling. By comparing the estimates of the input coefficients with those of Japan as a whole, it is shown that the accuracy of the method of this research is higher and more stable than that of the conventional non-survey methods. In addition, the estimated input coefficients for the three cities in Japan are generally close to the published values for each city.

Suggested Citation

  • Shogo Fukui, 2023. "Estimating Input Coefficients for Regional Input-Output Tables Using Deep Learning with Mixup," Papers 2305.01201, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2024.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2305.01201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2305.01201
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Takashi Fujimoto, 2019. "Appropriate assumption on cross-hauling national input–output table regionalization," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(1), pages 106-128, January.
    2. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "Estimating regional input coefficients and multipliers: The Use of the FLQ is not a Gamble," Working Papers 20131302, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    3. Andrea Bonfiglio & Francesco Chelli, 2008. "Assessing the Behaviour of Non-Survey Methods for Constructing Regional Input-Output Tables through a Monte Carlo Simulation," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 243-258.
    4. Anthony T. Flegg & Guiseppe R. Lamonica & Francesco M. Chelli & Maria C. Recchioni & Timo Tohmo, 2021. "A new approach to modelling the input–output structure of regional economies using non-survey methods," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 10(1), pages 1-31, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cristian Mardones & Darling Silva, 2023. "Evaluation of Non-survey Methods for the Construction of Regional Input–Output Matrices When There is Partial Historical Information," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 1173-1205, March.
    2. Standardi, Gabriele & Turdyeva, Natalia, 2019. "Testing a methodology to split a national SAM and compute intra-national trade flows: an application for the Russian regions," Conference papers 333050, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Hana Kwon & Sung-Goan Choi, 2024. "An alternative approach to estimating regional input–output tables: the KFLQ method," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 72(2), pages 561-578, February.
    4. Marek Radvanský & Ivan Lichner, 2021. "An alternative approach to the construction of multi-regional input–output tables of the Czech Republic: application of the CHARM method," Empirica, Springer;Austrian Institute for Economic Research;Austrian Economic Association, vol. 48(4), pages 1083-1111, November.
    5. Gerd Ahlert, 2014. "Neuere Anwendungsfelder der Input-Output-Analyse – Tagungsband – Beiträge zum Input-Output-Workshop 2014 in Osnabrück," GWS Research Report Series 14-2, GWS - Institute of Economic Structures Research.
    6. Chapa Cantú Joana Cecilia & Mosqueda Chávez Marco Tulio & Rangel González Erick, 2019. "Social Accounting Matrices for the Regiones of Mexico," Working Papers 2019-20, Banco de México.
    7. Xuemei Jiang & Erik Dietzenbacher & Bart Los, 2010. "Targeting the Collection of Superior Data for the Estimation of the Intermediate Deliveries in Regional Input–Output Tables," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(10), pages 2508-2526, October.
    8. Lampiris, Georgios & Karelakis, Christos & Loizou, Efstratios, 2018. "Evaluation of the impacts of CAP policy measures on a local economy: The case of a Greek region," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 745-751.
    9. Tobias Kronenberg, 2012. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts (ESA)," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(2), pages 175-191, September.
    10. Chiquiar Daniel & Alvarado Jorge & Quiroga Miroslava & Torre Cepeda Leonardo E., 2017. "Regional Input-Output Matrices, an Application to Manufacturing Exports in Mexico," Working Papers 2017-09, Banco de México.
    11. Matthew S. Lyons, 2023. "The economic impact of COVID-19 on the creative industries: a sub-regional input–output approach," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Giuseppe Francesco Gori & Renato Paniccià, 2015. "A structural multisectoral model with new economic geography linkages for Tuscany," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94, pages 175-196, November.
    13. Kronenberg, Tobias, 2011. "Regional input-output models and the treatment of imports in the European System of Accounts," MPRA Paper 30797, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Andrea BONFIGLIO, 2008. "Evaluating Implications of Agricultural Policies in a Rural Region through a CGE Analysis," Working Papers 328, Universita' Politecnica delle Marche (I), Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Sociali.
    15. Hosoe, Nobuhiro, 2014. "Estimation errors in input–output tables and prediction errors in computable general equilibrium analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 277-286.
    16. Kowalewski Julia, 2013. "Inter-industrial Relations and Sectoral Employment Development in German Regions," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 233(4), pages 486-504, August.
    17. Szabó, Norbert & Bilicz, Hanga Lilla, 2024. "Lokális ágazatközi kapcsolatok - hibrid ÁKM Pécs városrégióban [Local intersectoral linkages: hybrid input-output tables in the Pécs City Region]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(6), pages 624-652.
    18. Anthony T. Flegg & Timo Tohmo, 2013. "A Comment on Tobias Kronenberg’s “Construction of Regional Input-Output Tables Using Nonsurvey Methods: The Role of Cross-Haulingâ€," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 36(2), pages 235-257, April.
    19. Kronenberg, Tobias & Többen, Johannes, 2011. "Regional input-output modelling in Germany: The case of North Rhine-Westphalia," MPRA Paper 35494, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Timo Tohmo, 2025. "The KFLQ revisited: estimating regional input–output tables for regions in South Korea," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 74(1), pages 1-24, March.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2305.01201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.