IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/fcnddp/16473.html

A Multiple-Method Approach To Studying Childcare In An Urban Environment: The Case Of Accra, Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Ruel, Marie T.
  • Armar-Klemesu, Margaret
  • Arimond, Mary

Abstract

This document summarizes findings from the Accra Urban Food and Nutrition Study (AUFNS) about the importance of care as an input to child nutrition and the relative contribution of various maternal and household resources to the provision of care. Findings from the quantitative survey (n = 556) and the in-depth observational study (n = 22) are reviewed and complemented with insights from the participatory rapid appraisals (PRAs) carried out at the onset of the study. Results of each phase of the research have been reported separately; this report aims to integrate findings from all three components. The key findings related to the five main questions addressed by this study are summarized as follows. ! Is care an important input into child nutrition in Accra? The Accra study provides unequivocal evidence of the critical role of childcare practices as a key input into children’s nutritional status. ! Which care practices seem to be most crucial for child nutrition? Findings from the observational study confirmed the suggestion from the quantitative survey that optimal feeding practices during the first 6 months of life contribute to the prevention of growth failure among young infants in Accra and that the benefits may linger beyond the first year of life. ! Which maternal and household resources contribute the most to enhancing care in Accra? Maternal education was the characteristic most strongly associated with good childcare practices. For the majority of women, employment did not seem to be a severe constraint for childcare and nutrition in this context. However, maternal early return to work after delivery—usually a response to economic constraints—may entail risks for children. ! What are the program and policy responses to promote optimal childcare practices in this urban context? Our findings support the universal consensus on the importance of investing in girls’ education. In the short term, effective nutrition education and behavior change strategies can simulate some of the benefits of formal education. Support for workingwomen in the form of low-cost, community-based childcare facilities should also be given priority, as well as policies to address poverty alleviation, income generation, hygiene and sanitation, and quality control of street food sales. ! How do the three research approaches used for the measurement of childcare complement each other? Each method provided unique information and also enriched and informed interpretation of other study components. The “triangulation” of findings also helped generate additional hypotheses that could be tested using an iterative process of analysis. This allowed for obtaining a richer and more complete picture of the role of care as an input into child nutrition in Accra.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruel, Marie T. & Armar-Klemesu, Margaret & Arimond, Mary, 2001. "A Multiple-Method Approach To Studying Childcare In An Urban Environment: The Case Of Accra, Ghana," FCND Discussion Papers 16473, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16473
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16473/files/fc010116.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:fcnddp:16473. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.