IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/1301.4207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Anticipatory Systems, Preferences, Averages: Inflation, Uncertain Phenomena, Management

Author

Listed:
  • Leonid A. Shapiro

Abstract

Behavior of systems that are functions of anticipated behavior of other systems, whose own behavior is also anticipatory but homeostatic and determined by hierarchical ordering, which changes over time, of sets of possible environments that are not co-possible, is proven to be highly non-linear and sensitively dependent on precise parameters. Averages and other kinds of aggregates cannot be calculated for sets of measurements of behavior of systems, defined in this essay, that are "index complex" in this way. This includes many systems, for instance, social behavior, where anticipation of behavior of other individuals plays a central role. Anticipation of preferences of economic actors are discussed in this way. Analysis by way of generalized functions of complex variables is done for these kinds of systems, and equations of change of state are formally described. Behavior that comprises of responses to market interest rates is taken for example. Continuity assumptions in economics analyzed in this context. Anticipatory responses to inflation in economics are discussed. Applications to theory of production are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonid A. Shapiro, 2013. "Anticipatory Systems, Preferences, Averages: Inflation, Uncertain Phenomena, Management," Papers 1301.4207, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2013.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1301.4207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.4207
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. H. Phelps Brown, 1934. "Notes on the Determinateness of the Utility Function: I," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 66-69.
    2. O. Lange, 1934. "The Determinateness of the Utility Function," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 218-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:1301.4207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (arXiv administrators). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.