IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/queddp/275191.html

Two Papers on Model Testing and Discrimination

Author

Listed:
  • Fisher, Gordon
  • McAleer, Michael

Abstract

In this note it is demonstrated that Theil's (1961) minimum error variance criterion is asymptotically valid for choosing between non-nested nonlinear regression models, as long as one of the models being considered is 'true'. -- Pereira (1977) raised the issue of consistency of the tests , developed by Cox (1961, 1962) and Atkinson (1970) for separate families of hypotheses and showed that the Cox-test is always consistent whereas Atkinson's procedure is not always consistent. In this paper it is shown that when the null and alternative hypotheses are separate regression models, Atkinson's procedure will always provide a consistent test. It is also shown that, in addition to comparing the actual and expected performances of the alternative when the Coxtest is used, the actual performance of the null becomes relevant for interpreting the outcome of the test based on Atkinson's modification.

Suggested Citation

  • Fisher, Gordon & McAleer, Michael, 1980. "Two Papers on Model Testing and Discrimination," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275191, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:queddp:275191
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.275191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/275191/files/QUEENS-IER-PAPER-416.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.275191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pesaran, M H & Deaton, Angus S, 1978. "Testing Non-Nested Nonlinear Regression Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(3), pages 677-694, May.
    2. M. H. Pesaran, 1974. "On the General Problem of Model Selection," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 41(2), pages 153-171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:rri:wpaper:201303 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Poterba, James M. & Summers, Lawrence H., 1983. "Dividend taxes, corporate investment, and `Q'," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(2), pages 135-167, November.
    3. D. R. Cox, 2013. "A return to an old paper: ‘Tests of separate families of hypotheses’," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 75(2), pages 207-215, March.
    4. Gordon Fisher & Michael McAleer, 1980. "Principles and Methods in the Testing of Alternative Models," Working Paper 400, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    5. McAleer, Michael, 1995. "The significance of testing empirical non-nested models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 149-171, May.
    6. Maalaoui Chun, Olfa & Dionne, Georges & François, Pascal, 2014. "Credit spread changes within switching regimes," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 41-55.
    7. Monfardini, Chiara, 2003. "An illustration of Cox's non-nested testing procedure for logit and probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 425-444, March.
    8. Zhipeng Liao & Xiaoxia Shi, 2020. "A nondegenerate Vuong test and post selection confidence intervals for semi/nonparametric models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 11(3), pages 983-1017, July.
    9. repec:isu:genstf:1996010108000012396 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Massimiliano Marcellino, "undated". "Further Results on MSFE Encompassing," Working Papers 143, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    11. Bouman, J., 1984. "Testing Nonnested Linear Hypotheses I : Reduction By Invariance Considerations," Econometric Institute Archives 272284, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Chen, Changsheng & Girardin, Eric & Mehrotra, Aaron, 2017. "Global slack and open economy Phillips curves – A province-level view from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 74-87.
    13. Harry H. Kelejian & Gianfranco Piras, 2013. "A J-Test for Panel Models with Fixed Effects, Spatial and Time," Working Papers Working Paper 2013-03, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    14. Harry H. Kelejian & Gianfranco Piras, 2016. "A J test for dynamic panel model with fixed effects, and nonparametric spatial and time dependence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1581-1605, December.
    15. Neil R. Ericsson, 1987. "Monte Carlo methodology and the finite sample properties of statistics for testing nested and non-nested hypotheses," International Finance Discussion Papers 317, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
    16. Russell Davidson & James G. Mackinnon, 1982. "Some Non-Nested Hypothesis Tests and the Relations Among Them," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 49(4), pages 551-565.
    17. Lyon, Charles C. & Thompson, Gary D., 1991. "Model Selection With Temporal And Spatial Aggregation: Alternative Marketing Margin Models," Staff Papers 13253, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Haiyong Zhang & Xinyu Wang, 2017. "Combined asymmetric spatial weights matrix with application to housing prices," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(13), pages 2337-2353, October.
    19. Ravi Subramanian & Ramanath Subramanyam, 2012. "Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 315-326, April.
    20. Debarsy, Nicolas & Ertur, Cem, 2019. "Interaction matrix selection in spatial autoregressive models with an application to growth theory," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 49-69.
    21. Luc Anselin, 1988. "Model Validation in Spatial Econometrics: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Approaches," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 11(3), pages 279-316, December.
    22. Dutz, Mark & Hayri, Aydin, 1999. "Does More Intense Competition Lead to Higher Growth?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2249, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:queddp:275191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/qedquca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.