IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc10/91832.html

The Implications of Alternative U.S. Domestic and Trade Policies for Biofuels

Author

Listed:
  • Yano, Yuki
  • Blandford, David
  • Surry, Yves R.

Abstract

The U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard program (RFS), which involves mandates for various biofuels, is complex and has been often misinterpreted or oversimplified in previous studies. In this paper we analyze the implications of the RFS for the U.S. domestic and international ethanol markets. We demonstrate the vital role of the advanced biofuel mandate within the RFS. Impacts of changes in tariffs on imported fuel ethanol and subsidies for U.S. domestic ethanol production are examined. One of our important findings is that the RFS could result in serious misallocation of resources in both a national and international context. There is a possibility that the United States could be required to import sugarcane-based ethanol to meet the advanced biofuel mandate, simultaneously exporting corn-based ethanol, while satisfying the national overall mandate. Since the provision of subsidies for domestic ethanol production can stimulate exports of corn-based ethanol, they are equivalent to export subsidies in this situation. The removal of tariffs can reduce the burden imposed on consumers in the United States from the operation of the RFS. Our analysis shows that it is extremely important to understand the potential impact of the RFS on agricultural and energy markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Yano, Yuki & Blandford, David & Surry, Yves R., "undated". "The Implications of Alternative U.S. Domestic and Trade Policies for Biofuels," 84th Annual Conference, March 29-31, 2010, Edinburgh, Scotland 91832, Agricultural Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc10:91832
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.91832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/91832/files/104yana_blandford_surry.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.91832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Gorter, Harry & Just, David R., 2007. "The Law of Unintended Consequences: How the U.S. Biofuel Tax Credit with a Mandate Subsidizes Oil Consumption and Has No Impact on Ethanol Consumption," Working Papers 127022, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    2. de Gorter, Harry & Just, David R., 2007. "The Economics of U.S. Ethanol Import Tariffs with a Consumption Mandate and Tax Credit," Working Papers 127023, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Harry de Gorter & David R. Just, 2008. "The Economics of a Blend Mandate for Biofuels," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 91(3), pages 738-750.
    4. Martinez-Gonzalez, Ariadna & Sheldon, Ian M. & Thompson, Stanley R., 2007. "Estimating the Effects of U.S. Distortions in the Ethanol Market Using a Partial Equilibrium Trade Model," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon 9802, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Martinez-Gonzalez Ariadna & Sheldon Ian M & Thompson Stanley, 2007. "Estimating the Welfare Effects of U.S. Distortions in the Ethanol Market Using a Partial Equilibrium Trade Model," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sunil P. Dhoubhadel & Azzeddine M. Azzam & Matthew C. Stockton, 2017. "Does the USA have market power in importing ethanol from Brazil?," International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2/3), pages 251-266.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Unknown, 2013. "Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Volume 09, Number 1, 2013," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 9(01), pages 140-140.
    2. Blandford, David & Orden, David, 2008. "United States: Shadow WTO Agricultural Domestic Support Notifications," IFPRI discussion papers 821, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    3. Dong Hee Suh & Charles B. Moss, 2017. "Dynamic adjustment of ethanol demand to crude oil prices: implications for mandated ethanol usage," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1587-1607, June.
    4. de Gorter Harry & Just David R, 2008. "The Economics of the U.S. Ethanol Import Tariff with a Blend Mandate and Tax Credit," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, December.
    5. repec:aen:journl:ej34-4-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Espinola-Arredondo, Ana & Wandschneider, Philip R. & Yoder, Jonathan K., 2009. "Biofuel policy for the pursuit of multiple goals: The case of Washington State," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 8(01), pages 1-9.
    7. Snorre Kverndokk & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2013. "Effects of Transport Regulation on the Oil Market: Does Market Power Matter?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 115(3), pages 662-694, July.
    8. Zhang, Dengjun & Asche, Frank & Oglend, Atle, 2014. "Ethanol and trade: An analysis of price transmission in the US market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 1-8.
    9. Lapan, Harvey E. & Moschini, GianCarlo, 2009. "Biofuels policies and welfare: is the stick of mandates better than the carrot of subsidies?," ISU General Staff Papers 200906100700001138, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    10. van Tol, M.C.M. & Moncada, J.A. & Lukszo, Z. & Weijnen, M., 2021. "Modelling the interaction between policies and international trade flows for liquid biofuels: an agent-based modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Lade, Gabriel & Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia & Smith, Aaron, 2014. "Policy Uncertainty under Market-Based Regulations: Evidence from the Renewable Fuel Standard," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170673, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Drabik, Dusan & de Gorter, Harry & Just, David R., 2010. "The Implications of Alternative Biofuel Policies on Carbon Leakage," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 102689, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Hochman Gal & Sexton Steven E & Zilberman David D, 2008. "The Economics of Biofuel Policy and Biotechnology," Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, De Gruyter, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, December.
    14. Jussila Hammes, Johanna, 2011. "Path dependence: Biofuels policy under uncertainty about greenhouse gas emissions," Working Papers 2011:1, Swedish National Road & Transport Research Institute (VTI).
    15. Miranowski, John A. & Rosburg, Alicia, 2010. "Using Cellulosic Ethanol to ‘Go Green’: What Price for Carbon?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 61395, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Drabik, Dusan, 2011. "The Theory of Biofuel Policy and Food Grain Prices," Working Papers 126615, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. Swinbank, Alan & Tranter, Richard & Jones, Philip, 2011. "Mandates, buyouts and fuel-tax rebates: Some economic aspects of biofuel policies using the UK as an example," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1249-1253, March.
    18. Thompson, Wyatt & Meyer, Seth D. & Westhoff, Patrick C., 2010. "Us Biofuel And Climate Policies Duel Over Cellulosic Biomass," 2010: Climate Change in World Agriculture: Mitigation, Adaptation, Trade and Food Security, June 2010, Stuttgart-Hohenheim, Germany 91404, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    19. DeGorter, Harry & Just, David & Mugera, Harriet Kasidi, 2013. "Structural Changes in Commodity Prices: The Role of Policies," 53rd Annual Conference, Berlin, Germany, September 25-27, 2013 156255, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    20. Vincent Martinet, 2012. "Effect of soil heterogeneity on the welfare economics of biofuel policies," Working Papers 2012/01, INRA, Economie Publique.
    21. Geraldo Sant'ana de Camargo Barros & Lucilio Rogerio Aparecido Alves & Mauro Osaki, 2010. "Biofuels, food security and compensatory subsidies," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 2(4), pages 433-455, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc10:91832. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.