IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/miscgh/355515.html

Ecosystem Services Derived by Farmers from Savannah Woodlands in Northern Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Ophelia Kaba-Ayamba

Abstract

There are limited local level studies on all four categories of ecosystem services in Sub-Saharan Africa, which limits knowledge on the influence these services on the well-being of the population studied. The over-reliance on the woodland ecosystem as a result of climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa has led to increased risk of desertification. Improved understanding of the influence of climate change on ecosystem services and local level changes in land use land cover, as well as the value placed on woodlands by local farmers will influence climate change adaptation and poverty alleviation efforts in Sub-Saharan Africa. The study generally sought to assess the benefits smallholder farmers derive from the woodland. It identified the household factors influencing access to different types of woodlands in the Nandom District as well as off-farm adaptation practices that influenced the economic wellbeing of smallholder farming households. The study also examined the relationship between knowledge of climate change and management practices employed by farmers to conserve the woodland. Additionally, the study identified shifts in land use and land cover in the district and assessed willingness to pay for the conservation of the woodlands. Lastly, the study assessed the decomposition of leaves of four common woodland species and their nutrients remaining. Four different research methods were employed due to the multi-disciplinary design, these were the Geographical Information System (GIS) approach, cross-sectional survey, contingent valuation method and leaf litterbag experiment. Land use land cover changes for Nandom district, the study area, were estimated using satellite imageries for 1986, 2001 and 2017. The cross-sectional survey and contingent valuation method involved 303 farming households. Four dominant woodland species, Parkia biglobosa, Vitelleria paradoxa, Cordia myxa and Lannea microcarpa were used for leaf litterbag experiment conducted from May to October of 2017. The results showed a decrease in dense woodland cover by (30%) and area under cultivation (2%), and increase in built environment (9%) over the period 1986 to 2017. The introduction of community laws in the Nandom District in 1985 contributed to the increase in dense woodland cover from 1986 to 2001 (20% increase). The modification of these laws and changes in local level dynamics led to the sharp decrease (42%) in dense woodland cover from 2001 to 2017. Household factors variably influence access to different categories of woodlands identified in the study area- reserve woodland, community woodland and family owned plantation. Sub-district (ρ = 0.002), settlement type (ρ < 0.001), ownership of agricultural land (ρ = 0.020) and bicycle (ρ = 0.017) were associated with access to community woodlands. Ninety-four percent, four percent and two percent of households prefer to contribute farm produce, cash and manpower respectively for woodland conservation in the district. Household minimum and maximum willingness-to-pay (WTP) median values, were 9.50 Ghana cedis ($2.15) and 20.00 Ghana cedis ($4.53) respectively. There was no difference in minimum WTP (ρ = 0.733) and maximum WTP (ρ = 0.725) in choice of conservation strategies- preservation, restoration or both. Results for the litter bag experiment showed C. myxa (0.803 g/g/day) as the fastest decomposing species followed by P. biglobosa (0.784 g/g/day), L. microcarpa (0.77g/g/day) and V. paradoxa (0.544 g/g/day). The same pattern applies to the initial nitrogen content of the species and could therefore be used by smallholder farmers as fertilizers trees or for composting. Households depended on multiple sources of woodland such as community or reserve woodland and family plantation for livelihood opportunities. Community laws play a significant role in preventing loss of woodland cover when well enforced by community chiefs, NGO and the District Assembly. Joint policies and programmes from NGO, Forestry commission, community leaders and the District Assembly to empower communities to use and manage resources are required to promote woodland conservation for sustainable use.

Suggested Citation

  • Ophelia Kaba-Ayamba, 2019. "Ecosystem Services Derived by Farmers from Savannah Woodlands in Northern Ghana," Miscellaneous Publications 355515, University of Ghana, Institute of Statistical Social & Economic Research (ISSER).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:355515
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.355515
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/355515/files/PhD_2019_Ophelia_Kaba-Ayamba.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.355515?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:plo:pone00:0038970 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Robledo, Carmenza & Clot, Nicole & Hammill, Anne & Riché, Béatrice, 2012. "The role of forest ecosystems in community-based coping strategies to climate hazards: Three examples from rural areas in Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 20-28.
    3. Dawson, Neil & Martin, Adrian, 2015. "Assessing the contribution of ecosystem services to human wellbeing: A disaggregated study in western Rwanda," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 62-72.
    4. Nick Hanley & Susana Mourato & Robert E. Wright, 2001. "Choice Modelling Approaches: A Superior Alternative for Environmental Valuatioin?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 435-462, July.
    5. repec:rza:wpaper:693 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Allison Goebel, 1998. "Process, Perception and Power: Notes from ‘Participatory’ Research in a Zimbabwean Resettlement Area," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 29(2), pages 277-305, April.
    7. Fisher, Monica & Chaudhury, Moushumi & McCusker, Brent, 2010. "Do Forests Help Rural Households Adapt to Climate Variability? Evidence from Southern Malawi," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(9), pages 1241-1250, September.
    8. Mamo, Getachew & Sjaastad, Espen & Vedeld, Pal, 2007. "Economic dependence on forest resources: A case from Dendi District, Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(8), pages 916-927, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Harold L. W. Chisale & Paxie W. Chirwa & Folaranmi D. Babalola & Samuel O. M. Manda, 2021. "Perceived Effects of Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events on Forests and Forest-Based Livelihoods in Malawi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Cotta, Jamie N., 2015. "Contributions of local floodplain resources to livelihoods and household income in the Peruvian Amazon," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 35-46.
    3. Philippe Delacote & Julia Girard & Antoine Leblois, 2019. "Agricultural households' adaptation to weather shocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: What implications for land-use change and deforestation," Working Papers 1902, Chaire Economie du climat.
    4. Worku, Adefires & Pretzsch, Jürgen & Kassa, Habtemariam & Auch, Eckhard, 2014. "The significance of dry forest income for livelihood resilience: The case of the pastoralists and agro-pastoralists in the drylands of southeastern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 51-59.
    5. Pritchard, Rose & Grundy, Isla M. & van der Horst, Dan & Ryan, Casey M., 2019. "Environmental incomes sustained as provisioning ecosystem service availability declines along a woodland resource gradient in Zimbabwe," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 325-338.
    6. Pritchard, Rose & Grundy, Isla M. & van der Horst, Dan & Dzobo, Nyaradzo & Ryan, Casey M., 2020. "Environmental resources as ‘last resort’ coping strategies following harvest failures in Zimbabwe," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Mulungu, Kelvin & Kilimani, Nicholas, 2023. "Does forest access reduce reliance on costly shock-coping strategies? Evidence from Malawi," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    8. Baiyegunhi, L.J.S. & Oppong, B.B., 2016. "Commercialisation of mopane worm (Imbrasia belina) in rural households in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 141-148.
    9. Chaikaew, Pasicha & Hodges, Alan W. & Grunwald, Sabine, 2017. "Estimating the value of ecosystem services in a mixed-use watershed: A choice experiment approach," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 228-237.
    10. Andrea Baranzini & Stefano Carattini & Linda Tesauro, 2021. "Designing Effective and Acceptable Road Pricing Schemes: Evidence from the Geneva Congestion Charge," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(3), pages 417-482, July.
    11. Pouliot, Mariève & Treue, Thorsten, 2013. "Rural People’s Reliance on Forests and the Non-Forest Environment in West Africa: Evidence from Ghana and Burkina Faso," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 180-193.
    12. Pierre-Alexandre Mahieu & Henrik Andersson & Olivier Beaumais & Romain Crastes dit Sourd & Stephane Hess & François-Charles Wolf, 2017. "Stated preferences: a unique database composed of 1657recent published articles in journals relatedto agriculture, environment, or health," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 98(3), pages 201-220.
    13. Soltani, Arezoo & Angelsen, Arild & Eid, Tron & Naieni, Mohammad Saeid Noori & Shamekhi, Taghi, 2012. "Poverty, sustainability, and household livelihood strategies in Zagros, Iran," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 60-70.
    14. Anabela Botelho & Lina Sofia Lourenço-Gomes & Lígia Costa Pinto & Sara Sousa & Marieta Valente, 2016. "Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: two stated preferences approaches," NIMA Working Papers 64, Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA), Universidade do Minho.
    15. Aude Ridier & Caroline Roussy & Karim Chaib, 2021. "Adoption of crop diversification by specialized grain farmers in south-western France: evidence from a choice-modelling experiment," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 102(3), pages 265-283, September.
    16. Faure, Corinne & Guetlein, Marie-Charlotte & Schleich, Joachim & Tu, Gengyang & Whitmarsh, Lorraine & Whittle, Colin, 2022. "Household acceptability of energy efficiency policies in the European Union: Policy characteristics trade-offs and the role of trust in government and environmental identity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Ling Li & Xingming Li & Hanghang Fan & Jie Lu & Xiuli Wang & Tianlin Zhai, 2024. "Quantifying and Zoning Ecological Compensation for Cultivated Land in Intensive Agricultural Areas: A Case Study in Henan Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    18. de Ayala, Amaia & Hoyos, David & Mariel, Petr, 2015. "Suitability of discrete choice experiments for landscape management under the European Landscape Convention," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 79-96.
    19. Meyer, Maximilian & Hulke, Carolin & Kamwi, Jonathan & Kolem, Hannah & Börner, Jan, 2022. "Spatially heterogeneous effects of collective action on environmental dependence in Namibia’s Zambezi region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    20. Barr, Rhona F. & Mourato, Susana, 2014. "Investigating fishers' preferences for the design of marine Payments for Environmental Services schemes," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 91-103.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:miscgh:355515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/issergh.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.