IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi09/59037.html

Food Chain Concept in Food and Rural Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Bertazzoli, Aldo
  • Ghelfi, Rino
  • Rivaroli, Sergio
  • Samoggia, Antonella

Abstract

Food chain concept was firstly used as a private sector concept applied in order to optimise chain organisation and to create value along the chain. It is now becoming an approach to understand relations within a socio-economic area, both for economic and production aims and to gain a territorial and rural development perspective. Currently food chain policy is often the result of a negotiating process involving different socio-economic policy areas and many stakeholders. The objective of the present paper is to analyse the food chain concept in rural and food policy context, to explore its interconnections with other socio-economic policy areas, and to identify the main policy perspectives in which the concept of food chain was used. A significant number of international bodies, European Union institutions and national rural programming documents containing specific reference to the food chain were studied with a content analysis methodology based on a common attributes grid. A Boolean matrix was created so to identify some cognitive relations between socio-economic policy areas and topics through the examination of the connected perceptual map built using multidimensional scaling method (MDS). Documents analysis shows that the food chain concept is mainly used in food policy strategy documents, but it is increasingly adopted as a theoretical instrument for territorial and rural policy documents. Food chain concept contains conceptual declinations which refer to both food and rural policies. Beyond the improvement of food safety and quality standards, it is widely used as instrument for agro-food competitiveness, improvement of management, territorial and rural development. Food chain initiatives impact on an increasing number of economic sectors, planning levels and interest groups and the stages of the food chain mostly targeted are the farmers/ primary producers and the consumer. Moreover, the analysis shows a lack of a European common interpretation and clear acknowledgement of the use of the food chain approach and the policy documents and regulations highlight food chain issues only partially if compared with private stakeholders and research bodies. At international level, there is an increasing attention on network and systemic relations in the agro-food sector and along the different actors of the chain, but the full strength of the food chain paradigm could be more widely exploited.

Suggested Citation

  • Bertazzoli, Aldo & Ghelfi, Rino & Rivaroli, Sergio & Samoggia, Antonella, 2009. "Food Chain Concept in Food and Rural Policy," 2009 International European Forum, February 15-20, 2009, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 59037, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59037
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.59037
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/59037/files/Rivaroli-Samoggia.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.59037?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Jack & Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd & Alistair R. Anderson, 2008. "Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: a processual perspective," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 125-159, March.
    2. Kulmala, Harri I. & Paranko, Jari & Uusi-Rauva, Erkki, 2002. "The role of cost management in network relationships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 33-43, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jean–Luc Arregle & Bat Batjargal & Michael A. Hitt & Justin W. Webb & Toyah Miller & Anne S. Tsui, 2015. "Family Ties in Entrepreneurs’ Social Networks and New Venture Growth," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(2), pages 313-344, March.
    2. Rhiannon Pugh & Danny Soetanto & Sarah L. Jack & Eleanor Hamilton, 2021. "Developing local entrepreneurial ecosystems through integrated learning initiatives: the Lancaster case," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 833-847, February.
    3. Soulé Akinhola Adéchian & Mohamed Nasser Baco & Luke Oyesola Olarinde & Ismail Moumouni & David C. Natcher, 2022. "Social Ties Development as Competitive Strategies in Vegetables Marketing: Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Benin," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 1030-1049, April.
    4. Peter W. Moroz & Kevin Hindle, 2012. "Entrepreneurship as a Process: Toward Harmonizing Multiple Perspectives," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(4), pages 781-818, July.
    5. Martina Musteen & Ross Curran & Nuno Arroteia & Maria Ripollés & Andreu Blesa, 2018. "A Community of Practice Approach to Teaching International Entrepreneurship," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Christopher Hayter, 2013. "Conceptualizing knowledge-based entrepreneurship networks: perspectives from the literature," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 899-911, December.
    7. Hadjielias, Elias & Christofi, Michael & Tarba, Shlomo, 2021. "Knowledge hiding and knowledge sharing in small family farms: A stewardship view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 279-292.
    8. Alistair R. Anderson & Johan Gaddefors, 2016. "Entrepreneurship as a community phenomenon; reconnecting meanings and place," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 28(4), pages 504-518.
    9. Smith, Claudia & Smith, J. Brock & Shaw, Eleanor, 2017. "Embracing digital networks: Entrepreneurs' social capital online," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 18-34.
    10. Claudio Petti & Lorenzo Compagnucci & Yongli Tang, 2024. "Institutions, innovation and performance in Guangdong firms: The role of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental turbulence," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 393-419, March.
    11. Kunusia Lilian Khalayi & Prof. Gregory Simiyu Namusonge & Dr. Susan Naikuru, 2024. "Influence of Human Capital Ecosystem on Growth of Leather Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises in Kenya," International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, IPRJB, vol. 9(1), pages 56-69.
    12. Lange Bastian & Streit Anne von, 2013. "Governance of creative industries: A comparison of the characteristics and challenges in the software/games industry in Munich and Leipzig," ZFW – Advances in Economic Geography, De Gruyter, vol. 57(1-2), pages 122-138, October.
    13. Robert Huggins & Piers Thompson, 2015. "Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 45(1), pages 103-128, June.
    14. McKeever, Edward & Jack, Sarah & Anderson, Alistair, 2015. "Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 50-65.
    15. Stentoft, Jan & Mikkelsen, Ole Stegmann & Jensen, Jesper Kronborg & Rajkumar, Christopher, 2018. "Performance outcomes of offshoring, backshoring and staying at home manufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 199-208.
    16. Czernek-Marszałek, Katarzyna, 2020. "The overembeddedness impact on tourism cooperation," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    17. Jakobsen, Morten, 2006. "A survey of trust, control and information in networks," Management Accounting Research Group Working Papers M-2006-01, University of Aarhus, Aarhus School of Business, Department of Business Studies.
    18. Julia Keidel & Peter M. Bican & Frederik J. Riar, 2021. "Influential Factors of Network Changes: Dynamic Network Ties and Sustainable Startup Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Kalm, Matias, 2012. "The Impact of Networking on Firm Performance - Evidence from Small and Medium-Sized Firms in Emerging Technology Areas," Discussion Papers 1278, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    20. Soetanto, Danny, 2019. "Examining change in entrepreneurial networks: Using visualisation as an alternative approach," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 139-150.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi09:59037. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.