IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nceewp/348902.html

Consideration of Environmental Justice in EPA's Regulatory Analyses: A Review and Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • DeAngeli, Emma
  • Morgenstern, Richard
  • Ünel, Burçin
  • Wolverton, Ann

Abstract

Increasingly, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts environmental justice (EJ) assessments as part of its regulatory analyses for new rules. We inventory and evaluate the available EJ analyses for the EPA’s 68 economically significant final rules issued between 2012 and 2024. We find that three-quarters (53) of these rules include an EJ analysis, and 45 of these analyses are at least partially quantitative. The proportion of rules that include an EJ analysis increased from about 60 percent in 2012 to more than 90 percent within the past three years. While many of the quantitative EJ analyses examined only baseline issues, some of the more recent assessments have used more nuanced methods to assess differences in vulnerability, cumulative impacts, and climate risk. Three EJ analyses consider the incidence of costs across population groups. While recognizing the different budget, data, and modeling constraints across EPA program offices, we emphasize the need to consider EJ at the early stages of the analytical process. We also discuss important gaps in data and methods that are key to examining the underlying heterogeneity in concentrations and health risks, EJ impacts of regulatory options, regulatory costs, and net benefits across demographic groups.

Suggested Citation

  • DeAngeli, Emma & Morgenstern, Richard & Ünel, Burçin & Wolverton, Ann, 2024. "Consideration of Environmental Justice in EPA's Regulatory Analyses: A Review and Assessment," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 348902, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:nceewp:348902
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348902/files/2024-11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348902?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lisa A. Robinson & James K. Hammitt & Richard J. Zeckhauser, 2016. "Attention to Distribution in U.S. Regulatory Analyses," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 308-328.
    2. Spencer Banzhaf & Lala Ma & Christopher Timmins, 2019. "Environmental Justice: The Economics of Race, Place, and Pollution," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(1), pages 185-208, Winter.
    3. repec:reg:rpubli:98 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Ann Wolverton, 2023. "Environmental Justice Analysis for EPA Rulemakings: Opportunities and Challenges," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 17(2), pages 346-353.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. DeAngeli, Emma & Morgenstern, Richard D. & Ünel, Burçin & Wolverton, Ann, 2024. "Consideration of Environmental Justice in EPA’s Regulatory Analyses: A Review and Assessment," RFF Working Paper Series 24-22, Resources for the Future.
    2. Bakkensen, Laura A. & Ma, Lala & Muehlenbachs, Lucija & Benitez, Lina, 2024. "Cumulative impacts in environmental justice: Insights from economics and policy," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    3. Bakkensen, Laura A. & Ma, Lala, 2020. "Sorting over flood risk and implications for policy reform," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2024. "Technical Guidance for Assessment Environmental Justice in Regulatory Analysis," Environmental Economics Guidance Documents 348895, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    5. Hausman, Catherine & Stolper, Samuel, 2021. "Inequality, information failures, and air pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    6. Robert Metcalfe & Sefi Roth, 2025. "Making the Invisible Visible: The Impact of Revealing Indoor Air Pollution on Behavior and Welfare," Framed Field Experiments 00819, The Field Experiments Website.
    7. Colby, Bonnie, 2023. "Teaching Water Resource Economics for Policy Analysis," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 5(3), September.
    8. Austin, Wes & Bardot, Tina & El-Khattabi, Ahmed Rachid, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Service Area Boundaries and Disparities in Drinking Water Quality," National Center for Environmental Economics-NCEE Working Papers 348906, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
    9. Vincent Cheruiyot Kirui1 & Dr. Paul Kipyegon Sang, 2020. "The Quest for Socioeconomic Development in Kenya: A Review of the Impact of Public Infrastructure on the Voyage," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 4(11), pages 145-158, November.
    10. Abatemarco, Antonio & Dell'Anno, Roberto & Lagomarsino, Elena, "undated". "Measuring equity in environmental care: methodology and an application to air pollution," FEEM Working Papers 359332, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    11. Wang Chang & Yun Zhu & Che-Jen Lin & Saravanan Arunachalam & Shuxiao Wang & Jia Xing & Tingting Fang & Shicheng Long & Jinying Li & Geng Chen, 2022. "Environmental Justice Assessment of Fine Particles, Ozone, and Mercury over the Pearl River Delta Region, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Bishop, Kelly C. & Dowling, Jakob & Kuminoff, Nicolai V. & Murphy, Alvin D., 2025. "Tax policy and the heterogeneous costs of homeownership," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    13. Li, Liqing, 2023. "Environmental goods provision and gentrification: Evidence from MillionTreesNYC," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Mathilda Eriksson & Alejandro del Valle & Alejandro de la Fuente, 2025. "Droughts worsen air quality and health by shifting power generation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    15. Mustahsin Aziz & Levan Elbakidze, 2025. "Invisible Barrier: The Impact of Air Quality on Chronic School Absenteeism in the US," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(3), pages 655-680, March.
    16. Nicolli, Francesco & Gilli, Marianna & Vona, Francesco, "undated". "Inequality and Climate Change: Two Problems, One Solution?," FEEM Working Papers 329340, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    17. Lin Yang & Yatang Lin & Jin Wang & Fangyuan Peng, 2024. "Achieving Air Pollution Control Targets with Technology-Aided Monitoring: Better Enforcement or Localized Efforts?," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 16(4), pages 280-315, November.
    18. Can Zou & Jun Tai & Li Chen & Yue Che, 2020. "An Environmental Justice Assessment of the Waste Treatment Facilities in Shanghai: Incorporating Counterfactual Decomposition into the Hedonic Price Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-12, April.
    19. Anne Christine Lusk & Xin Li & Qiming Liu, 2023. "If the Government Pays for Full Home-Charger Installation, Would Affordable-Housing and Middle-Income Residents Buy Electric Vehicles?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, March.
    20. Marc Fleurbaey & Rossi Abi-Rafeh, 2016. "The Use of Distributional Weights in Benefit–Cost Analysis: Insights from Welfare Economics," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10(2), pages 286-307.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nceewp:348902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nepgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.