IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eptddp/16058.html

Natural Resource Management In The Hillsides Of Honduras: Bioeconomic Modeling At The Micro-Watershed Level

Author

Listed:
  • Barbier, Bruno
  • Bergeron, Gilles

Abstract

The objective of this study is to simulate the effect of population pressure, market integration, technological improvement and policy decisions on natural resource management in the hillsides of Honduras. To do so, we developed a bioeconomic model that combines dynamic linear programming with a biophysical model, then applied this model to a typical microwatershed. Over recent years, farmers from the selected microwatershed have followed a "vegetables-intensive" pathway of development. We ran different scenarios with historical data over the period 1975 to 1995 and then projected 25 years into the future from 1995 to 2020. The results of the bioeconomic model presented in this paper help to test a number of induced innovation hypotheses. Many of our hypotheses are confirmed, but some of the model's results challenge conventional wisdom. The simulation results confirm that technology improvements such as irrigation and new varieties can help overcome diminishing returns to labor due to population pressure. Population increases in La Lima had only a small effect on the condition of natural resources because the cropped area increased only slowly thanks to the intensification of production. The model confirms that the relationship between population growth and natural resource condition has a U-shaped structure. In the long term, population pressure is likely to lead to continuing improvement in the condition of natural resources. The hypothesis that improvements in access to markets increase per capita incomes was confirmed by our results, but improvements in access to markets do not necessarily promote land conservation because land values do not necessarily increase. The hypothesis that agroecological conditions are the most important factors determining incomes and natural resource condition is confirmed by the results. Past policy interventions such as market liberalization, road construction, construction of the potable water distribution system, crop variety improvement and extension services have all helped to increase incomes. However, the simulations suggest that had the government banned inorganic fertilizer, undertaken a land reform, or promoted dairy production during 1975 to 1995, these policies would not have been successful. The forward looking baseline scenario suggests that erosion will continue to increase if prices remain constant. If commodity prices decline, however, erosion will decline because farmers will reduce their production of vegetables during the rainy season. Conversely, an increase in inorganic fertilizer prices will lead to more erosion because farmers will use less fertilizer, obtain lower yields, and increase their cropped area.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbier, Bruno & Bergeron, Gilles, 1998. "Natural Resource Management In The Hillsides Of Honduras: Bioeconomic Modeling At The Micro-Watershed Level," EPTD Discussion Papers 16058, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:16058
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.16058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/16058/files/ept-dp32.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.16058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hazell, P. B. R. & Scherr, Sara J., 1994. "Sustainable agricultural development strategies in fragile lands:," EPTD discussion papers 1, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Scherr, Sara J. & Hazell, Peter B.R., 1994. "Sustainable Agricultural Development Strategies In Fragile Lands," EPTD Discussion Papers 16060, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hazell, Peter B.R. & Chakravorty, Ujjayant & Dixon, John & Celis, Rafael, 2001. "Monitoring Systems For Managing Natural Resources: Economics, Indicators And Environmental Externalities In A Costa Rican Watershed," EPTD Discussion Papers 16119, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Bergeron, Gilles & Pender, John L., 1999. "Determinants of land use change: evidence from a community study in Honduras," EPTD Discussion Papers 97464, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chamberlin, Jordan & Pender, John L. & Yu, Bingxin, 2006. "Development domains for Ethiopia: capturing the geographical context of smallholder development options," DSGD Discussion Papers 55410, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Bergeron, Gilles & Pender, John L., 1999. "Determinants of land use change: evidence from a community study in Honduras," EPTD Discussion Papers 97464, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Cai, Ximing & Cline, Sarah A. & Nakagawa, Naoko, 2002. "The Role Of Rainfed Agriculture In The Future Of Global Food Production," EPTD Discussion Papers 16053, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Pender, John L. & Scherr, Sara J. & Duron, Guadalupe, 1999. "Pathways of development in the hillsides of Honduras," EPTD Discussion Papers 97465, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Fan, Shenggen & Hazell, Peter B.R., 1999. "Are Returns to Public Investment Lower in Less-favored Rural Areas?: An Empirical Analysis of India," EPTD Discussion Papers 42828, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Pender, John L. & Jagger, Pamela & Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2001. "Development Pathways And Land Management In Uganda: Causes And Implications," EPTD Discussion Papers 16124, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    7. Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Pender, John L. & Kaizzi, Crammer & Edward, Kato & Mugarura, Samuel, 2005. "Policy Options for Increasing Crop Productivity and Reducing Soil Nutrient Depletion and Poverty in Uganda," EPTD Discussion Papers 59227, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Pender, John L. & Scherr, Sara J., 1999. "Organizational Development And Natural Resource Management: Evidence From Central Honduras," EPTD Discussion Papers 97503, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    9. Pender, John L. & Jagger, Pamela & Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Sserunkuuma, Dick, 2001. "Development pathways and land management in Uganda: causes and implications," EPTD discussion papers 85, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Barbier, Bruno & Bergeron, Gilles, 2001. "Natural resource management in the hillsides of Honduras: bioeconomic modeling at the micro-watershed level," Research reports 123, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    11. Scherr, Sara J., 1995. "Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: Patterns observed in Western Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(5), pages 787-804, May.
    12. Pender, John L. & Scherr, Sara J., 1999. "Organizational development and natural resource management: evidence from central Honduras," EPTD discussion papers 49, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Tisdell, Clement A., 1998. "Asia's Livestock Industries: Changes and Environmental Consequences," Economics, Ecology and Environment Working Papers 54347, University of Queensland, School of Economics.
    14. Jonathan Newby & Rob Cramb & Somphanh Sakanphet, 2014. "Forest Transitions and Rural Livelihoods: Multiple Pathways of Smallholder Teak Expansion in Northern Laos," Land, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Durón, Guadalupe & Pender, John L. & Scherr, Sara J., 1999. "Pathways of development in the hillsides of Honduras: causes and implications for agricultural production, poverty, and sustainable resource use," EPTD discussion papers 45, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    16. Nkonya, Ephraim & von Braun, Joachim & Mirzabaev, Alisher & Le, Quang Bao & Kwon, Ho Young & Kirui, Oliver K., 2013. "Economics of Land Degradation Initiative: Methods and Approach for Global and National Assessments," Discussion Papers 158663, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    17. Templeton, Scott R. & Scherr, Sara J., 1999. "Effects of Demographic and Related Microeconomic Change on Land Quality in Hills and Mountains of Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(6), pages 903-918, June.
    18. Davis, Carlton G., 1994. "Integrating Economic Growth, Equity, and Environmental Assets Components of Sustainable Development in Tropical Agriculture: A Conceptual Framework," International Working Paper Series 237428, University of Florida, Food and Resource Economics Department.
    19. Bhalla, G.S. & Hazell, Peter B.R. & Kerr, John M., 1999. "Prospects for India’s Cereal Supply and Demand to 2020," Food, Agriculture and the Environment Discussion Papers 42274, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Shuhan Liu & Dongyan Wang & Hong Li & Wenbo Li & Qing Wang, 2017. "Ecological Land Fragmentation Evaluation and Dynamic Change of a Typical Black Soil Farming Area in Northeast China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:16058. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.