IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332674.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The 100% Organic Agriculture Policy in Bhutan – A gift or a curse?

Author

Listed:
  • Feuerbacher, Arndt
  • Luckmann, Jonas
  • Boysen, Ole
  • Zikeli, Sabine
  • Grethe, Harald

Abstract

Organic agriculture is considered an environment-friendly agricultural system and thus one strategy to make agriculture more sustainable. Bhutan has embraced the ambitious goal of becoming the world’s first 100% organic nation by 2020. Effects of such large-scale conversions at the national level have been rarely studied, particularly in cases of genuine pursued policies. Analysing recent on-farm data in Bhutan we find organic crop yields on average to be 19.1% lower than conventional yields. Based on these yield gaps, we assess the effects of a 100% conversion policy employing an economy-wide model with detailed representation of Bhutan’s agricultural sector incorporating agroecological zones, crop nutrients and field operations. Despite Bhutan’s low dependency on conventional inputs, we find significant welfare losses, particularly for non-agricultural households. The yield gap is the main driver for a strong decline in agricultural output (13.5%). Food supply is largely compensated by increased food imports, which results in a weakening of the country’s cereal self-sufficiency (9.4%). Nitrogen availability declines strongly (22.2%), underlining the need of improved soil-fertility practices e.g. biological fixation of nitrogen. Our results show no benefits for rural labour markets as agricultural wages decrease (1.3%), despite higher labour intensity. The study further highlights policy implications and areas of future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Feuerbacher, Arndt & Luckmann, Jonas & Boysen, Ole & Zikeli, Sabine & Grethe, Harald, 2016. "The 100% Organic Agriculture Policy in Bhutan – A gift or a curse?," Conference papers 332674, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332674
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332674/files/8722.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Acs, S. & Berentsen, P.B.M. & Huirne, R.B.M., 2007. "Conversion to organic arable farming in The Netherlands: A dynamic linear programming analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 405-415, May.
    2. Stephen J Atwood & Somil Nagpal & Nkosinathi V Mbuya & Luc Laviolette, 2014. "Nutrition in Bhutan: Situational Analysis and Policy Recommendations," Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Paper Series 94029, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mzoughi, Naoufel, 2011. "Farmers adoption of integrated crop protection and organic farming: Do moral and social concerns matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1536-1545, June.
    2. Bouali Guesmi & Teresa Serra & Amr Radwan & José María Gil, 2018. "Efficiency of Egyptian organic agriculture: A local maximum likelihood approach," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 441-455, March.
    3. Weerahewa, Jeevika & Dayananda, Dasuni, 2023. "Land use changes and economic effects of alternative fertilizer policies: A simulation analysis with a bio-economic model for a Tank Village of Sri Lanka," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    4. Adiprasetyo, Teguh & Suhartoyo, Hery & Firdaus, Arief, 2017. "Developing Strategy for Advancing Organic Agriculture as Sustainable Agricultural Practice," INA-Rxiv wb37h, Center for Open Science.
    5. Cittadini, E.D. & Lubbers, M.T.M.H. & de Ridder, N. & van Keulen, H. & Claassen, G.D.H., 2008. "Exploring options for farm-level strategic and tactical decision-making in fruit production systems of South Patagonia, Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 98(3), pages 189-198, October.
    6. Guesmi, Bouali & Serra, Teresa & Radwan, Amr & Gil, José María, 2014. "Efficiency of Egyptian Organic Agriculture: a Local Maximum Likelihood Approach," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 183023, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Manal Hamam & Daniela Spina & Roberta Selvaggi & Gabriella Vindigni & Gioacchino Pappalardo & Mario D'Amico & Gaetano Chinnici, 2023. "Financial sustainability in agri-food supply chains: A system approach," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 25(2), pages 135-154.
    8. Luz Maria Castro & Fabian Härtl & Santiago Ochoa & Baltazar Calvas & Leonardo Izquierdo & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Integrated bio-economic models as tools to support land-use decision making: a review of potential and limitations," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 183-211, July.
    9. Feuerbacher, Arndt & McDonald, Scott & Dukpa, Chencho & Grethe, Harald, 2020. "Seasonal rural labor markets and their relevance to policy analyses in developing countries," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Freytag, J. & Britz, W. & Kuhn, T., 2023. "The economic potential of organic production for stockless arable farms importing biogas digestate: A case study analysis for western Germany," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Uematsu, Hiroki & Mishra, Ashok K., 2012. "Organic farmers or conventional farmers: Where's the money?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 55-62.
    12. Hamam, Manal & Spina, Daniela & Selvaggi, Roberta & Vindigni, Gabriella & Pappalardo, Gioacchino & D’Amico, Mario & Chinnici, Gaetano, 2023. "Financial sustainability in agri-food supply chains: A system approach," Economia agro-alimentare / Food Economy, Italian Society of Agri-food Economics/Società Italiana di Economia Agro-Alimentare (SIEA), vol. 25(2), October.
    13. Pradeep Rai & Yadunath Bajgai & Jimba Rabgyal & Tirtha Bdr Katwal & Anthony Ryan Delmond, 2022. "Empirical Evidence of the Livelihood Vulnerability to Climate Change Impacts: A Case of Potato-Based Mountain Farming Systems in Bhutan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-27, February.
    14. Blumenstein, Benjamin & Siegmeier, Torsten & Selsam, Franziska & Möller, Detlev, 2018. "A case of sustainable intensification: Stochastic farm budget optimization considering internal economic benefits of biogas production in organic agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 78-92.
    15. Jahantab, Mahboubeh & Abbasi, Babak & Le Bodic, Pierre, 2023. "Farmland allocation in the conversion from conventional to organic farming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1103-1119.
    16. Argyris Kanellopoulos & Paul Berentsen & Thomas Heckelei & Martin Van Ittersum & Alfons Oude Lansink, 2010. "Assessing the Forecasting Performance of a Generic Bio‐Economic Farm Model Calibrated With Two Different PMP Variants," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 274-294, June.
    17. Boxuan Li & Meng Niu & Jing Zhao & Xi Zheng & Ran Chen & Xiao Ling & Jinxin Li & Yuxiao Wang, 2023. "Agricultural Cultivation Structure in Arid Areas Based on Water–Carbon Nexus—Taking the Middle Reaches of the Heihe River as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Maria Raimondo & Francesco Caracciolo & Concetta Nazzaro & Giuseppe Marotta, 2021. "Organic Farming Increases the Technical Efficiency of Olive Farms in Italy," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Zein Kallas & Teresa Serra & José Maria Gil, 2010. "Farmers’ objectives as determinants of organic farming adoption: the case of Catalonian vineyard production," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(5), pages 409-423, September.
    20. Kiyotaka Masuda, 2023. "Combined Application of a Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm and Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Environmentally Friendly Farming Practices in Japanese Rice Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-22, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332674. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.