IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkpbs/055.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consequences of Unpaid Blood Plasma Donations

Author

Listed:
  • Axel Ockenfels
  • Alvin Roth

Abstract

The European Commission is considering new ways to regulate the ‘substances of human origin’ –including blood, plasma, and cells – used in medical procedures from transfusions andtransplants to assisted reproduction. This column argues that such legislation jeopardises theinterests of both donors and recipients. While sympathetic to the intentions behind the proposals–which aim to ensure that donations are voluntary and to protect financially disadvantageddonors – the authors believe such rules overlook the effects on donors, on the supply of suchsubstances, and on the health of those who need them.

Suggested Citation

  • Axel Ockenfels & Alvin Roth, 2023. "Consequences of Unpaid Blood Plasma Donations," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 055, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkpbs/ECONtribute_PB_055_2023.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim & Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "What Motivates Paternalism? An Experimental Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 787-830, March.
    2. Robert Slonim & Carmen Wang & Ellen Garbarino, 2014. "The Market for Blood," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 177-196, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Yefeng & Yang, Wenyuan & Luo, Gansong & Luo, Jun, 2024. "Choosing tournament for children: Parenting style and information intervention," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Cappelen, Alexander W. & Sørensen, Erik Ø. & Tungodden, Bertil & Xu, Xiaogeng, 2025. "Risk taking on behalf of others: Does the timing of uncertainty revelation matter?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 13/2025, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    3. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim & Tony Q. Fan & Zach Freitas-Groff, 2025. "Interventionist preferences and the welfare state: the case of in-kind aid," ECON - Working Papers 471, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.
    4. Carmen Sainz Villalba & Kai A. Konrad, 2024. "Autonomy or Delegation, Libertarianism or Paternalism: what I like for myself and what I like for others on pension savings," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2023-10, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    5. Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2020. "Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 52-74.
    6. Johannes Haushofer & Paul Niehaus & Carlos Paramo & Edward Miguel & Michael Walker, 2025. "Targeting Impact versus Deprivation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(6), pages 1936-1974, June.
    7. Chloe Tergiman & Marie Claire Villeval, 2023. "The Way People Lie in Markets: Detectable vs. Deniable Lies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(6), pages 3340-3357, June.
    8. Ai Takeuchi & Erika Seki, 2019. "Coordination and free-riding problems in blood donations," Discussion Papers in Economics and Business 19-15, Osaka University, Graduate School of Economics.
    9. Bruhin, Adrian & Goette, Lorenz & Haenni, Simon & Jiang, Lingqing, 2020. "Spillovers of prosocial motivation: Evidence from an intervention study on blood donors," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    10. Christian Bayer & Felix Bierbrauer & Axel Ockenfels & Matthias Sutter, 2025. "ECONtribute: Markets & Public Policy: Agenda und ausgewählte Forschungsschwerpunkte," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 352, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    11. Felix Kölle & Simone Quercia & Egon Tripodi, 2023. "Social Preferences under the Shadow of the Future," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 406, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    12. Tianshu Sun & Susan Feng Lu & Ginger Zhe Jin, 2015. "Solving Shortage in a Priceless Market: Insights from Blood Donation," NBER Working Papers 21312, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Ferreira, João V. & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Le Lec, Fabrice & Schokkaert, Erik & Tarroux, Benoît, 2025. "Freedom counts: Cross-country empirical evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Karen Evelyn Hauge & Snorre Kverndokk & Andreas Lange, 2021. "Why People Oppose Trade Institutions - On Morality, Fairness and Risky Actions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9456, CESifo.
    15. Eugen Dimant & Tobias Gesche, 2021. "Nudging Enforcers: How Norm Perceptions and Motives for Lying Shape Sanctions," CESifo Working Paper Series 9385, CESifo.
    16. Sun, Tianshu & Lu, Susan Feng & Jin, Ginger Zhe, 2016. "Solving shortage in a priceless market: Insights from blood donation," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 149-165.
    17. Xiang Han & Onur Kesten & M. Utku Ünver, 2021. "Blood Allocation with Replacement Donors: A Theory of Multi-unit Exchange with Compatibility-based Preferences," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1038, Boston College Department of Economics.
    18. Carmen Sainz Villalba, 2023. "Paternalism Preferences: Differences Across Genders," Working Papers tax-mpg-rps-2023-03, Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance.
    19. Robaina-Calderín, Lorena & Martín-Santana, Josefa D. & Melián-Alzola, Lucía, 2023. "Prosocial customer in the public sector: A PLS-SEM analysis applied to blood donation (active donors)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Björn Bartling & Alexander W. Cappelen & Henning Hermes & Marit Skivenes & Bertil Tungodden, 2023. "Free to fail? Paternalistic preferences in the United States," ECON - Working Papers 436, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised May 2025.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.