IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2203.10571.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Distributionally robust risk evaluation with a causality constraint and structural information

Author

Listed:
  • Bingyan Han

Abstract

This work studies distributionally robust evaluation of expected function values over temporal data. A set of alternative measures is characterized by the causal optimal transport. We prove the strong duality and recast the causality constraint as minimization over an infinite-dimensional test function space. We approximate test functions by neural networks and prove the sample complexity with Rademacher complexity. Moreover, when structural information is available to further restrict the ambiguity set, we prove the dual formulation and provide efficient optimization methods. Empirical analysis of realized volatility and stock indices demonstrates that our framework offers an attractive alternative to the classic optimal transport formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Bingyan Han, 2022. "Distributionally robust risk evaluation with a causality constraint and structural information," Papers 2203.10571, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.10571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2203.10571
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raman Uppal & Tan Wang, 2003. "Model Misspecification and Underdiversification," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 58(6), pages 2465-2486, December.
    2. Aharon Ben-Tal & Dimitris Bertsimas & David B. Brown, 2010. "A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-2), pages 1220-1234, August.
    3. Alfred Galichon, 2016. "Optimal Transport Methods in Economics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10870.
    4. Lars Peter Hansen & Thomas J Sargent, 2014. "Robust Control and Model Uncertainty," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: UNCERTAINTY WITHIN ECONOMIC MODELS, chapter 5, pages 145-154, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Hansen, Lars Peter, 2013. "Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2013-7, Nobel Prize Committee.
    6. Pascal J. Maenhout, 2004. "Robust Portfolio Rules and Asset Pricing," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 17(4), pages 951-983.
    7. Stephan Eckstein & Michael Kupper & Mathias Pohl, 2018. "Robust risk aggregation with neural networks," Papers 1811.00304, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    8. Damir Filipovic & Damien Ackerer & Sergio Pulido, 2018. "The Jacobi Stochastic Volatility Model," Post-Print hal-01338330, HAL.
    9. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglböck & Manu Eder, 2020. "Adapted Wasserstein distances and stability in mathematical finance," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 601-632, July.
    10. Amine Ismail & Huyên Pham, 2019. "Robust Markowitz mean‐variance portfolio selection under ambiguous covariance matrix," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 174-207, January.
    11. Alfred Galichon, 2016. "Optimal transport methods in economics," Post-Print hal-03256830, HAL.
    12. Stephan Eckstein & Michael Kupper & Mathias Pohl, 2020. "Robust risk aggregation with neural networks," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1229-1272, October.
    13. Daniel Bartl & Samuel Drapeau & Ludovic Tangpi, 2020. "Computational aspects of robust optimized certainty equivalents and option pricing," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 287-309, January.
    14. Damien Ackerer & Damir Filipović & Sergio Pulido, 2018. "The Jacobi stochastic volatility model," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 667-700, July.
    15. Gaoyue Guo & Jan Obloj, 2017. "Computational Methods for Martingale Optimal Transport problems," Papers 1710.07911, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2019.
    16. Georg Pflug & David Wozabal, 2007. "Ambiguity in portfolio selection," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(4), pages 435-442.
    17. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Daniel Bartl & Mathias Beiglbock & Manu Eder, 2019. "Adapted Wasserstein Distances and Stability in Mathematical Finance," Papers 1901.07450, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    18. Acciaio, B. & Backhoff-Veraguas, J. & Zalashko, A., 2020. "Causal optimal transport and its links to enlargement of filtrations and continuous-time stochastic optimization," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101864, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Damien Ackerer & Damir Filipovi'c & Sergio Pulido, 2016. "The Jacobi Stochastic Volatility Model," Papers 1605.07099, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2018.
    20. Lars Peter Hansen, 2014. "Nobel Lecture: Uncertainty Outside and Inside Economic Models," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 122(5), pages 945-987.
    21. Jose Blanchet & Karthyek Murthy, 2019. "Quantifying Distributional Model Risk via Optimal Transport," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(2), pages 565-600, May.
    22. Acciaio, B. & Backhoff-Veraguas, J. & Zalashko, A., 2020. "Causal optimal transport and its links to enlargement of filtrations and continuous-time stochastic optimization," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(5), pages 2918-2953.
    23. Bingyan Han & Chi Seng Pun & Hoi Ying Wong, 2021. "Robust state-dependent mean–variance portfolio selection: a closed-loop approach," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 529-561, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael Kupper & Max Nendel & Alessandro Sgarabottolo, 2023. "Risk measures based on weak optimal transport," Papers 2312.05973, arXiv.org.
    2. Loïc Berger & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2020. "Risk, Ambiguity, And The Value Of Diversification," Working Papers hal-02910906, HAL.
    3. Loïc Berger & Louis Eeckhoudt, 2021. "Risk, Ambiguity, and the Value of Diversification," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 1639-1647, March.
    4. Park, Kyunghyun & Wong, Hoi Ying & Yan, Tingjin, 2023. "Robust retirement and life insurance with inflation risk and model ambiguity," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 1-30.
    5. Ariel Neufeld & Matthew Ng Cheng En & Ying Zhang, 2024. "Robust SGLD algorithm for solving non-convex distributionally robust optimisation problems," Papers 2403.09532, arXiv.org.
    6. Max Nendel & Alessandro Sgarabottolo, 2022. "A parametric approach to the estimation of convex risk functionals based on Wasserstein distance," Papers 2210.14340, arXiv.org.
    7. Julio Backhoff-Veraguas & Xin Zhang, 2023. "Dynamic Cournot-Nash equilibrium: the non-potential case," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 1, June.
    8. Trojani, Fabio & Wiehenkamp, Christian & Wrampelmeyer, Jan, 2014. "Ambiguity and Reality," Working Papers on Finance 1418, University of St. Gallen, School of Finance.
    9. Junichi Imai, 2022. "A Numerical Method for Hedging Bermudan Options under Model Uncertainty," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 893-916, June.
    10. Ruodu Wang & Zhenyuan Zhang, 2022. "Simultaneous Optimal Transport," Papers 2201.03483, arXiv.org, revised May 2023.
    11. Milo Bianchi & Jean-Marc Tallon, 2019. "Ambiguity Preferences and Portfolio Choices: Evidence from the Field," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1486-1501, April.
    12. Jonathan Li & Roy Kwon, 2013. "Portfolio selection under model uncertainty: a penalized moment-based optimization approach," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 131-164, May.
    13. Daniel Bartl & Johannes Wiesel, 2022. "Sensitivity of multiperiod optimization problems in adapted Wasserstein distance," Papers 2208.05656, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2023.
    14. Hansen, Lars Peter & Sargent, Thomas J., 2022. "Structured ambiguity and model misspecification," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    15. repec:hal:journl:hal-03031751 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Junyi Chai & Zhiquan Weng & Wenbin Liu, 2021. "Behavioral Decision Making in Normative and Descriptive Views: A Critical Review of Literature," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-14, October.
    17. Nengjiu Ju & Jianjun Miao, 2012. "Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 559-591, March.
    18. Agarwal, Vikas & Arisoy, Y. Eser & Naik, Narayan Y., 2017. "Volatility of aggregate volatility and hedge fund returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(3), pages 491-510.
    19. Fuhrmann, Sven & Kupper, Michael & Nendel, Max, 2021. "Wasserstein Perturbations of Markovian Transition Semigroups," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 649, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    20. Cui, Zhenyu & Lars Kirkby, J. & Nguyen, Duy, 2019. "A general framework for time-changed Markov processes and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(2), pages 785-800.
    21. Jan Obloj & Johannes Wiesel, 2021. "Distributionally robust portfolio maximisation and marginal utility pricing in one period financial markets," Papers 2105.00935, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2021.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2203.10571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.