IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkpbs/055.html

Consequences of Unpaid Blood Plasma Donations

Author

Listed:
  • Axel Ockenfels
  • Alvin Roth

Abstract

The European Commission is considering new ways to regulate the ‘substances of human origin’ –including blood, plasma, and cells – used in medical procedures from transfusions andtransplants to assisted reproduction. This column argues that such legislation jeopardises theinterests of both donors and recipients. While sympathetic to the intentions behind the proposals–which aim to ensure that donations are voluntary and to protect financially disadvantageddonors – the authors believe such rules overlook the effects on donors, on the supply of suchsubstances, and on the health of those who need them.

Suggested Citation

  • Axel Ockenfels & Alvin Roth, 2023. "Consequences of Unpaid Blood Plasma Donations," ECONtribute Policy Brief Series 055, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkpbs/ECONtribute_PB_055_2023.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim & Axel Ockenfels, 2021. "What Motivates Paternalism? An Experimental Study," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(3), pages 787-830, March.
    2. Robert Slonim & Carmen Wang & Ellen Garbarino, 2014. "The Market for Blood," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 28(2), pages 177-196, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cappelen, Alexander W. & Sørensen, Erik Ø. & Tungodden, Bertil & Xu, Xiaogeng, 2025. "Risk taking on behalf of others: Does the timing of uncertainty revelation matter?," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 13/2025, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    2. Robaina-Calderín, Lorena & Martín-Santana, Josefa D. & Melián-Alzola, Lucía, 2023. "Prosocial customer in the public sector: A PLS-SEM analysis applied to blood donation (active donors)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    3. Ambuehl, Sandro & Blesse, Sebastian & Doerrenberg, Philipp & Feldhaus, Christoph & Ockenfels, Axel, 2023. "Politicians' social welfare criteria - An experiment with German legislators," ZEW Discussion Papers 23-013, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Tristan Gagnon-Bartsch & Antonio Rosato, 2024. "Quality Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Taste Projection in Markets with Observational Learning," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 114(11), pages 3746-3787, November.
    5. Björn Bartling & Krishna Srinivasan, 2025. "Paternalistic Interventions: Determinants of Demand and Supply," CESifo Working Paper Series 11886, CESifo.
    6. Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2020. "Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 52-74.
    7. Leonardo Bursztyn & Benjamin Handel & Rafael Jiménez-Durán & Christopher Roth, 2025. "When Product Markets Become Collective Traps: The Case of Social Media," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(12), pages 4105-4136, December.
    8. Gagnon, Nickolas, 2024. "On your own side of the fence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    9. Kai A. Konrad, 2024. "The political economy of paternalism," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 61-81, October.
    10. Sandro Ambuehl & B. Douglas Bernheim & Tony Q. Fan & Zachary Freitas-Groff, 2025. "Interventionist Preferences and the Welfare State: The Case of In-Kind Aid," NBER Working Papers 33688, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. John Mori, 2026. "Individual Sovereignty and Other-Regarding Preferences," Papers 2606.25904, arXiv.org.
    12. Erkut, Hande & Kübler, Dorothea, 2026. "Repugnant transactions: The role of agency and severe consequences," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 22-33.
    13. Ferreira, João V. & Hanaki, Nobuyuki & Le Lec, Fabrice & Schokkaert, Erik & Tarroux, Benoît, 2025. "Freedom counts: Cross-country empirical evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Cristina Cattaneo & Daniela Grieco & Nicola Lacetera & Mario Macis, 2025. "Out‐group penalties in refugee assistance: a survey experiment," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 127(4), pages 697-741, October.
    15. Bnaya Dreyfuss & Raphael Raux, 2024. "Human Learning about AI," Papers 2406.05408, arXiv.org, revised May 2026.
    16. Slonim, Robert & Wang, Carmen, 2016. "Market Design for Altruistic Supply: Evidence from the Lab," IZA Discussion Papers 9650, IZA Network @ LISER.
    17. Bayer Christian & Bierbrauer Felix & Ockenfels Axel & Sutter Matthias, 2025. "ECONtribute: Markets & Public Policy: Agenda und ausgewählte Forschungsschwerpunkte," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 26(1), pages 34-48.
    18. Michael Haylock & Patrick Kampkötter & Mario Macis & Jürgen Sauter & Susanne Seitz & Robert Slonim & Daniel Wiesen & Alexander H. Schmidt, 2022. "Improving the Availability of Unrelated Stem Cell Donors: Evidence from a Major Donor Registry," NBER Working Papers 29857, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Wilson Lin & Susan Feng Lu & Tianshu Sun, 2023. "Worker Experience and Donor Heterogeneity: The Impact of Charitable Workers on Donors’ Blood Donation Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 939-957, May.
    20. Johannes Haushofer & Paul Niehaus & Carlos Paramo & Edward Miguel & Michael Walker, 2025. "Targeting Impact versus Deprivation," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 115(6), pages 1936-1974, June.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkpbs:055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.