IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v39y2005i3p199-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach

Author

Listed:
  • Imai, Akio
  • Sun, Xin
  • Nishimura, Etsuko
  • Papadimitriou, Stratos

Abstract

This paper addresses the berth allocation problem in a multi-user container terminal. There are two typical schemes for berth allocation: one in discrete locations and the other in continuous locations. The former has the advantage of easiness in scheduling but it has a weakness in that terminal usage is not fully efficient. The latter exhibits the complete opposite characteristics. In previous papers, the authors have developed and presented the discrete location version of the berth allocation problem. In view of the steadily growing trend in increasing the container ship size, more flexible berth allocation planning is mandatory, especially in busy hub ports where ships of various sizes are calling. In this paper, a heuristic for the berth allocation problem in continuous locations is presented. A wide variety of experiments were conducted and the results showed that the heuristic works well from a practical point of view.

Suggested Citation

  • Imai, Akio & Sun, Xin & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2005. "Berth allocation in a container port: using a continuous location space approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 199-221, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:39:y:2005:i:3:p:199-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(04)00050-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishimura, Etsuko & Imai, Akio & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 282-292, June.
    2. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2003. "Berth allocation with service priority," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 437-457, June.
    3. Kim, Kap Hwan & Moon, Kyung Chan, 2003. "Berth scheduling by simulated annealing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 541-560, July.
    4. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "The dynamic berth allocation problem for a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 401-417, May.
    5. K T Park & K H Kim, 2002. "Berth scheduling for container terminals by using a sub-gradient optimization technique," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(9), pages 1054-1062, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    2. Robenek, Tomáš & Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Ropke, Stefan, 2014. "A branch-and-price algorithm to solve the integrated berth allocation and yard assignment problem in bulk ports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 399-411.
    3. Xu, Dongsheng & Li, Chung-Lun & Leung, Joseph Y.-T., 2012. "Berth allocation with time-dependent physical limitations on vessels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 216(1), pages 47-56.
    4. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Canrong Zhang & Li Zheng, 2016. "A Decision Model for Berth Allocation Under Uncertainty Considering Service Level Using an Adaptive Differential Evolution Algorithm," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 33(06), pages 1-28, December.
    5. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    6. Hansen, Pierre & Oguz, Ceyda & Mladenovic, Nenad, 2008. "Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 636-649, December.
    7. Umang, Nitish & Bierlaire, Michel & Vacca, Ilaria, 2013. "Exact and heuristic methods to solve the berth allocation problem in bulk ports," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 14-31.
    8. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Hattori, Masahiro & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2007. "Berth allocation at indented berths for mega-containerships," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(2), pages 579-593, June.
    9. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    10. Shih-Wei Lin & Ching-Jung Ting & Kun-Chih Wu, 2018. "Simulated annealing with different vessel assignment strategies for the continuous berth allocation problem," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 740-763, December.
    11. Imai, Akio & Nishimura, Etsuko & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2013. "Marine container terminal configurations for efficient handling of mega-containerships," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 141-158.
    12. Changchun Liu & Xi Xiang & Li Zheng, 2017. "Two decision models for berth allocation problem under uncertainty considering service level," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 312-344, December.
    13. C. Cheong & K. Tan & D. Liu & C. Lin, 2010. "Multi-objective and prioritized berth allocation in container ports," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 63-103, November.
    14. Zhen, Lu & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2011. "A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 54-68, July.
    15. Ya Xu & Qiushuang Chen & Xiongwen Quan, 2012. "Robust berth scheduling with uncertain vessel delay and handling time," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 192(1), pages 123-140, January.
    16. Giallombardo, Giovanni & Moccia, Luigi & Salani, Matteo & Vacca, Ilaria, 2010. "Modeling and solving the Tactical Berth Allocation Problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 232-245, February.
    17. T. R. Lalita & G. S. R. Murthy, 2022. "Compact ILP formulations for a class of solutions to berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(1), pages 413-439, March.
    18. Zhen, Lu, 2015. "Tactical berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 928-944.
    19. Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Expósito-Izquierdo, Christopher & Melián-Batista, Belén & Moreno-Vega, J. Marcos, 2016. "A Set-Partitioning-based model for the Berth Allocation Problem under Time-Dependent Limitations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 1001-1012.
    20. Imai, Akio & Yamakawa, Yukiko & Huang, Kuancheng, 2014. "The strategic berth template problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 77-100.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:39:y:2005:i:3:p:199-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.