IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277389.html

The impacts of regional differences on farmland consolidation in Japan: The case of Tohoku, Hokuriku and Kinki

Author

Listed:
  • Oda, M.
  • Umetsu, C.
  • Shen, J.

Abstract

This paper conducted cross-sectional and panel census data analysis from year 2005 and 2010 in addition to factor share analysis to consider the regional differences that impact farmland consolidation in three areas of Japan, namely Tohoku, Hokuriku, and Kinki. First, the characteristics of each area indicated differential influences on the performance of the land consolidation policy. Second, organized farm management bodies such as village-based farming organization approved by the government also had positive impacts on farmland consolidation. The results of factor share analysis indicated three points. First, the effect of the number of Non-farmer with farmland ownerships had highest share in all areas. Second, the impacts of regionally differential characteristics on farmland consolidation had individual characteristic effects of municipality and time effect such as Kinki has high contribution rate of farm-work contract farming management body in panel data than cross-sectional data. Third, the factors that characterized the problem of each area showed higher effect on farmland consolidation. The government needs to consider regional differences when making decisions on farmland consolidation policies. . Acknowledgement :

Suggested Citation

  • Oda, M. & Umetsu, C. & Shen, J., 2018. "The impacts of regional differences on farmland consolidation in Japan: The case of Tohoku, Hokuriku and Kinki," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277389, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277389
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277389/files/1923.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Roberts & Nigel Key, 2008. "Agricultural Payments and Land Concentration: A Semiparametric Spatial Regression Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 627-643.
    2. Arimoto, Yutaka & Nakajima, Shinsaku, 2010. "Review of Liquidization and Concentration of Farmland in Japan," Journal of Rural Economics, Agricultural Economics Society of Japan, vol. 82(01), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2005. "The potential of land rental markets in the process of economic development: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 241-270, October.
    4. Shenggen Fan & Connie Chan‐Kang, 2005. "Is small beautiful? Farm size, productivity, and poverty in Asian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 32(s1), pages 135-146, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jia, Lili, 2012. "Land fragmentation and off-farm labor supply in China," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 66, number 66.
    2. Cao, Yueming & Bai, Yunli & Zhang, Linxiu, 2021. "Plot Size, Adjacency, and Farmland Rental Contract Choice," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315378, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jian Zhang & Ashok K. Mishra & Peixin Zhu, 2021. "Land rental markets and labor productivity: Evidence from rural China," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 93-115, March.
    4. Zhang, Jian & Mishra, Ashok K. & Zhu, Peixin, 2023. "Land Markets and Labor Productivity: Empirical Evidence from China," IZA Discussion Papers 16575, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    5. Takahashi, Daisuke, 2012. "Farmland Liquidization and Transaction Costs," Japanese Journal of Agricultural Economics (formerly Japanese Journal of Rural Economics), Agricultural Economics Society of Japan (AESJ), vol. 14, pages 1-19.
    6. Wenjing Han & Zhengfeng Zhang & Xiaoling Zhang & Li He, 2021. "Farmland Rental Participation, Agricultural Productivity, and Household Income: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    7. Hui Xiao & Xian Liang & Shu Xing & Longjunjiang Huang & Fangting Xie, 2023. "Does Land Lease Affect the Multidimensional Poverty Alleviation? The Evidence from Jiangxi, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Wang, Hui & Riedinger, Jeffrey & Jin, Songqing, 2015. "Land documents, tenure security and land rental development: Panel evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 220-235.
    9. Klaus Deininger & Denys Nizalov & Sudhir K Singh, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture? Exploring the farm size-productivity relationship for large commercial farms in Ukraine," Discussion Papers 49, Kyiv School of Economics.
    10. B Kelsey Jack, "undated". "Market Inefficiencies and the Adoption of Agricultural Technologies in Developing Countries," CID Working Papers 50, Center for International Development at Harvard University.
    11. Daquan Huang & Shihao Zhu & Tao Liu & Pingping Ma, 2022. "Do land ownership types matter in manufacturing firms’ location choice? Using Beijing as a case study," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(1), pages 151-169, March.
    12. Wenjun Guo & Wei Zhao & Min Min, 2022. "Operation Scale, Transfer Experience, and Farmers’ Willingness toward Farmland Transfer-In: A Case Study of Rice–Crayfish Cultivating Regions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Deininger, Klaus & Nizalov, Denys & Singh, Sudhir K, 2013. "Are mega-farms the future of global agriculture ? exploring the farm size-productivity relationship," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6544, The World Bank.
    14. Daymard, Arnaud, 2022. "Land rental market reforms: Can they increase outmigration from agriculture? Evidence from a quantitative model," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    15. Deng, Xin & Xu, Dingde & Zeng, Miao & Qi, Yanbin, 2019. "Does early-life famine experience impact rural land transfer? Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 58-67.
    16. Ayala-Cantu, Luciano & Morando, Bruno, 2020. "Rental markets, gender, and land certificates: Evidence from Vietnam," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    17. Yahui Wang, 2019. "What Affects Participation in the Farmland Rental Market in Rural China? Evidence from CHARLS," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    18. Liu, Shouying & Ma, Sen & Yin, Lijuan & Zhu, Jiong, 2023. "Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    19. Hu, Chaoran & Chen, Kevin Z. & Reardon, Thomas, 2015. "Is There a City Size Bias? Destination Choice of Rural off-Farm Workers, Evidences from Three Areas in Rural China," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205535, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Li, Rui & Li, Qinghai & Lv, Xiaofeng & Zhu, Xi, 2019. "The land rental of Chinese rural households and its welfare effects," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 204-217.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.