IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/mondwp/162528.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Value of Powdery Mildew Resistance in Grapes: Evidence from California

Author

Listed:
  • Fuller, Kate B.
  • Alston, Julian M.
  • Sambucci, Olena

Abstract

Powdery mildew (PM) is a fungal disease that damages many crops, including grapes. In California, wine, raisin, and table grapes contributed over $3.8 billion to the value of California’s farm production in 2011 (California Department of Food and Agriculture, 2012). Grape varieties with resistance to powdery mildew are currently being developed, using either conventional or transgenic approaches, each of which has associated advantages and disadvantages. PM-resistant varieties of grapes could yield large economic benefits to California grape growers—potentially allowing cost savings as high as $70 million per year, but benefits range widely across the different grape production systems. The benefits might be even larger if environmental regulations over the use of pesticides were changed to limit some currently effective PM management protocols. On the other hand, grapes produced using non-vinifera or transgenic vines might suffer a price discount compared with conventional alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuller, Kate B. & Alston, Julian M. & Sambucci, Olena, 2014. "The Value of Powdery Mildew Resistance in Grapes: Evidence from California," Working Papers 162528, Robert Mondavi Institute Center for Wine Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:mondwp:162528
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.162528
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/162528/files/cwe1401.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.162528?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kaplan, Jonathan D. & Norton, Max & Baumgartner, Kendra, 2018. "An ounce of prevention and a pound of cure: the substitutability or complementarity of grapevine trunk disease management practices," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274361, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Christoph Kiefer & Gergely Szolnoki, 2023. "Consumer Acceptance of Fungus-Resistant Grape Varieties—An Exploratory Study Using Sensory Evaluation Tests among Consumers in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Julian M. Alston & Kym Anderson & Olena Sambucci, 2019. "Drifting Towards Bordeaux? The Evolving Varietal Emphasis of U.S. Wine Regions," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Kym Anderson (ed.), The International Economics of Wine, chapter 23, pages 559-598, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    4. Robert Finger & Lucca Zachmann & Chloe McCallum, 2023. "Short supply chains and the adoption of fungus‐resistant grapevine varieties," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(3), pages 1753-1775, September.
    5. Jradi, Samah & Bouzdine Chameeva, Tatiana & Aparicio, Juan, 2019. "The measurement of revenue inefficiency over time: An additive perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 167-180.
    6. Alejandro Fuentes Espinoza & Anne Hubert & Yann Raineau & Céline Franc & Eric Giraud-Héraud, 2018. "Resistant grape varieties and market acceptance:an evaluation based on experimental economics," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2018-22, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    7. Fuller, Kate Binzen & Sanchirico, James N. & Alston, Julian M., 2017. "The Spatial-Dynamic Benefits from Cooperative Disease Control in a Perennial Crop," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 42(2), May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries; Risk and Uncertainty;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:mondwp:162528. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cwucdus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.