IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1301.7413.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Switching Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Yoram Singer

Abstract

A constant rebalanced portfolio is an asset allocation algorithm which keeps the same distribution of wealth among a set of assets along a period of time. Recently, there has been work on on-line portfolio selection algorithms which are competitive with the best constant rebalanced portfolio determined in hindsight. By their nature, these algorithms employ the assumption that high returns can be achieved using a fixed asset allocation strategy. However, stock markets are far from being stationary and in many cases the wealth achieved by a constant rebalanced portfolio is much smaller than the wealth achieved by an ad-hoc investment strategy that adapts to changes in the market. In this paper we present an efficient Bayesian portfolio selection algorithm that is able to track a changing market. We also describe a simple extension of the algorithm for the case of a general transaction cost, including the transactions cost models recently investigated by Blum and kalai. We provide a simple analysis of the competitiveness of the algorithm and check its performance on real stock data from the New York Stock Exchange accumulated during a 22-year period.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoram Singer, 2013. "Switching Portfolios," Papers 1301.7413, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1301.7413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.7413
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas M. Cover, 1991. "Universal Portfolios," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 1(1), pages 1-29, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Foster, Dean P. & Vohra, Rakesh, 1999. "Regret in the On-Line Decision Problem," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 29(1-2), pages 7-35, October.
    2. Jin’an He & Shicheng Yin & Fangping Peng, 2024. "Weak aggregating specialist algorithm for online portfolio selection," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(6), pages 2405-2434, June.
    3. Man Yiu Tsang & Tony Sit & Hoi Ying Wong, 2022. "Adaptive Robust Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2206.01064, arXiv.org.
    4. Fabio Stella & Alfonso Ventura, 2011. "Defensive online portfolio selection," International Journal of Financial Markets and Derivatives, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(1/2), pages 88-105.
    5. Erhan Bayraktar & Donghan Kim & Abhishek Tilva, 2024. "Quantifying dimensional change in stochastic portfolio theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 977-1021, July.
    6. Fereydooni, Ali & Barak, Sasan & Asaad Sajadi, Seyed Mehrzad, 2024. "A novel online portfolio selection approach based on pattern matching and ESG factors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Jarrod Wilcox, 2020. "Better portfolios with higher moments," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(7), pages 569-580, December.
    8. Vladimir V'yugin, 2014. "Log-Optimal Portfolio Selection Using the Blackwell Approachability Theorem," Papers 1410.5996, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2015.
    9. R'emi J'ez'equel & Dmitrii M. Ostrovskii & Pierre Gaillard, 2022. "Efficient and Near-Optimal Online Portfolio Selection," Papers 2209.13932, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2025.
    10. James Chok & Geoffrey M. Vasil, 2023. "Convex optimization over a probability simplex," Papers 2305.09046, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2025.
    11. Shmilovici Armin & Ben-Gal Irad, 2012. "Predicting Stock Returns Using a Variable Order Markov Tree Model," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 16(5), pages 1-33, December.
    12. Bin Li & Steven C. H. Hoi, 2012. "On-Line Portfolio Selection with Moving Average Reversion," Papers 1206.4626, arXiv.org.
    13. Alex Garivaltis, 2018. "Super-Replication of the Best Pairs Trade in Hindsight," Papers 1810.02444, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2022.
    14. Ha, Youngmin & Zhang, Hai, 2020. "Algorithmic trading for online portfolio selection under limited market liquidity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 286(3), pages 1033-1051.
    15. Yong Zhang & Xingyu Yang, 2017. "Online Portfolio Selection Strategy Based on Combining Experts’ Advice," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 141-159, June.
    16. Zhengyao Jiang & Dixing Xu & Jinjun Liang, 2017. "A Deep Reinforcement Learning Framework for the Financial Portfolio Management Problem," Papers 1706.10059, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2017.
    17. Schroeder, Pascal & Kacem, Imed, 2020. "Competitive difference analysis of the cash management problem with uncertain demands," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 1183-1192.
    18. Shuo Sun & Rundong Wang & Bo An, 2021. "Reinforcement Learning for Quantitative Trading," Papers 2109.13851, arXiv.org.
    19. Dmitry B. Rokhlin, 2020. "Relative utility bounds for empirically optimal portfolios," Papers 2006.05204, arXiv.org.
    20. Garud N. Iyengar, 2005. "Robust Dynamic Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 257-280, May.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1301.7413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.