IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nccc24/379005.html

An Evaluation of how Forecasting Efficiency Leads to Reduced Firm Risks

Author

Listed:
  • DeLong, Karen L.
  • Trejo-Pech, Carlos O.
  • Johansson, Robert

Abstract

The United States (US) Department of Agriculture (USDA) World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates (WASDE) provides forecasts of domestic sugar production and consumption as well as Mexican sugar production. These forecasts are used to assist the USDA in the implementation of US sugar policy. Therefore, this study evaluates the accuracy, bias, and efficiency properties of the USDA WASDE sugar forecasts. Results indicate USDA WASDE domestic sugar production and consumption forecasts, and Mexican sugar production forecasts, are accurate, unbiased, and efficient. US sugar policy helps to ensure the predictability of sugarrelated forecasts, which may then generate positive economic effects for sugar-using firms (SUFs) that rely on reliable knowledge and ability to hedge supplies of an important production input. We postulate that forecast predictability, in turn, reduces SUFs’ risks compared to other agribusinesses. We further postulate that a lower risk environment leads to a superior economic environment for SUFs in which they can financially outperform other agribusiness firms.

Suggested Citation

  • DeLong, Karen L. & Trejo-Pech, Carlos O. & Johansson, Robert, 2024. "An Evaluation of how Forecasting Efficiency Leads to Reduced Firm Risks," 2024 Conference, April 22-23, 2024, St. Louis, Missouri 379005, NCR-134/ NCCC-134 Applied Commodity Price Analysis, Forecasting, and Market Risk Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nccc24:379005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.379005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/379005/files/DeLong_Trejo_Johansson_NCCC-134_2024.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.379005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brown, Lawrence D., 1993. "Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 295-320, November.
    2. John R. Graham & Campbell R. Harvey & Shiva Rajgopal, 2006. "Value Destruction and Financial Reporting Decisions," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(6), pages 27-39, November.
    3. Lewis, Karen E. & Manfredo, Mark R., 2012. "An Evaluation of the USDA Sugar Production and Consumption Forecasts," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 30(2).
    4. Brown, Lawrence D., 1993. "Reply to commentaries on "Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research"," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 343-344, November.
    5. Brown, Philip, 1993. "Comments on 'Earnings forecasting research: its implications for capital markets research' by L. Brown," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 331-335, November.
    6. Siddhartha S. Bora & Ani L. Katchova & Todd H. Kuethe, 2021. "The Rationality of USDA Forecasts under Multivariate Asymmetric Loss," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 1006-1033, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisa Cavezzali & Jacopo Crepaldi & Ugo Rigoni, 2014. "Proximity to hubs of expertise and financial analyst forecast accuracy," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 4(2), pages 157-179, December.
    2. John Capstaff & Krishna Paudyal & William Rees, 1999. "The relative forecast accuracy of UK brokers," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 3-16.
    3. Pagach, Donald P. & Warr, Richard S., 2020. "Analysts versus time-series forecasts of quarterly earnings: A maintained hypothesis revisited," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    4. Lau, Sie Ting & Ng, Lilian & Zhang, Bohui, 2010. "The world price of home bias," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 191-217, August.
    5. Barniv, Ran, 2009. "Does foreign investor demand for information affect forecast accuracy? Evidence from the Chinese stock markets," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 101-118.
    6. Lin, Hai & Tao, Xinyuan & Wu, Chunchi, 2022. "Forecasting earnings with combination of analyst forecasts," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 133-159.
    7. Lorek, Kenneth S., 2014. "A critical assessment of the time-series literature in accounting pertaining to quarterly accounting numbers," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 315-321.
    8. Nejad, Ali Ebrahim & Hoseinzade, Saeid, 2021. "Idiosyncratic return volatility and the role of firm fundamentals: A cross-country analysis," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Michael Firth & Michael Gift, 1999. "An international comparison of analysis' earnings forecast accuracy," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 5(1), pages 56-64, February.
    10. Renê Coppe Pimentel & Andson Braga de Aguiar, 2012. "Persistence of quarterly earnings: an empirical investigation in Brazil," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 9(Special I), pages 38-54, March.
    11. Stephannie Larocque, 2013. "Analysts’ earnings forecast errors and cost of equity capital estimates," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 135-166, March.
    12. Martin, Anna D. & Mauer, Laurence J., 2003. "Exchange rate exposures of US banks: A cash flow-based methodology," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 851-865, May.
    13. Bert De Bruijn & Philip Hans Franses, 2018. "How Informative Are Earnings Forecasts? †," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, July.
    14. Bert de Bruijn & Philip Hans Franses, 2015. "How Informative are the Unpredictable Components of Earnings Forecasts?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 15-032/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    15. Mest, David P. & Plummer, Elizabeth, 1999. "Transitory and persistent earnings components as reflected in analysts' short-term and long-term earnings forecasts: evidence from a nonlinear model," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 291-308, July.
    16. Sam Han & Justin Yiqiang Jin & Tony Kang & Gerald Lobo, 2014. "Managerial Ownership and Financial Analysts’ Information Environment," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(3-4), pages 328-362, April.
    17. John Garcia, 2021. "Analyst herding and firm-level investor sentiment," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 35(4), pages 461-494, December.
    18. Ferreira Savoia, José Roberto & Securato, José Roberto & Bergmann, Daniel Reed & Lopes da Silva, Fabiana, 2019. "Comparing results of the implied cost of capital and capital asset pricing models for infrastructure firms in Brazil," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 149-158.
    19. Ruei-Shian Wu & Hsiou-wei W. Lin, 2014. "Security analysts' incentive and cognitive processing bias: evidence from analysts' recommendations," Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 443-471, December.
    20. Dichev, Ilia D. & Tang, Vicki Wei, 2009. "Earnings volatility and earnings predictability," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 47(1-2), pages 160-181, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nccc24:379005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.farmdoc.illinois.edu/nccc134/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.