IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/ptu50.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Matteo Turri

Personal Details

First Name:Matteo
Middle Name:
Last Name:Turri
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:ptu50
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.economia.unimi.it/index.php?id=310&L=0

Affiliation

Dipartimento di Economia, Management e Metodi Quantitativi (DEMM)
Università degli Studi di Milano

Milano, Italy
http://www.demm.unimi.it/

: +39 02 503 16486
+39 02 503 16475
Via Conservatorio 7 - 20122 Milano
RePEc:edi:damilit (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Matteo Turri, 2012. "Linee di evoluzione della valutazione nei sistemi universitari europei," LIUC Papers in Economics 259, Cattaneo University (LIUC).

Articles

  1. Rebora, Gianfranco & Turri, Matteo, 2013. "The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1657-1666.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Matteo Turri, 2012. "Linee di evoluzione della valutazione nei sistemi universitari europei," LIUC Papers in Economics 259, Cattaneo University (LIUC).

    Cited by:

    1. Giulio Greco, 2014. "Una comparazione internazionale tra i sistemi di valutazione della ricerca scientifica," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(1), pages 87-99.

Articles

  1. Rebora, Gianfranco & Turri, Matteo, 2013. "The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1657-1666.

    Cited by:

    1. Berlemann, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2015. "Which factors drive the decision to opt out of individual research rankings? An empirical study of academic resistance to change," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1108-1115.
    2. Bertocchi, Graziella & Gambardella, Alfonso & Jappelli, Tullio & Nappi, Carmela A. & Peracchi, Franco, 2015. "Bibliometric evaluation vs. informed peer review: Evidence from Italy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 451-466.
    3. Salter, Ammon & Salandra, Rossella & Walker, James, 2017. "Exploring preferences for impact versus publications among UK business and management academics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(10), pages 1769-1782.
    4. Bagues, Manuel & Sylos-Labini, Mauro & Zinovyeva, Natalia, 2017. "A Walk on the Wild Side: `Predatory' Journals and Information Asymmetries in Scientific Evaluations," CEPR Discussion Papers 12309, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. John Mingers & Jesse R. O’Hanley & Musbaudeen Okunola, 2017. "Using Google Scholar institutional level data to evaluate the quality of university research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(3), pages 1627-1643, December.
    6. Jappelli, Tullio & Nappi, Carmela Anna & Torrini, Roberto, 2017. "Gender effects in research evaluation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 911-924.
    7. Mattia Cattaneo & Michele Meoli & Andrea Signori, 2016. "Performance-based funding and university research productivity: the moderating effect of university legitimacy," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 85-104, February.
    8. Mingers, John & Yang, Liying, 2017. "Evaluating journal quality: A review of journal citation indicators and ranking in business and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 323-337.
    9. Stefano BIANCHINI & Francesco LISSONI & Michele PEZZONI & Lorenzo ZIRULIA, 2014. "The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: Theory and evidence from a technical university," Cahiers du GREThA 2014-15, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée.
    10. Cinzia Daraio, 2017. "A framework for the Assessment of Research and its impacts," DIAG Technical Reports 2017-04, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    11. Silvia Salini & Matteo Turri, 2016. "How to measure institutional diversity in higher education using revenue data," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 1165-1183, May.
    12. Biancardi, Daniele & Bratti, Massimiliano, 2018. "The Effect of the First Italian Research Evaluation Exercise on Student Enrolment Choices," IZA Discussion Papers 11302, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
    13. Calogero Guccio & Marco Ferdinando Martorana & Isidoro Mazza, 2016. "Efficiency assessment and convergence in teaching and research in Italian public universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 107(3), pages 1063-1094, June.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. No paper was announced in a field specific NEP report

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Matteo Turri should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.