IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/mgt/micp13/597-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Rethinking Modern European Industrial Policy: Beyond the Current EU Legal Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Matjaz Nahtigal

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to show that the current European Union (EU) legal framework is unnecessarily restrictive and unduly suppresses economic and developmental initiatives in many stagnating regions across Europe. More innovative industrial policies, instruments and measures should be adopted in a highly decentralized manner across the EU. Between the ‘laissez-faire’ and ‘dirigiste’ approaches, there is significant room to maneuver for more pro-active industrial and development policies. New forms of industrial policies could and should be reinvented and implemented across the EU – not to harm or distort competition, but rather to further enhance it. More than one form and framework exist for a Single Market and for the competition policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Matjaz Nahtigal, 2013. "Rethinking Modern European Industrial Policy: Beyond the Current EU Legal Framework," MIC 2013: Industry, Science and Policy Makers for Sustainable Future; Proceedings of the 14th International Conference, Koper, 21–23 November 2013 [Selected Papers],, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:micp13:597-611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-266-148-9/papers/MIC1120.pdf
    File Function: full text in English
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Mangabeira Unger, 2007. "Free Trade Reimagined: The World Division of Labor and the Method of Economics," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 8473.
    2. Patrizio Bianchi & Sandrine Labory (ed.), 2006. "International Handbook on Industrial Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3451.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matjaz Nahtigal, 2014. "Toward Modern European Industrial Policy," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 12(2 (Summer), pages 179-194.
    2. Zheng, Guo & Barbieri, Elisa & Di Tommaso, Marco R. & Zhang, Lei, 2016. "Development zones and local economic growth: zooming in on the Chinese case," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 238-249.
    3. repec:zbw:iamodp:163932 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Joao Gaspar & Gilson Pina & Marta Simoes, 2014. "Agriculture in Portugal: linkages with industry and services," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 95(4), pages 437-471.
    5. López-Estornell, Manuel & Tortajada Esparza, Enrique & Martinez-Chafer, l, 2012. "The evolution toward vagueness of industrial district concept and its impact on regional innovation policy," INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series 201211, INGENIO (CSIC-UPV).
    6. Ng, Wei Keat Benny & Appel-Meulenbroek, Rianne & Cloodt, Myriam & Arentze, Theo, 2019. "Towards a segmentation of science parks: A typology study on science parks in Europe," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 719-732.
    7. Olga Romanova & Yevgeniy Starikov, 2015. "Changes in the Vector of Industrial Policy and Possibilities for Innovative Development of the Industrial Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 322-333.
    8. Rehfeld, Dieter & Terstriep, Judith, 2019. "Rückwärts in die Zukunft? Ein Essay zur jüngsten Debatte um Industriepolitik," Forschung Aktuell 04/2019, Institut Arbeit und Technik (IAT), Westfälische Hochschule, University of Applied Sciences.
    9. Alessandra Chirco & Marcella Scrimitore, 2010. "Price Competition in International Mixed Oligopolies," Working Paper series 48_10, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    10. A. Arrighetti & A. Ninni, 2009. "Firm size and growth opportunities: a survey," Economics Department Working Papers 2009-EP05, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    11. Martin Stephen & Valbonesi Paola, 2008. "Equilibrium State Aid in Integrating Markets," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-39, August.
    12. Petrick, Martin & Oshakbaev, Dauren & Wandel, Jürgen, 2014. "Kazakhstan's wheat, beef and dairy sectors: An assessment of their development constraints and recent policy responses," IAMO Discussion Papers 163932, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    13. Pitelis, Christos & Kelmendi, Pellumb, 2009. "The political economy of European anti-trust and industrial policy," MPRA Paper 23941, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Sofija Adžic, 2014. "Kako investirati u uslovima globalizacije studija slucaja za Srbiju," Ekonomija Economics, Rifin d.o.o., vol. 21(1), pages 209-249.
    15. Werner Hölzl, 2010. "The Economics of Entrepreneurship Policy: Introduction to the Special Issue," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 187-197, September.
    16. Giacomo Calzolari & Carlo Scarpa, 2009. "Footloose Monopolies: Regulating a “National Champion”," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 1179-1214, December.
    17. Marco R. Di Tommaso & Stuart O. Schweitzer, 2013. "Industrial Policy in America," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 13749.
    18. Christos N. Pitelis & Pellumb Kelmendi, 2011. "European Industrial Policy: Perspectives, Trends and a Sustainability-focused New Framework," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume II, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Andrea Bianchi & Raffaele Brancati & Luigi Paganetto & Carlo Pietrobelli & Anna Giunta & Paolo Leon, 2007. "Policies in support of innovation and competitiveness of Italian firms," QA - Rivista dell'Associazione Rossi-Doria, Associazione Rossi Doria, issue 2, May.
    20. Martin Petrick & Dauren Oshakbayev & Regina Taitukova & Nodir Djanibekov, 2017. "The return of the regulator: Kazakhstan’s cotton sector reforms since independence," Central Asian Survey, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 430-452, October.
    21. Arjun Jayadev, 2011. "Global Governance and Human Development: Promoting Democratic Accountability and Institutional Experimentation," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 469-491, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:micp13:597-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.