IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2302.09009.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Invoice discounting using kelly criterion by automated market makers-like implementations

Author

Listed:
  • Peplluis R. Esteva
  • Alberto Ballesteros Rodr'iguez

Abstract

There is a persistent lack of funding, especially for SMEs, that cyclically worsens. The factoring and invoice discounting market appears to address delays in paying commercial invoices: sellers bring still-to-be-paid invoices to financial organizations, intermediaries, typically banks that provide an advance payment. This article contains research on novel decentralized approaches to said lending services without intermediaries by using liquidity pools and its associated heuristics, creating an Automated Market Maker. In our approach, the contributed collateral and the invoice trades with risk is measured with a formula: The Kelly criterion is used to calculate the optimal premium to be contributed to a liquidity pool in the funding of the said invoices. The behavior of the algorithm is studied in several scenarios of streams of invoices with representative amounts, collaterals, payment delays, and nonpayments rates or mora. We completed the study with hack scenarios with bogus, nonpayable invoices. As a result, we have created a resilient solution that performs the best with partially collateralized invoices. The outcome is decentralized market developed with the Kelly criterion that is reasonably resilient to a wide variety of the invoicing cases that provides sound profit to liquidity providers, and several premium distribution policies were checked that contributed with extra resilience to the performance of the algorithm.

Suggested Citation

  • Peplluis R. Esteva & Alberto Ballesteros Rodr'iguez, 2023. "Invoice discounting using kelly criterion by automated market makers-like implementations," Papers 2302.09009, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.09009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.09009
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guillermo Angeris & Tarun Chitra, 2020. "Improved Price Oracles: Constant Function Market Makers," Papers 2003.10001, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2020.
    2. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance," Papers 2210.01227, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    3. Teng Andrea Xu & Jiahua Xu, 2022. "A Short Survey on Business Models of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Protocols," Papers 2202.07742, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    4. Gert Wehinger, 2014. "SMEs and the credit crunch: Current financing difficulties, policy measures and a review of literature," OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, OECD Publishing, vol. 2013(2), pages 115-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peplluis R. Esteva & Andrés El-Fakdi & Alberto Ballesteros-Rodríguez, 2023. "Invoice Discounting Using Kelly Criterion by Automated Market Makers-like Implementations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-37, March.
    2. Raphael Auer & Bernhard Haslhofer & Stefan Kitzler & Pietro Saggese & Friedhelm Victor, 2024. "The technology of decentralized finance (DeFi)," Digital Finance, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 55-95, March.
    3. Hamed Amini & Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2023. "Decentralized Prediction Markets and Sports Books," Papers 2307.08768, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    4. Petr Korab & Jitka Pomenkova, 2017. "Credit Rationing in Greece During and After the Financial Crisis," Czech Journal of Economics and Finance (Finance a uver), Charles University Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences, vol. 67(2), pages 119-139, April.
    5. Georg Menz & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Aggregation of financial markets," Papers 2309.04116, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2024.
    6. Maxim Bichuch & Zachary Feinstein, 2022. "Axioms for Automated Market Makers: A Mathematical Framework in FinTech and Decentralized Finance," Papers 2210.01227, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    7. Dev Churiwala & Bhaskar Krishnamachari, 2022. "QLAMMP: A Q-Learning Agent for Optimizing Fees on Automated Market Making Protocols," Papers 2211.14977, arXiv.org.
    8. Desogus, Marco & Casu, Elisa, 2020. "What Are the Impacts of Credit Crunch on the Bank-Enterprise System? An Analysis Through Dynamic Modeling and an Italian Dataset," MPRA Paper 114349, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Martinez Cillero, Maria & Lawless, Martina & O'Toole, Conor, 2019. "The determinants of SME capital structure across the lifecycle," Papers WP614, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    10. Stefano Filomeni & Michele Modina & Elena Tabacco, 2023. "Trade credit and firm investments: empirical evidence from Italian cooperative banks," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1099-1141, April.
    11. Guillermo Angeris & Alex Evans & Tarun Chitra, 2021. "Replicating Monotonic Payoffs Without Oracles," Papers 2111.13740, arXiv.org.
    12. Lisana B. Martinez & M. Belén Guercio & Aurelio F. Bariviera, 2022. "A meta‐analysis of SMEs literature based on the survey on access to finance of enterprises of the European central bank," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 1870-1885, April.
    13. Bremus, Franziska & Neugebauer, Katja, 2017. "Don't stop me now: the impact of credit market fragmentation on firms' financing constraints," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 70774, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Anne Kathrin Funk, 2019. "Quantitative easing in the euro area and SMEs' access to finance: Who benefits the most?," IHEID Working Papers 02-2019, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
    15. Philippe Bergault & Louis Bertucci & David Bouba & Olivier Gu'eant, 2022. "Automated Market Makers: Mean-Variance Analysis of LPs Payoffs and Design of Pricing Functions," Papers 2212.00336, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    16. Tristan Lim, 2022. "Predictive Crypto-Asset Automated Market Making Architecture for Decentralized Finance using Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2211.01346, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2023.
    17. Marco Desogus & Beatrice Venturi, 2023. "Stability and Bifurcations in Banks and Small Enterprises—A Three-Dimensional Continuous-Time Dynamical System," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Daniel Kirste & Niclas Kannengie{ss}er & Ricky Lamberty & Ali Sunyaev, 2023. "Automated Market Makers in Cryptoeconomic Systems: A Taxonomy and Archetypes," Papers 2309.12818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    19. Niccol`o Bardoscia & Alessandro Nodari, 2023. "Liquidity Providers Greeks and Impermanent Gain," Papers 2302.11942, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    20. Michael Darlin & Nikolaos Papadis & Leandros Tassiulas, 2020. "Optimal Bidding Strategy for Maker Auctions," Papers 2009.07086, arXiv.org, revised May 2021.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2302.09009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.