IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/333108.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Estimating the impact of quantitative export restrictions on agricultural trade and prices

Author

Listed:
  • Estrades, Carmen
  • Beckman, Jayson
  • Aguiar, Angel

Abstract

This paper explores the impact of quantitative export restrictions (QER) on global agricultural trade. To do so, we use a global CGE model to simulate the complete removal of QER, and compare results with a complete elimination of export taxes. QER are introduced in the CGE framework in the form of ad-valorem equivalent rates, which are also estimated in this paper. We estimate the ad-valorem equivalents (AVE) of QER for all countries applying the measures at the tariff line level following Kee et al. (2009)’s approach to estimate AVEs of non-tariff barriers on imports. Thus, we first estimate the quantity-impact of QER on exports, and then we transform quantity-impacts into price effects, using the export supply elasticities estimated by Nicita et al. (2018). WE use the AVEs into a global CGE model, GTAP, for export liberalization scenarios. We simulate 3 scenarios: i) a complete removal of QER; ii) a complete removal of export taxes; iii) the removal of both types of export restrictions. We focus on the impact of the removal of export restrictions on international and domestic prices, and agricultural trade and production. We also analyze the impact on welfare, both among countries implementing export restrictions and among importing countries. By econometrically estimating ad valorem equivalent of quantitative export restrictions we i) assess to which extent restrictions are binding and have an impact on trade; ii) compute a measure of export restriction by country, product and type of QER; and iii) provide a valuable input that can be used in CGE models.

Suggested Citation

  • Estrades, Carmen & Beckman, Jayson & Aguiar, Angel, 2019. "Estimating the impact of quantitative export restrictions on agricultural trade and prices," Conference papers 333108, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/333108/files/9490.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yaghoob Jafari & David G. Tarr, 2017. "Estimates of Ad Valorem Equivalents of Barriers Against Foreign Suppliers of Services in Eleven Services Sectors and 103 Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 544-573, March.
    2. Jayson Beckman & Carmen Estrades & Angel Aguiar, 2019. "Export taxes, food prices and poverty: a global CGE evaluation," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(1), pages 233-247, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jayson Beckman & Noé J. Nava & Angelica S. Williams & Steven Zahniser, 2024. "Land competition and welfare effects from Mexico's proposal to ban genetically engineered corn," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1300-1325, May.
    2. Matteo Fiorini & Bernard Hoekman, 2022. "Correction to: EU services trade liberalization and economic regulation: Complements or substitutes?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 231-231, January.
    3. María C. Latorre & Zoryana Olekseyuk & Hidemichi Yonezawa, 2020. "Foreign multinationals in service sectors: A general equilibrium analysis of Brexit," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(11), pages 2830-2859, November.
    4. Carmen Díaz-Mora & Rosario Gandoy & Belén González-Díaz, 2018. "Looking into global value chains: influence of foreign services on export performance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 154(4), pages 785-814, November.
    5. Beckman, Jayson & Ivanic, Maros & Shaik, Saleem, 2023. "How bilateral trade deals get in the way of multilateral agreements: Why WTO is marginalized," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 45(5), pages 877-894.
    6. Lukman OYELAMI & Amara ZONGO, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Non-Tariff Barriers in Services on Intra-African Trade: Global Trade Analysis Project Model," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2022-08, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    7. Hoekman, Bernard & Shepherd, Ben, 2021. "Services Trade Policies and Economic Integration: New Evidence for Developing Countries," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(1), pages 115-134, February.
    8. Beckman, Jayson, 2021. "Reforming Market Access in Agricultural Trade: Tariff Removal and the Trade Facilitation Agreement," USDA Miscellaneous 310408, United States Department of Agriculture.
    9. Michał Przybyliński & Artur Gorzałczyński, 2022. "Applying the input–output price model to identify inflation processes," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Bernard Hoekman & Dominique Njinkeu, 2017. "Integrating Africa: Some Trade Policy Research Priorities and Challenges," RSCAS Working Papers 2017/43, European University Institute.
    11. Roberto Echandi & Maryla Maliszewska & Victor Steenbergen, 2022. "Making the Most of the African Continental Free Trade Area," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 37623, April.
    12. Yoji Kunimitsu & Gen Sakurai & Toshichika Iizumi, 2020. "Systemic Risk in Global Agricultural Markets and Trade Liberalization under Climate Change: Synchronized Crop-Yield Change and Agricultural Price Volatility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-17, December.
    13. Yaghoob Jafari & David G. Tarr, 2017. "Estimates of Ad Valorem Equivalents of Barriers Against Foreign Suppliers of Services in Eleven Services Sectors and 103 Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 544-573, March.
    14. Biyik, Onur, 2021. "Japan-AfCFTA Integration Through Economic Impacts of Alternative EPA Scenarios: Examination of the GTAP 10A MRIO Database," Conference papers 333265, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Roy, Martin, 2019. "Elevating services: Services trade policy, WTO commitments, and their role in economic development and trade integration," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2019-01, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    16. Fukase,Emiko & Martin,William J. & Fukase,Emiko & Martin,William J., 2015. "Economic implications of a potential free trade agreement between India and the United States," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7212, The World Bank.
    17. World Bank Group, 2022. "Fostering Rwanda Competitiveness and Resilience in the Post-COVID-19 Era," World Bank Publications - Reports 38321, The World Bank Group.
    18. So, Roger Yu & Bekkers, Eddy, 2024. "The trade effects of a new agreement on services domestic regulation," WTO Staff Working Papers ERSD-2024-02, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    19. Faizi, Bushra & Shah, Mohamed Eskandar, 2022. "Estimating Protection in Services Sector: A PPML Analysis," Conference papers 333430, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    20. Mr. Diego A. Cerdeiro & Rachel J. Nam, 2018. "A Multidimensional Approach to Trade Policy Indicators," IMF Working Papers 2018/032, International Monetary Fund.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:333108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.