IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/rutdps/36725.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Farmers Markets: Producers Characteristics and Status of Their Businesses

Author

Listed:
  • Govindasamy, Ramu
  • Zurbriggen, Marta
  • Italia, John
  • Adelaja, Adesoji O.
  • Nitzsche, Peter
  • VanVranken, Richard

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of the attributes of producers who participate in farmers’ markets and to examine different aspects of their operations. In addition to demographics, the characteristics explored in this report include farm size, acreage grown, wholesale and retail activities, location, and personnel employed. Data related to business development, ownership status, days of operation, products sold, marketing and organic production was also collected. The results show that the majority of New Jersey growers who retail through farmers’ markets began this type of activity since 1990 and while their businesses were still in a state of growth. However, the average number of acres planted and workers employed characterized farmers’ markets as small scale operations. The income from these facilities represented, in general, less than 40 percent of the total retail gross sales. Most producers indicated that they were satisfied with the profit margin obtained. Farmers usually attended 1 market per day and traveled an average of 54 miles daily. In particular, farmers chose farmers’ markets as a retail channel because they could obtain higher prices, target a greater volume of people, interact with customers and lower overhead costs. Tomatoes, corn, herbs, peaches, flowers, apples and greens were the most important farm products sold based on dollar value. Although the majority of the farmers sold value-added products, only 23 percent of those surveyed offered organic produce. Prices were usually determined by comparison with chain stores or based on cost accounting, market reports or experience. In general, participants believed that their farmers’ market operations would continue to expand over the next five years. The descriptive results presented in this report help identify the characteristics that contribute towards growers’ participation in the farmers’ markets and the factors that make these operations a viable marketing alternative. These findings may be especially useful for those in charge of the planning and coordination of farmers’ markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Govindasamy, Ramu & Zurbriggen, Marta & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Nitzsche, Peter & VanVranken, Richard, 1998. "Farmers Markets: Producers Characteristics and Status of Their Businesses," P Series 36725, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:rutdps:36725
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.36725
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/36725/files/pa980698.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.36725?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eastwood, David B., 1996. "Using Customer Surveys To Promote Farmers' Markets: A Case Study," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 27(3), pages 1-8, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Spiller, Achim & Zuhlsdorf, Anke & Mellin, Matthias, 2007. "Farmer-to-Consumer Direct Marketing: The Role of Customer Satisfaction Measurement for Service Innovations," 2007 1st Forum, February 15-17, 2007, Innsbruck, Austria 6607, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
    2. Dru Montri & Kimberly Chung & Bridget Behe, 2021. "Farmer perspectives on farmers markets in low-income urban areas: a case study in three Michigan cities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Detre, Joshua D. & Mark, Tyler B. & Clark, Benjamin M., 2010. "Understanding Why College-Educated Millennials Shop at Farmers Markets: An Analysis of Students at Louisiana State University," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 41(3), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Fang, Xin & Huang, Hui & Leung, PingSun, 2018. "Competitiveness of local food: an empirical analysis of the tomato market dynamics," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(1).
    3. Klotz, Jennifer-Claire V., 2001. "Farmer Direct Marketing Bibliography 2001," Research Reports 329438, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing Service, Transportation and Marketing Program.
    4. Curtis, Kynda R. & Yeager, Irvin & Black, Brent & Drost, Daniel & Ward, Ruby, 2014. "Market and Pricing Potential for Extended Season Fresh Produce Sales: An Intermountain West Example," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Martinez, Stephen W. & Hand, Michael S. & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan L. & Ralston, Katherine L. & Smith, Travis A. & Vogel, Stephen J. & Clark, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah A. & Newman, , 2010. "Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues," Economic Research Report 96635, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
      • Martinez, Steve & Hand, Michael & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan & Ralston, Katherine & Smith, Travis & Vogel, Stephen & Clarke, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah & Newman, Constance, 2010. "Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues," MPRA Paper 24313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Julie Rice, 2015. "Privilege and exclusion at the farmers market: findings from a survey of shoppers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(1), pages 21-29, March.
    7. Govindasamy, Ramu & Zurbriggen, Marta & Italia, John & Adelaja, Adesoji O. & Nitzsche, Peter & VanVranken, Richard, 1998. "Farmers Markets: Consumer Trends, Preferences, and Characteristics," P Series 36722, Rutgers University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Marketing;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:rutdps:36725. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/darutus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.