IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/faoaes/289004.html

Livestock assets, livestock income and rural households: Cross-country evidence from household surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Pica-Ciamarra, Ugo
  • Tasciotti, Luca
  • Otte, Joachim
  • Zezza, Alberto

Abstract

This paper investigates the livestock asset positions of rural households and the contribution of livestock to their income in 12 developing countries. It draws on the FAO Rural Income Generating Activities (RIGA) database, which allows cross-country comparisons of household surveys. The majority of rural households keep livestock; the rural poor, defined as those living in rural areas and belonging to the bottom expenditure quintile, are more likely to keep livestock than those in higher quintiles; there are minor differences in herd composition between households, and the contribution of livestock to total income is overall small, with no significant differences across households.

Suggested Citation

  • Pica-Ciamarra, Ugo & Tasciotti, Luca & Otte, Joachim & Zezza, Alberto, "undated". "Livestock assets, livestock income and rural households: Cross-country evidence from household surveys," ESA Working Papers 289004, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Agricultural Development Economics Division (ESA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:faoaes:289004
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.289004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/289004/files/a-am724e.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.289004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolier Torres & Verónica Andrade & Marco Heredia-R & Theofilos Toulkeridis & Kleber Estupiñán & Marcelo Luna & Carlos Bravo & Antón García, 2022. "Productive Livestock Characterization and Recommendations for Good Practices Focused on the Achievement of the SDGs in the Ecuadorian Amazon," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Adeolu Ayanwale & Christianah Amusan, 2014. "Livelihood Strategies of Female Indigenous Vegetable Farmers’ in Osun State, Nigeria," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(10), pages 1-96, September.
    3. Sadeghi, Azin & Zhunusova, Eliza & Günter, Sven & Dieter, Matthias, 2023. "Households' livelihood in restricted forest landscapes: What is the impact of contextual factors?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Creed, Christian, 2021. "Present Bias Predicts Low Adoption of Profitable Technologies : The Case of Livestock Vaccination in Northern Laos," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 27, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    5. Boulaga,Amadou Adamou Kalilou & Federighi,Giovanni & Hiernaux, Pierre & Zezza,Alberto & Boulaga,Amadou Adamou Kalilou & Federighi,Giovanni & Hiernaux, Pierre & Zezza,Alberto, 2014. "Milking the data : measuring income from milk production in extensive livestock systems -- experimental evidence from Niger," Policy Research Working Paper Series 7114, The World Bank.
    6. Carlo Azzarri & Elizabeth Cross, 2016. "Improved Spatially Disaggregated Livestock Measures for Uganda," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 46(1), pages 37-73, Winter.
    7. Prabhat Khanal & Rajan Dhakal & Tanka Khanal & Deepak Pandey & Naba Raj Devkota & Mette Olaf Nielsen, 2022. "Sustainable Livestock Production in Nepal: A Focus on Animal Nutrition Strategies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Ugo Pica-Ciamarra & Derek Baker & Nancy Morgan & Alberto Zezza, 2011. "Measuring the Contribution of Livestock to Household Livelihoods : A Livestock Module for Multi-topic Household Surveys," World Bank Publications - Reports 17889, The World Bank Group.
    9. Simphiwe Innocentia Hlatshwayo & Rob Slotow & Mjabuliseni Simon Cloapas Ngidi, 2023. "The Role of Smallholder Farming on Rural Household Dietary Diversity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, February.
    10. Munkhnasan Tsvegemed & Alimu Shabier & Eva Schlecht & Greta Jordan & Martin Wiehle, 2018. "Evolution of Rural Livelihood Strategies in a Remote Sino-Mongolian Border Area: A Cross-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, March.
    11. Nyanjige Mbembela Mayala & Mangasini Atanasi Katundu & Elibariki Emmanuel Msuya, 2019. "Socio-cultural Factors influencing livestock investment decisions among Smallholder Farmers in Mbulu and Bariadi Districts, Tanzania," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 20(5), pages 1214-1230, October.
    12. Hall, D., 2018. "Perceptions and mitigation of risk of waterborne disease in Vietnam among small scale integrated livestock farmers," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275875, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    13. Ojeda Luna, Tatiana & Zhunusova, Eliza & Günter, Sven & Dieter, Matthias, 2020. "Measuring forest and agricultural income in the Ecuadorian lowland rainforest frontiers: Do deforestation and conservation strategies matter?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    14. Bright K. D. Tetteh & Samuel A. Donkoh & Isaac G. K. Ansah, 2024. "Climate change coping and adaptation and its effect on livestock herd size and farmers’ welfare in the Upper West Region of Ghana," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 30477-30499, December.
    15. Al-Amin, A.K.M. Abdullah & Hossain, M.J., 2019. "Impact of non-farm income on welfare in rural Bangladesh: Multilevel mixed-effects regression approach," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 95-102.
    16. Yadav, Srishti, 2024. "Animal Husbandry and Social Reproduction: A Case Study from Haryana," Review of Agrarian Studies, Foundation for Agrarian Studies, vol. 14(01).
    17. Julio C. Vargas-Burgos & Marco Heredia-R & Yenny Torres & Laura Puhl & Biviana N. Heredia & Jhenny Cayambe & Julio Hernán-González & Alexandra Torres & Marcelo Luna & Theofilos Toulkeridis & Bolier To, 2023. "Livelihoods and Perceptions of Climate Change among Dairy Farmers in the Andes: Implications for Climate Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:faoaes:289004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/faoooit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.