IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ukstdp/140537.html

Economic Instruments And Waste Minimization: The Need For Discard- And Purchase-Relevant Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Fenton, R.
  • Hanley, Nick

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenton, R. & Hanley, Nick, 1994. "Economic Instruments And Waste Minimization: The Need For Discard- And Purchase-Relevant Instruments," Discussion Papers in Ecological Economics 140537, University of Stirling, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ukstdp:140537
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.140537
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/140537/files/us-94-04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.140537?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Miedema, Allen K., 1983. "Fundamental economic comparisons of solid waste policy options," Resources and Energy, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 21-43, March.
    2. William J. Baumol & Wallace E. Oates, 1971. "The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Peter Bohm & Allen V. Kneese (ed.), The Economics of Environment, pages 53-65, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Don Fullerton & Ann Wolverton, 2002. "The Case for a Two-Part Instrument: Presumptive Tax and Environmental Subsidy," Chapters, in: Don Fullerton & Thomas C. Kinnaman (ed.), The Economics of Household Garbage and Recycling Behavior, chapter 10, pages 175-200, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Frondel, Manuel & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Vance, Colin, 2008. "A Regression on Climate Policy - The European Commission's Proposal to Reduce CO₂ Emissions from Transport," Ruhr Economic Papers 44, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    3. Frans P. Vries & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Incentive-Based Policy Design for Pollution Control and Biodiversity Conservation: A Review," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 63(4), pages 687-702, April.
    4. Salant, Stephen & Seegert, Nathan, 2014. "Private Access Fees and Congestion Is There a Role for Government After All?," Discussion Papers dp-14-26, Resources For the Future.
    5. Carlos Andrés Vasco-Correa & David Tob�n-Orozco & John Harvey Vargas Cano, 2018. "Impuestos ambientales diferenciados espacialmente en Colombia: un modelo teórico de equilibrio general con capital natural," Revista Cuadernos de Economia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, FCE, CID, vol. 37(74), pages 589-624.
    6. Ekkehard von Knorring, 2002. "Oekologische Leistungshonorierung anhand eines Oekopunkte-Systems mit Bieterverfahren," Discussion Paper Series 223, Universitaet Augsburg, Institute for Economics.
    7. Claudia Kettner-Marx & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2018. "Carbon Taxes from an Economic Perspective," WIFO Working Papers 554, WIFO.
    8. Beck, Ulrik R. & Kruse-Andersen, Peter K. & Stewart, Louis B., 2023. "Carbon leakage in a small open economy: The importance of international climate policies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. McQuinn, Kieran & O'Toole, Conor & Coffey, Cathal & Wendy Disch & Eva Shiel & Eoin Kenny, 2021. "Quarterly Economic Commentary, Winter 2021," Forecasting Report, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number QEC2021WIN, February.
    10. Michael Grubb & Tim Laing & Thomas Counsell & Catherine Willan, 2011. "Global carbon mechanisms: lessons and implications," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 104(3), pages 539-573, February.
    11. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Jens Lausen & Moritz Kohlhase, 2021. "Internalizing the externalities of overfunding: an agent-based model approach for analyzing the market dynamics on crowdfunding platforms," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 91(9), pages 1387-1430, November.
    12. Grzegorz Peszko & Markus Amann & Yewande Awe & Gary Kleiman & Tamer Samah Rabie & Markus Amann, 2022. "Air Pollution and Climate Change," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 38524, April.
    13. Henrik Egbert & Teodor Sedlarski, 2019. "Foundations of contemporary economics: William Baumol and entrepreneurship," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 109-117.
    14. Mikami, Kazuhiko, 2010. "Capital procurement of a consumer cooperative: Role of the membership market," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 178-197, June.
    15. Patrick Criqui & Denise Cavard, 2004. "Economic approach to climate policies and stakes of international negotiations," Post-Print halshs-00003793, HAL.
    16. Jonah Busch & Irene Ring & Monique Akullo & Oyut Amarjargal & Maud Borie & Rodrigo S. Cassola & Annabelle Cruz-Trinidad & Nils Droste & Joko Tri Haryanto & Ulan Kasymov & Nataliia Viktorivna Kotenko &, 2021. "A global review of ecological fiscal transfers," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(9), pages 756-765, September.
    17. Brookshire, David S & Burness, H Stuart, 2001. "The Informational Role of the EPA SO2 Permit Auction," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 43-60, July.
    18. Stavins, Robert & Hahn, Robert & Cavanagh, Sheila, 2001. "National Environmental Policy During the Clinton Years," RFF Working Paper Series dp-01-38, Resources for the Future.
    19. Klaus Skytte, 2006. "Interplay between Environmental Regulation and Power Markets," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 4, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).
    20. Jūratė Jaraitė-Kažukauskė & Andrius Kažukauskas, 2015. "Do Transaction Costs Influence Firm Trading Behaviour in the European Emissions Trading System?," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 62(3), pages 583-613, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ukstdp:140537. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/destiuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.