IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/43554.html

Life annuity program in Romania: is the indemnity high enough to be efficient?

Author

Listed:
  • Ghib, Marie-Luce

Abstract

Romania bears the marks of the country’s former land policies : 36% of the active population is involved in agricultural activity. In addition, the agricultural land is characterized by excessive land fragmentation (approximately 2 ha per holding). In the context of a strong will to stimulate the land market and to encourage competitiveness by modernizing the production systems, the Ministry of Agriculture in 2005 decided to implement a specific policy : the life annuity subsidy. This consists in a subsidy calculated according to the surface of the agricultural land, paid to people over 62 years old who commit themselves to stopping agricultural activity. This paper analyses the opportunity for farmers to participate in this program using a Net Present Value to test the financial incentive of the measure under renting or selling contracts. We based our analysis on data concerning the land market and profitability from a survey conducted in the Mures region in the summer of 2007 and on land price figures. We show that in this specific context of grain and land prices, the amount of the subsidy is not high enough to make the program attractive but comforts landowners who are already engaged in renting contracts.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghib, Marie-Luce, 2008. "Life annuity program in Romania: is the indemnity high enough to be efficient?," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43554, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43554
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.43554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/43554/files/082.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.43554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ciaian, Pavel & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2006. "AJAE Appendix: Land Market Imperfections and Agricultural Policy Impacts in the New EU Member States: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis," American Journal of Agricultural Economics APPENDICES, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 88(4), pages 1-10, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. World Bank, 2011. "Romania : Considering Options for Extending Social Protection Coverage to Elderly Farmers," World Bank Publications - Reports 12583, The World Bank Group.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    2. Jerzy Michalek & Pavel Ciaian & d’Artis Kancs, 2014. "Capitalization of the Single Payment Scheme into Land Value: Generalized Propensity Score Evidence from the European Union," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 90(2), pages 260-289.
    3. O'Donoghue, Cathal & Lopez, Jeremey & O’Neill, Stephen & Ryan, Mary, 2015. "AHedonic Price Model of Self-Assessed Agricultural Land Values," 150th Seminar, October 22-23, 2015, Edinburgh, Scotland 212639, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. A. Qineti & M. Rajcaniova & E. Matejkova, 2009. "The competitiveness and comparative advantage of the Slovak and the EU agri-food trade with Russia and Ukraine," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(8), pages 375-383.
    5. Wensheng Lin & Rongyuan Chen, 2021. "The Capitalization Effect and Its Consequence of Agricultural Support Policies—Based on the Evidence of 800 Villages in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-13, July.
    6. Viaggi, D. & Bartolini, Fabio & Puddu, M. & Raggi, M., 2013. "Impact of post-2013 CAP reform on land markets: evidence from farm surveys and farm-level modelling," 2013: Productivity and Its Impacts on Global Trade, June 2-4, 2013. Seville, Spain 152376, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Qineti, Artan & Smutka, Lubos, 2011. "The Agrarian Trade Transformation in the Visegrad Countries," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114781, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Johan Swinnen & Kym Anderson, 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Europe's Transition Economies," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6502, April.
    9. D'Artis Kancs & Pavel Ciaian, 2010. "Factor content of bilateral trade: the role of firm heterogeneity and transaction costs," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 41(3‐4), pages 305-317, May.
    10. Paul Feichtinger & Klaus Salhofer, 2016. "Decoupled Single Farm Payments of the CAP and Land Rental Prices," Working Papers 652016, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Department of Economics and Social Sciences, Institute for Sustainable Economic Development.
    11. Miroslav SVATOŠ & Luboš SMUTKA, 2012. "Development of agricultural trade and competitiveness of the commodity structures of individual countries of the Visegrad Group," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(5), pages 222-238.
    12. Puddu, Marco & Bartolini, Fabio & Viaggi, Davide, "undated". "Simulation of Land Use and Investment Behaviour under Different Policy Scenarios: Results of the extended farm/household model," Working papers 127979, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    13. Pavel Ciaian & D'Artis Kancs & Johan Swinnen, 2014. "The Impact of the 2013 Reform of the Common Agricultural Policy on Land Capitalization in the European Union," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(4), pages 643-673.
    14. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    15. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2011. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content in Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE - Vantaggi comparati, costi di transazione e contenuto dei fattori nel commercio agr," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 64(1), pages 67-101.
    16. Nicola Galluzzo, 2021. "Estimation of the impact of CAP subsidies as environmental variables on Romanian farms," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 23(3), pages 1-24.
    17. Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, "undated". "Direct payments and rent extraction by land owners: Evidence form New Member States," 122nd Seminar, February 17-18, 2011, Ancona, Italy 99583, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Van Herck, Kristine & Vranken, Liesbet, "undated". "Direct Payments and Land Rents: Evidence from New Member States," Working papers 157121, Factor Markets, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    19. Yeboah, Osei & Naanwaab, Cephas & Shaik, Saleem & Legesse, Befikadu & Odom, Phillipa, 2017. "Is Mandatory Country of Origin Labeling a Proxy for Import Quota: A Partial Equilibrium Analysis of U.S Beef Imports?," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252807, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.