IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa118/95313.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Environmental payments in conflicting situations between nature provision and cost minimization: a political economy approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nuppenau, Ernst-August

Abstract

We will analyze a newly emerging conflict within the second pillar of the rural development policy of the EU: a conflict between those farmers, who want to participate in high nature value agriculture, and farmers, who feel negatively impacted by supporting nature provision. We see a link through competition for land between nature provision in agriculture and cost minimal production of commercial farmers. The idea is to model this conflict using a political bargain approach and make a contribution on how to solve the conflict by innovative institutional arrangements. The power of groups will be analyzed and what governments can do.

Suggested Citation

  • Nuppenau, Ernst-August, 2010. "Environmental payments in conflicting situations between nature provision and cost minimization: a political economy approach," 118th Seminar, August 25-27, 2010, Ljubljana, Slovenia 95313, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:95313
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.95313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/95313/files/Lubljana-19-10-10-Nuppenau.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.95313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Hodge, 2007. "The Governance of Rural Land in a Liberalised World," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 409-432, September.
    2. Christine Schleupner & P. Michael Link, 2007. "Potential impacts on important bird habitats in Eiderstedt (Schleswig-Holstein) caused by agricultural land use changes," Working Papers FNU-138, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Jun 2007.
    3. Zusman, Pinhas, 1976. "The Incorporation and Measurement of Social Power in Economic Models," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 17(2), pages 447-462, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John C. Beghin & William E. Foster & Mylene Kherallah, 1996. "Institutions And Market Distortions: International Evidence For Tobacco," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 355-365, January.
    2. Finkelshtain, Israel & Kislev, Yoav, 1996. "Political Lobbying, Individual Rationality, and Asymmetry of Taxes and Subsidies," Working Papers 232801, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Center for Agricultural Economic Research.
    3. Zusman, Pinhas, 1990. "Political-Econometrics: The Quantitative Investigation of a Political-Economy," CUDARE Working Papers 198570, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    4. Klaus Mittenzwei & David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer, 2012. "Towards a theory of policy timing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 583-596, October.
    5. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 1989. "Path Dependent Policy Reforms: From Land Refrom to Rural Development in Colombia," CUDARE Working Papers 198493, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    6. Jongeneel, Roel & Polman, Nico, 2014. "Farmer groups as a device to ensure the provision of green services in the Netherlands: a political economy perspective," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186674, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Lyons, R. F. & Rausser, Gordon C. & Simon, L. K., 1992. "Disruption and Continuity in Bulgaria's Agrarian Reform," Staff General Research Papers Archive 728, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Lichtenberg, Erik, 1992. "Agricultural Versus Urban Interests in Groundwater Quality," Working Papers 197784, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    9. Richard Ball, 1995. "Interest Groups, Influence And Welfare," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 7(2), pages 119-146, July.
    10. Zusman, Pinhas & Rausser, Gordon, 1990. "Endogenous Policy Theory: The Political Structure and Policy Formation," CUDARE Working Papers 198567, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    11. Zusman, Pinhas, 1995. "Public Policy for Agriculture: The Role of Constitutions, Institutions and Political Economy," 1994 Conference, August 22-29, 1994, Harare, Zimbabwe 183388, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    12. Ernst-August Nuppenau, 2018. "Eco-System Services in Agrarian Value Chains: Value Detection of Bio-Diversity as Public Good Provision, Problems, and Institutional Issues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    13. Lyons, Robert F. & Rausser, Gordon C. & Simon, Leo K., 1996. "Putty-clay politics in transition economies," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0t30p88v, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    14. Marchant, Mary A. & Neff, Steven A. & Xiao, Mei, 1997. "Political Economy of United States and European Union Dairy Policy Choice," 1997 Occasional Paper Series No. 7 198045, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Christian, Douglas & Schmitz, Andrew, 1992. "The Adoption of Welfare-Reducing Policies: An Alternative Explanation from U.S. Agriculture," CUDARE Working Papers 198607, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    16. Nandor Csikos & Malte Schwanebeck & Michael Kuhwald & Peter Szilassi & Rainer Duttmann, 2019. "Density of Biogas Power Plants as An Indicator of Bioenergy Generated Transformation of Agricultural Landscapes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, April.
    17. Birner, Regina & Resnick, Danielle, 2010. "The Political Economy of Policies for Smallholder Agriculture," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 1442-1452, October.
    18. de Janvry, Alain & Fafchamps, Marcel & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 1994. "The Challenge of Ruling over Diversity: An Extension of Pinhas Zusman's Modeling of Social Power," CUDARE Working Papers 201467, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    19. Jongeneel, Roel & Pollman, Nico, 2014. "Farmer groups as a device to ensure the provision of green services in the Netherlands: a political economy perspective," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186379, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Coggins, Jay S., 1994. "Implementing Agricultural Policy Virtually: The Case of Set-Aside," Staff Papers 200579, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Community/Rural/Urban Development;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa118:95313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.