IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic and Environmental Assessment of a Glyphosate Ban for the Example of Maize Production

Author

Listed:
  • Finger, R.
  • Bocker, T.
  • Britz, W.
  • Mohring, N.

Abstract

The effects of a glyphosate ban on cultivation of silage maize are simulated using a spatially explicit bio-economic model that accounts for different pre- and post-sowing weed control strategies and production risks. We analyse the effects of a glyphosate ban on farmers choices of field-level weed control strategies. These strategies are evaluated in two environmental dimensions. More specifically, we consider a pesticide load indicator to assess environmental toxicity, fate and human health effects as well as the energy demand of the agricultural system. We find that a glyphosate ban leads to a significant reduction of the pesticide load of silage maize production. However, a glyphosate ban also leads to somewhat higher energy consumption. Acknowledgement : We thank Ganga Ram Maharjan and Thomas Gaiser from the Crop Science Group of University of Bonn for providing yield data for this research. Furthermore, we thank the plant protection consultants of the Chamber of Agriculture of NRW and of the Chamber of Agriculture of Lower Saxony for providing valuable information supporting this research.

Suggested Citation

  • Finger, R. & Bocker, T. & Britz, W. & Mohring, N., 2018. "An Economic and Environmental Assessment of a Glyphosate Ban for the Example of Maize Production," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277005, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277005
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277005/files/550.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Walsh, Alison & Kingwell, Ross, 2021. "The Future of Glyphosate in Australian Agriculture," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 29(4), November.
    2. Koppenberg, Maximilian & Hirsch, Stefan & Finger, Robert, 2023. "Effects of the debate on glyphosate's carcinogenic risk on pesticide producers' share prices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    3. Robert Huber & Hang Xiong & Kevin Keller & Robert Finger, 2022. "Bridging behavioural factors and standard bio‐economic modelling in an agent‐based modelling framework," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 35-63, February.
    4. Möhring, Niklas & Finger, Robert, 2022. "Pesticide-free but not organic: Adoption of a large-scale wheat production standard in Switzerland," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    5. Mack, G. & Finger, R. & Ammann, J. & El Benni, N., 2023. "Modelling policies towards pesticide-free agricultural production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    6. Florence Jacquet & Nathalie Delame & Jesus Lozano Vita & Christian Huyghe & Xavier Reboud, 2021. "The micro-economic impacts of a ban on glyphosate and its replacement with mechanical weeding in French vineyards," Post-Print hal-03318887, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.