IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ajk/ajkdps/364.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Coarse Categories in a Complex World

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Graeber

    (Harvard Business School)

  • Christopher Roth

    (University of Cologne, CEPR, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, & Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods)

  • Marco Sammon

    (Harvard Business School)

Abstract

Most news stories contain both granular quantitative information and coarse categorizations. For instance, company earnings are typically reported as a dollar figure alongside categorizations, such as whether earnings beat or missed market expectations. We study the hypothesis that when a decision is harder, people rely more on easier-to-process signals: people still discriminate between coarse categories but distinguish less granularly within them, creating higher sensitivity around category thresholds but lower sensitivity elsewhere. Using stock market reactions to earnings announcements, we document that hard-to-value stocks are associated with a more pronounced S-shaped response pattern around category thresholds. Experiments that exogenously manipulate the problem difficulty provide supporting causal evidence in individual investor behavior. We then exploit variation in investor familiarity with earnings surprises of different sizes to show that returns exhibit greater sensitivity in regions with more historical density.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Graeber & Christopher Roth & Marco Sammon, 2025. "Coarse Categories in a Complex World," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 364, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
  • Handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econtribute.de/RePEc/ajk/ajkdps/ECONtribute_364_2025.pdf
    File Function: Second version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert A. Simon, 1955. "A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 69(1), pages 99-118.
    2. Freeman, Rn & Tse, Sy, 1992. "A Nonlinear Model Of Security Price Responses To Unexpected Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(2), pages 185-209.
    3. SANJEEV BHOJRAJ & PAUL HRIBAR & MARC PICCONI & JOHN McINNIS, 2009. "Making Sense of Cents: An Examination of Firms That Marginally Miss or Beat Analyst Forecasts," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2361-2388, October.
    4. Harrison Hong & Jeremy C. Stein, 1999. "A Unified Theory of Underreaction, Momentum Trading, and Overreaction in Asset Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(6), pages 2143-2184, December.
    5. John Y. Campbell & Martin Lettau & Burton G. Malkiel & Yexiao Xu, 2001. "Have Individual Stocks Become More Volatile? An Empirical Exploration of Idiosyncratic Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 56(1), pages 1-43, February.
    6. Kewei Hou & Lin Peng & Wei Xiong, 2009. "A Tale of Two Anomalies: The Implication of Investor Attention for Price and Earnings Momentum," Working Papers 2009-4, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    7. Barberis, Nicholas & Shleifer, Andrei & Vishny, Robert, 1998. "A model of investor sentiment," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 307-343, September.
    8. Kasznik, Ron & Kremer, Ilan, 2014. "The Strategic Timing of Management Earnings Forecasts around Scheduled Releases of Macroeconomic News," Research Papers 3046, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    9. Kothari, S. P. & Sloan, Richard G., 1992. "Information in prices about future earnings : Implications for earnings response coefficients," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2-3), pages 143-171, August.
    10. Marco Di Maggio & Francesco Franzoni & Shimon Kogan & Ran Xing, 2023. "Avoiding Idiosyncratic Volatility: Flow Sensitivity to Individual Stock Returns," NBER Working Papers 31360, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Snehal Banerjee & Jesse Davis & Naveen Gondhi, 2024. "Choosing to Disagree: Endogenous Dismissiveness and Overconfidence in Financial Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 79(2), pages 1635-1695, April.
    12. David Hirshleifer & Sonya Seongyeon Lim & Siew Hong Teoh, 2009. "Driven to Distraction: Extraneous Events and Underreaction to Earnings News," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 64(5), pages 2289-2325, October.
    13. Marco Di Maggio & Francesco A. Franzoni & Shimon Kogan & Ran Xing, 2023. "Avoiding Idiosyncratic Volatility: Flow Sensitivity to Individual Stock Returns," Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper Series 23-108, Swiss Finance Institute.
    14. Pedro Bordalo & Nicola Gennaioli & Giacomo Lanzani & Andrei Shleifer, 2025. "A Cognitive Theory of Reasoning and Choice," NBER Working Papers 33466, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Samuel M. Hartzmark & Kelly Shue, 2018. "A Tough Act to Follow: Contrast Effects in Financial Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1567-1613, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Graeber & Shakked Noy & Christopher Roth & Thomas W. Graeber, 2025. "The Transmission of Reliable and Unreliable Information," CESifo Working Paper Series 12109, CESifo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laarits, Toomas & Sammon, Marco, 2025. "The retail habitat," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    3. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    4. Blankespoor, Elizabeth & deHaan, Ed & Marinovic, Iván, 2020. "Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(2).
    5. Umar, Tarik, 2022. "Complexity aversion when SeekingAlpha," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(2).
    6. Bannigidadmath, Deepa & Narayan, Paresh Kumar, 2016. "Stock return predictability and determinants of predictability and profits," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 153-173.
    7. Peng, Lin & Xiong, Wei, 2006. "Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 563-602, June.
    8. Sharifkhani, Ali & Simutin, Mikhail, 2021. "Feedback loops in industry trade networks and the term structure of momentum profits," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 1171-1187.
    9. Pengcheng Zhang & Kunpeng Xu & Jian Huang & Jiayin Qi, 2024. "Investor sentiment and the holiday effect in the cryptocurrency market: evidence from China," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-36, December.
    10. Lim, Kian-Ping & Kim, Jae H., 2011. "Trade openness and the informational efficiency of emerging stock markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 2228-2238, September.
    11. Wu, Yuliang & Mazouz, Khelifa, 2016. "Long-term industry reversals," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 236-250.
    12. Daniel, Kent & Hirshleifer, David & Teoh, Siew Hong, 2002. "Investor psychology in capital markets: evidence and policy implications," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 139-209, January.
    13. Hui Zeng & Ben R Marshall & Nhut H Nguyen & Nuttawat Visaltanachoti, 2022. "Are individual stock returns predictable?," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 47(1), pages 135-162, February.
    14. Alejandro Bernales & Marcela Valenzuela & Ilknur Zer, 2023. "Effects of Information Overload on Financial Markets: How Much Is Too Much?," International Finance Discussion Papers 1372, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    15. Barberis, Nicholas & Shleifer, Andrei, 2003. "Style investing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 161-199, May.
    16. Fischer, Thomas, 2011. "News Reaction in Financial Markets within a Behavioral Finance Model with Heterogeneous Agents," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 54196, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    17. Joel Peress, 2014. "The Media and the Diffusion of Information in Financial Markets: Evidence from Newspaper Strikes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2007-2043, October.
    18. Tina Kalayil & Somya Tyagi & Mahfuza Khatun & Sikandar Siddiqui, 2019. "A Risk-Sensitive Momentum Approach To Stock Selection," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 64(220), pages 61-84, January –.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:ud7yw_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Atilgan, Yigit & Bali, Turan G. & Demirtas, K. Ozgur & Gunaydin, A. Doruk, 2020. "Left-tail momentum: Underreaction to bad news, costly arbitrage and equity returns," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(3), pages 725-753.
    21. Feng Dong, 0. "Noise-driven abnormal institutional investor attention," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-22.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D01 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ajk:ajkdps:364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ECONtribute Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.econtribute.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.