IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/quedwp/274713.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pitfalls when Estimating Treatment Effects Using Clustered Data

Author

Listed:
  • MacKinnon, James G.
  • Webb, Matthew D.

Abstract

Inference for estimates of treatment effects with clustered data requires great care when treatment is assigned at the group level. This is true for both pure treatment models and difference-in-differences regressions. Even when the number of clusters is quite large, cluster-robust standard errors can be much too small if the number of treated (or control) clusters is small. Standard errors also tend to be too small when cluster sizes vary a lot, resulting in too many false positives. Bootstrap methods generally perform better than t tests, but they can also yield very misleading inferences in some cases.

Suggested Citation

  • MacKinnon, James G. & Webb, Matthew D., 2017. "Pitfalls when Estimating Treatment Effects Using Clustered Data," Queen's Economics Department Working Papers 274713, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274713
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.274713
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/274713/files/qed_wp_1387.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.274713?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:quedwp:274713. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.