IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr07/207826.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The berth allocation problem: a formulation reflecting time Window service deadlines

Author

Listed:
  • Golias, Mihalis
  • Boile, Maria
  • Theofanis, Sotirios

Abstract

The berth-allocation problem (BAP) aims to optimally schedule and assign vessels to berthing areas along a quay. The vessels arrive at the port over a period of time and normally request service and departure within a time window. These time windows are usually determined through contractual agreements between the port operator and the carrier, in terms of time of departure after the vessel’s arrival at the port. Formulations presented in the current literature, reduce the time window to a point in time. In this paper the discrete dynamic BAP (DDBAP) is formulated as a linear MIP problem with the objective to simultaneously minimize the cost from vessels’ late departures (departure past the time window) and maximize the benefits from vessels’ early departures and timely departures (departure before and within the requested time window). Two different models along with numerical examples and a comparison to other BAP models are presented to demonstrate the benefits of the proposed berth scheduling formulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Golias, Mihalis & Boile, Maria & Theofanis, Sotirios, 2007. "The berth allocation problem: a formulation reflecting time Window service deadlines," 48th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Boston, Massachusetts, March 15-17, 2007 207826, Transportation Research Forum.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr07:207826
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207826/files/2007_3A_BerthAllocation_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishimura, Etsuko & Imai, Akio & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 282-292, June.
    2. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2003. "Berth allocation with service priority," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 437-457, June.
    3. Imai, Akio & Sun, Xin & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2005. "Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 199-221, March.
    4. Gerald G. Brown & Kelly J. Cormican & Siriphong Lawphongpanich & Daniel B. Widdis, 1997. "Optimizing submarine berthing with a persistence incentive," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 301-318, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    2. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    3. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    4. Giallombardo, Giovanni & Moccia, Luigi & Salani, Matteo & Vacca, Ilaria, 2010. "Modeling and solving the Tactical Berth Allocation Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 232-245, February.
    5. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    6. Xu, Dongsheng & Li, Chung-Lun & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2012. "Berth allocation with time-dependent physical limitations on vessels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 47-56.
    7. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Canrong Zhang & Li Zheng, 2016. "A Decision Model for Berth Allocation Under Uncertainty Considering Service Level Using an Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-28, December.
    8. Branislav Dragović & Nam Kyu Park & Zoran Radmilović, 2006. "Ship-berth link performance evaluation: simulation and analytical approaches," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 281-299, July.
    9. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    10. Hansen, Pierre & Oguz, Ceyda & Mladenovic, Nenad, 2008. "Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 636-649, December.
    11. Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Vacca, Ilaria, 2013. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the berth allocation problem in bulk ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 14-31.
    12. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Hattori, Masahiro & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2007. "Berth allocation at indented berths for mega-containerships," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 579-593, June.
    13. Imai, Akio & Yamakawa, Yukiko & Huang, Kuancheng, 2014. "The strategic berth template problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-100.
    14. Xiang, Xi & Liu, Changchun & Miao, Lixin, 2017. "A bi-objective robust model for berth allocation scheduling under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 294-319.
    15. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    16. Qingcheng Zeng & Yuanjun Feng & Zigen Chen, 2017. "Optimizing berth allocation and storage space in direct transshipment operations at container terminals," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 19(3), pages 474-503, August.
    17. Shih-Wei Lin & Ching-Jung Ting & Kun-Chih Wu, 2018. "Simulated annealing with different vessel assignment strategies for the continuous berth allocation problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 740-763, December.
    18. Zeng, Qingcheng & Yang, Zhongzhen & Lai, Luyuan, 2009. "Models and algorithms for multi-crane oriented scheduling method in container terminals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 271-278, September.
    19. Lee, Yusin & Chen, Chuen-Yih, 2009. "An optimization heuristic for the berth scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(2), pages 500-508, July.
    20. Shangyao Yan & Chung-Cheng Lu & Jun-Hsiao Hsieh & Han-Chun Lin, 2019. "A Dynamic and Flexible Berth Allocation Model with Stochastic Vessel Arrival Times," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 903-927, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr07:207826. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.