IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa145/200345.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Geographical Indications in Progress…Do Latin America Countries Represent a Third Path of Development?

Author

Listed:
  • Sidali, Katia Laura
  • Granja, Nelson
  • Monteros, Alvaro
  • Wilson, Usiña

Abstract

Geographical Indications (GIs) are names of regions, specific places or, in exceptional cases, countries, used to describe an agricultural product or a foodstuff (EC 510/2006, Art. 2). They have received much attention in the last years not only at the European level, where they stem from, but also at different international forums such as at the World International Organization (WTO). Being a particular form of intellectual property these certifications schemes could have the potential to be applied also to non-agrifood commodities or even services. Furthermore, due to the severe menace of biodiversity loss caused by globalization, GIs could serve as a tool to promote biodiversity if linked to plant varieties menaced of disappearance or rare animal species. However, international negotiations to achieve these purposes are long and results are minimal (REF). For these reasons the purpose of this paper is to introduce a new stance to the topic of GIs borrowing from the Latin-american implementation of GIs which in some aspects can be considered quite innovative. In the remainder of this paper the authors will present a short description of GIs as they are discussed at different international forums. Further, the innovative implementation of GIs in Latin America will be illustrated by means of three examples: the Sombrero of Montecristi, the GIs of a Brasilian technology and science park (TSP) and the cacao Arriba. Eventually, some conclusions will be presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Sidali, Katia Laura & Granja, Nelson & Monteros, Alvaro & Wilson, Usiña, 2015. "Geographical Indications in Progress…Do Latin America Countries Represent a Third Path of Development?," 145th Seminar, April 14-15, 2015, Parma, Italy 200345, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa145:200345
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200345/files/Sidali%20et%20al%20_2015_%20Geographical%20Indications%20in%20Progress_Do%20Latin%20America%20Countries%20Represent%20a%20Third%20Path%20of%20Development.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.200345?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katia Laura Sidali & Achim Spiller, 2014. "Cultural property rights in the eu geographical indications? system: Cui prodest?," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 16(2), pages 97-104.
    2. Huang, Chia-Hui & Tsaur, Jen-Ruey & Yang, Chih-Hai, 2012. "Does world heritage list really induce more tourists? Evidence from Macau," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 1450-1457.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria Cecilia Mancini & Filippo Arfini & Mario Veneziani & Erik Thévenod‐Mottet, 2017. "Geographical Indications and Transatlantic Trade Negotiations: Different US and EU Perspectives," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 16(2), pages 34-40, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katia L. Sidali & Nelson R. Granja Toledo & Alvaro Monteros Altamirano & Mirian Sanchez Fernandez & Maria del Rosario Mej?a & Wilson Usina, 2016. "New trends in the debate on geographical indications: evidence from Ecuador," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 18(1), pages 39-52.
    2. Sofia Gouveia & João Rebelo & Lina Lourenço-Gomes & Alexandre Guedes, 2017. "International demand for the Douro (Portugal) river cruises," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(8), pages 1679-1686, December.
    3. Radenka Mitova & Bilyana Borisova & Boian Koulov, 2021. "Digital Marketing of Bulgarian Natural Heritage for Tourism and Recreation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Mohamed Abdalla Elsayed Hassan & Konstantina Zerva & Silvia Aulet, 2021. "Brand Personality Traits of World Heritage Sites: Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Gozgor, Giray & Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Zeng, Yan & Lin, Zhibin, 2019. "The effectiveness of the legal system and inbound tourism," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 24-35.
    6. Can, Ali Selcuk & Ekinci, Yuksel & Pino, Giovanni, 2021. "Joint brand advertising for emerging heritage sites," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    7. Zhou Bo & Li Ningqiao, 2018. "The impact of high-speed trains on regional tourism economies," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(2), pages 187-203, March.
    8. David Wuepper, 2017. "What is the value of world heritage status for a German national park? A choice experiment from Jasmund, 1 year after inscription," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(5), pages 1114-1123, August.
    9. Fung, Ivan W.H. & Tsang, Y.T. & Tam, Vivian W.Y. & Xu, Y.T. & Mok, Edmund C.K., 2017. "A review on historic building conservation: A comparison between Hong Kong and Macau systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 927-942.
    10. Jaume Rosselló Nadal & María Santana Gallego, 2022. "Gravity models for tourism demand modeling: Empirical review and outlook," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1358-1409, December.
    11. Morley, Clive & Rosselló, Jaume & Santana-Gallego, Maria, 2014. "Gravity models for tourism demand: theory and use," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-10.
    12. Jones, Thomas E. & Yang, Yang & Yamamoto, Kiyotatsu, 2017. "Assessing the recreational value of world heritage site inscription: A longitudinal travel cost analysis of Mount Fuji climbers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 67-78.
    13. Antonakakis, Nikos & Dragouni, Mina & Eeckels, Bruno & Filis, George, 2015. "Tourism and economic growth revisited: Empirical evidence from a Panel VAR approach," MPRA Paper 67419, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Yang, Yang & Xue, Lan & Jones, Thomas E., 2019. "Tourism-enhancing effect of World Heritage Sites: Panacea or placebo? A meta-analysis," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 29-41.
    15. Petr, Christine, 2015. "How heritage site tourists may become monument visitors," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 247-262.
    16. David Wuepper & Marc Patry, 2017. "The World Heritage list: Which sites promote the brand? A big data spatial econometrics approach," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 41(1), pages 1-21, February.
    17. Edgardo I. Garrido-P?rez & Katia Laura Sidali, 2014. "Salsa, sauce, and other ingredients: nature, evolution and conservation of cultural heritage," Economia agro-alimentare, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 16(3), pages 81-104.
    18. Christian M Rogerson & Clinton D van der Merwe, 2016. "Heritage tourism in the global South: Development impacts of the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site, South Africa," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 31(1-2), pages 234-248, February.
    19. Leask, Anna, 2016. "Visitor attraction management: A critical review of research 2009–2014," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 334-361.
    20. Vanessa Amaro, 2024. "Crowing in two voices: The cultural transformation of the Portuguese rooster in postcolonial Macau," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Community/Rural/Urban Development; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; International Relations/Trade;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa145:200345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.